sean.m.long at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 17:16:09 EST 2008
I think we should just write off 1.9.3 and go with 1.9.4.
On Jan 15, 2008 2:02 PM, Alex Fenton <alex at pressure.to> wrote:
> Sean Long wrote:
> > Now what should we do about the 1.9.3 Mac OS X gem which currently
> > only works on 10.5? Do I upload the fixed gem that contains code after
> > 1.9.3 was tagged?
> Thanks for tracking it down.
> I don't mind, really. We could cheat and re-upload the gem but I'm aware
> that's caused a few problems in the past. Doing the gem build on Linux
> turned up one more small exception so we could tag 1.9.4 and release
> that. I can put a patch for that in tomorrow and tag, in which case I'll
> delay announcing on c.l.r.
> Let me know what you prefer
> wxruby-development mailing list
> wxruby-development at rubyforge.org
More information about the wxruby-development