Feature Requests: Browse | Submit New | Admin

[#5815] active_record_subclass.should_have(3).records

Date:
2006-09-20 02:08		 Priority:
3
Submitted By:
David Chelimsky (dchelimsky) 		Assigned To:
Dave Astels (dastels)
Category:
None		 State:
Closed
Summary:
active_record_subclass.should_have(3).records

Detailed description 
active_record_subclass.should_have(3).find(:all) already works, but it sucks for readability.

active_record_subclass.should_have(3).records

Now THAT is nice

Add A Comment: Notepad

Please login


Followup

Message 
Date: 2006-09-20 05:16
Sender: David Chelimsky

Dave Astels committed this

Attached Files:

Name Description Download
No Files Currently Attached

Changes:

Field Old Value Date By
close_date2006-09-20 05:162006-09-20 05:16dchelimsky
status_idOpen2006-09-20 05:16dchelimsky