[Yarv-devel] evalc.patch

[SASADA Koichi]

Hi,

I'm Sorry, but I have not maintained evalc.patch.  Please use non-patch 
version (Ruby full set).

I'll remove eval.c patch next release (0.3.2).


Kashia Buch wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this happened after applying the evalc.patch to current ruby CVS HEAD  
> "2005-10-09":
> 
> jo:~/build/ruby john$ patch -p0 < evalc.patch
> patching file eval.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 905 with fuzz 2 (offset -61 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 921 (offset -61 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 956 (offset -60 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 4557 with fuzz 2 (offset -167 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 4946 with fuzz 2 (offset -174 lines).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 4961 (offset -180 lines).
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 5175 (offset -191 lines).
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 5651 with fuzz 1 (offset -238 lines).
> Hunk #10 succeeded at 5743 (offset -236 lines).
> Hunk #11 succeeded at 6007 with fuzz 2 (offset -224 lines).
> Hunk #12 succeeded at 6026 (offset -224 lines).
> Hunk #13 succeeded at 6036 (offset -225 lines).
> Hunk #14 succeeded at 6600 (offset -254 lines).
> Hunk #15 succeeded at 7713 (offset -324 lines).
> 
> jo:~/build/ruby john$ make
> 
> ...
> 
> gcc -g -O2  -fno-common -pipe -fno-common   -I. -I.  -c eval.c
> eval.c: In function `rb_call0':
> eval.c:5659: error: `nosuper' undeclared (first use in this function)
> eval.c:5659: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> eval.c:5659: error: for each function it appears in.)
> eval.c:5659: warning: passing arg 6 of pointer to function discards  
> qualifiers from pointer target type
> make: *** [eval.o] Error 1
> 
> the lines in which the error occures:
> 
> if(IS_YARV_WORKING()){
>     if(nd_type(body) == NODE_SCOPE){
>       rb_warning("Ruby method is invoked under YARV environment");
>     }
>     else{
>       return YARV_CALL0(klass, recv, id, oid, argc, argv, body, nosuper);
>     }
>   }
> 
> nosuper isn't defined in that function, I just added a "int nosuper = 
> 0"  before that call, it compiled flawlessly, but I somehow doubt that 
> this is  really correct.
> 
> 
> Kash


-- 
SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net