Feature Requests: Browse | Submit New | Admin
Dear community members, I have encountered a strange situation; perhaps it is only strange for beginners like me, nevertheless, here is the problem in a nutshell: I have a yaxis that is logarithmic with range spanning more than 10 orders of magnitude (--yrange -13:1) And what happens is that the minor tick marks disappear. When I decrease the yrange to less than 10 orders of magnitude the minor tick reappear. Would someone know how to change this default? I would be very grateful if someone could get back to me at the earliest possible; I am am submit a paper next week and the plot that I am working on would be a part of this paper! Many thanks in advance! Best regards, Anand Thirumalai
Add A Comment:
Date: 2011-01-30 00:36 Sender: Anand Thirumalai Thank you very much Vincent! The patch works like a charm! I doubt if I would have been able to achieve the same result even using tioga by itself! The plot looks very nice now; I shall send you a DOI once the paper is published! Best wishes, Anand
Date: 2011-01-29 14:00 Sender: Vincent Fourmond Final comment: I have commited a modified version of the patch to SVN. While the patch posted here works as is for you, the version in SVN requires that you use the following snippet in your $HOME/.ctiogarc def ctioga_init(t) t.log_minor_ticks_limit = 20 end Cheers, and have fun !
Date: 2011-01-29 13:46 Sender: Vincent Fourmond There you are: I don't know how you installed Tioga in the first place; if that's using the Debian package or rubygems, that will require some few tricks. If not, please use the attached patch on the directory where Tioga is unpacked: patch -p1 < log-ticks.diff Then compile and install Tioga as usual. This patch will be included (almost as is) in the next Tioga release. As a side note, I'd suggest you switch to ctioga2 as soon as I release a new version: it now has much more features than ctioga and is much more fun to develop/easier to extend.
Date: 2011-01-29 13:25 Sender: Vincent Fourmond Hmmm... That's a complex problem... I have tried a few things, but I think the only way to do that for now with ctioga is to modify Tioga. I'll do that over the next hour, and I'll post a patch here. Are you familiar with patches ? In any case, good luck with your paper, and I'd be grateful if you sent me its DOI when you're done, I'd like to setup a list of papers using ctioga.