From dave at burt.id.au Mon May 1 04:10:11 2006 From: dave at burt.id.au (Dave Burt) Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 18:10:11 +1000 Subject: [Wtr-general] [OT] - Gem upgrade? In-Reply-To: <44544D98.9070909@qantom.com> References: <44544D98.9070909@qantom.com> Message-ID: <4455C263.2050500@burt.id.au> Raghu Venkataramana wrote: > How does one upgrade gems? when I do a gem install on the latest gem, I > find two versions of the same application installed: > > for example, > wet-web (0.5, 0.9) > > I am only left with an option to first uninstall the previous version of > GEM and then installing the new one. Is there a way to specify (while > installing the gem) that only the latest version needs to be kept and > the previous version can be removed? > > Any help is appreciated Use this command to remove all old versions of gems you have installed: gem cleanup However, as Bret said, there's no harm in leaving them there. One of RubyGems's features in fact is the ability to require a certain version of a gem library: require_gem "watir", "1.4" require_gem "watir", ">=1.4" Cheers, Dave From Sean.Gallagher at ticketmaster.com Mon May 1 09:30:48 2006 From: Sean.Gallagher at ticketmaster.com (Sean Gallagher) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 06:30:48 -0700 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer Message-ID: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640CDE86F0@pasmail3.office.tmcs> +1 > -----Original Message----- > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Bret > Pettichord > Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 1:44 PM > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer > > This is a proposal for packaging Watir 1.5. > > Watir will be distributed as two files. > 1. watir-1.5.0.gem - A gem that can be downloaded and > installed locally or remotely installed over the internet (as always). > 2. watir-bonus.zip - A zip file containing the user guide, > the examples, and notes on where to find the unit tests and > API docs (which are already in the gem). > > The gem would be required on any machine running Watir tests. > The bonus zip would be recommend for any users learning Watir. > > Specifically, i am proposing that we stop distributing the > one-click installer. Why? > - The one-click installer installs the watir library and > other files in different locations than the gem. This can > lead to confusion. > - The gem is becoming the standard method of installing Ruby > libraries. > - The one-click installer could be updated to make it more > consistent with the gem, but no one has signed up to do this. > - It is simpler to just have one method of installing Watir. > > I've discussed this off line with several people, but feel > like this is something that requires official community review. > > Please vote on this proposal. > > Bret > > From raghu at qantom.com Mon May 1 10:31:29 2006 From: raghu at qantom.com (Raghu Venkataramana) Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 20:01:29 +0530 Subject: [Wtr-general] [OT] - Gem upgrade? In-Reply-To: <4455C263.2050500@burt.id.au> References: <44544D98.9070909@qantom.com> <4455C263.2050500@burt.id.au> Message-ID: <44561BC1.4090204@qantom.com> Dave Burt wrote: >Raghu Venkataramana wrote: > > >>How does one upgrade gems? when I do a gem install on the latest gem, I >>find two versions of the same application installed: >> >>for example, >>wet-web (0.5, 0.9) >> >>I am only left with an option to first uninstall the previous version of >>GEM and then installing the new one. Is there a way to specify (while >>installing the gem) that only the latest version needs to be kept and >>the previous version can be removed? >> >>Any help is appreciated >> >> > >Use this command to remove all old versions of gems you have installed: > >gem cleanup > >However, as Bret said, there's no harm in leaving them there. > Nope. With two versions(and as time goes by it could be more than two) of a gem library, the script sometimes pickups the API from the wrong gem and fails. >One of >RubyGems's features in fact is the ability to require a certain version >of a gem library: > >require_gem "watir", "1.4" > >require_gem "watir", ">=1.4" > > The trouble is that every script will have to be changed whenever the version is changed. As of now, I am first doing a gem uninstall -a and then do a gem install Raghu >Cheers, >Dave >_______________________________________________ >Wtr-general mailing list >Wtr-general at rubyforge.org >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > -- Qantom Software Pvt. Ltd http://www.qantom.com Ph : 91-80-26655216 Xtn. 125 -- From dave at burt.id.au Mon May 1 10:45:31 2006 From: dave at burt.id.au (Dave Burt) Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 00:45:31 +1000 Subject: [Wtr-general] [OT] - Gem upgrade? In-Reply-To: <44561BC1.4090204@qantom.com> References: <44544D98.9070909@qantom.com> <4455C263.2050500@burt.id.au> <44561BC1.4090204@qantom.com> Message-ID: <44561F0B.5090500@burt.id.au> Raghu Venkataramana wrote: > Dave Burt wrote: >> Use this command to remove all old versions of gems you have installed: >> >> gem cleanup >> >> However, as Bret said, there's no harm in leaving them there. >> > Nope. With two versions(and as time goes by it could be more than two) > of a gem library, the > script sometimes pickups the API from the wrong gem and fails. A normal require should get the most recent version. Often people use require_gem to demand a version of a library that works with that program. require_gem "something", "<=0.6" > The trouble is that every script will have to be changed whenever the > version is changed. The point is that you _don't_ need to change your script, the script just uses the old version of the library. > As of now, I am first doing a gem uninstall -a and then do a > gem install Why not just use "gem cleanup"? Cheers, Dave From dave at burt.id.au Mon May 1 11:03:34 2006 From: dave at burt.id.au (Dave Burt) Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 01:03:34 +1000 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44562346.2090504@burt.id.au> +1 Bret Pettichord wrote: > This is a proposal for packaging Watir 1.5. > > Watir will be distributed as two files. > 1. watir-1.5.0.gem - A gem that can be downloaded and installed locally > or remotely installed over the internet (as always). > 2. watir-bonus.zip - A zip file containing the user guide, the examples, > and notes on where to find the unit tests and API docs (which are > already in the gem). > ... > Please vote on this proposal. The installer is redundant and problematic (viz. conflicts with gem versions). Better one distribution than two. This two-part solution's a good idea. I won't need -bonus; I can use gems' doc server. Cheers, Dave From harrychou at gmail.com Mon May 1 11:19:27 2006 From: harrychou at gmail.com (Harry Chou) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: <002601c66bcd$ded4bef0$6500a8c0@tintin> References: <002601c66bcd$ded4bef0$6500a8c0@tintin> Message-ID: <398ff7dc0605010819l6a9ebc8fj32be2ad6b9226b3@mail.gmail.com> I am newbie here. I am still learning Ruby and Watir is the whole reason I want to learn Ruby. I am afraid other new guys like me need to learn how to use GEM, before I can use Watir, before I start delve into Ruby. I am behind coporate firewall, I am constantly having touble using GEM installation. I know you will probably say GEM is easy. But, it's not easy for me. If it takes me more than couple hrs to know how to do it behind firewall, I am afraid other developers in my team will not bother to try it. Maybe I am missing something here. But, wouldn't we want to lower the barrier for people to use WATIR and even Ruby? On 4/29/06, Jonathan Kohl wrote: > > +1 > > > ________________________________ > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > Bret Pettichord > Sent: April 29, 2006 2:44 PM > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer > > > This is a proposal for packaging Watir 1.5. > > Watir will be distributed as two files. > 1. watir-1.5.0.gem - A gem that can be downloaded and installed locally or > remotely installed over the internet (as always). > 2. watir-bonus.zip - A zip file containing the user guide, the examples, and > notes on where to find the unit tests and API docs (which are already in the > gem). > > The gem would be required on any machine running Watir tests. The bonus zip > would be recommend for any users learning Watir. > > Specifically, i am proposing that we stop distributing the one-click > installer. Why? > - The one-click installer installs the watir library and other files in > different locations than the gem. This can lead to confusion. > - The gem is becoming the standard method of installing Ruby libraries. > - The one-click installer could be updated to make it more consistent with > the gem, but no one has signed up to do this. > - It is simpler to just have one method of installing Watir. > > I've discussed this off line with several people, but feel like this is > something that requires official community review. > > Please vote on this proposal. > > Bret > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > From PGarigue at EXTEND.COM Mon May 1 11:23:07 2006 From: PGarigue at EXTEND.COM (Pierre Garigue) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer Message-ID: what kind of problems are you having using Gem? -pierre -----Original Message----- From: Harry Chou [mailto:harrychou at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:19 AM To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer I am newbie here. I am still learning Ruby and Watir is the whole reason I want to learn Ruby. I am afraid other new guys like me need to learn how to use GEM, before I can use Watir, before I start delve into Ruby. I am behind coporate firewall, I am constantly having touble using GEM installation. I know you will probably say GEM is easy. But, it's not easy for me. If it takes me more than couple hrs to know how to do it behind firewall, I am afraid other developers in my team will not bother to try it. Maybe I am missing something here. But, wouldn't we want to lower the barrier for people to use WATIR and even Ruby? On 4/29/06, Jonathan Kohl wrote: > > +1 > > > ________________________________ > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > Bret Pettichord > Sent: April 29, 2006 2:44 PM > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer > > > This is a proposal for packaging Watir 1.5. > > Watir will be distributed as two files. > 1. watir-1.5.0.gem - A gem that can be downloaded and installed locally or > remotely installed over the internet (as always). > 2. watir-bonus.zip - A zip file containing the user guide, the examples, and > notes on where to find the unit tests and API docs (which are already in the > gem). > > The gem would be required on any machine running Watir tests. The bonus zip > would be recommend for any users learning Watir. > > Specifically, i am proposing that we stop distributing the one-click > installer. Why? > - The one-click installer installs the watir library and other files in > different locations than the gem. This can lead to confusion. > - The gem is becoming the standard method of installing Ruby libraries. > - The one-click installer could be updated to make it more consistent with > the gem, but no one has signed up to do this. > - It is simpler to just have one method of installing Watir. > > I've discussed this off line with several people, but feel like this is > something that requires official community review. > > Please vote on this proposal. > > Bret > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > _______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general From harrychou at gmail.com Mon May 1 11:30:20 2006 From: harrychou at gmail.com (Harry Chou) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <398ff7dc0605010830v362da560m98b788a39d685167@mail.gmail.com> I don't think GEM works easily behind Firewall/Proxy. Am I not right? On 5/1/06, Pierre Garigue wrote: > what kind of problems are you having using Gem? > > -pierre > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harry Chou [mailto:harrychou at gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:19 AM > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer > > > I am newbie here. I am still learning Ruby and Watir is the whole > reason I want to learn Ruby. I am afraid other new guys like me need > to learn how to use GEM, before I can use Watir, before I start delve > into Ruby. I am behind coporate firewall, I am constantly having > touble using GEM installation. > > I know you will probably say GEM is easy. But, it's not easy for me. > If it takes me more than couple hrs to know how to do it behind > firewall, I am afraid other developers in my team will not bother to > try it. > > Maybe I am missing something here. But, wouldn't we want to lower the > barrier for people to use WATIR and even Ruby? > > On 4/29/06, Jonathan Kohl wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > > Bret Pettichord > > Sent: April 29, 2006 2:44 PM > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer > > > > > > This is a proposal for packaging Watir 1.5. > > > > Watir will be distributed as two files. > > 1. watir-1.5.0.gem - A gem that can be downloaded and installed locally or > > remotely installed over the internet (as always). > > 2. watir-bonus.zip - A zip file containing the user guide, the examples, and > > notes on where to find the unit tests and API docs (which are already in the > > gem). > > > > The gem would be required on any machine running Watir tests. The bonus zip > > would be recommend for any users learning Watir. > > > > Specifically, i am proposing that we stop distributing the one-click > > installer. Why? > > - The one-click installer installs the watir library and other files in > > different locations than the gem. This can lead to confusion. > > - The gem is becoming the standard method of installing Ruby libraries. > > - The one-click installer could be updated to make it more consistent with > > the gem, but no one has signed up to do this. > > - It is simpler to just have one method of installing Watir. > > > > I've discussed this off line with several people, but feel like this is > > something that requires official community review. > > > > Please vote on this proposal. > > > > Bret > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > From charley.baker at gmail.com Mon May 1 11:30:54 2006 From: charley.baker at gmail.com (Charley Baker) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 09:30:54 -0600 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: <398ff7dc0605010819l6a9ebc8fj32be2ad6b9226b3@mail.gmail.com> References: <002601c66bcd$ded4bef0$6500a8c0@tintin> <398ff7dc0605010819l6a9ebc8fj32be2ad6b9226b3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I had problems using gem remote installs through a corporate proxy server as well. You can however, just download the watir.gem and from the command line do: > gem install watir.gem in the directory you downloaded the gem into. That should be pretty simple and will be the same process when you want to download other gems at some point. Otherwise you might try through an authenticating proxy: gem install watir -p http://user at pass:proxy-url Or: gem install watir -p http://proxy-url For a non-authenticating proxy. -Charley On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > > I am newbie here. I am still learning Ruby and Watir is the whole > reason I want to learn Ruby. I am afraid other new guys like me need > to learn how to use GEM, before I can use Watir, before I start delve > into Ruby. I am behind coporate firewall, I am constantly having > touble using GEM installation. > > I know you will probably say GEM is easy. But, it's not easy for me. > If it takes me more than couple hrs to know how to do it behind > firewall, I am afraid other developers in my team will not bother to > try it. > > Maybe I am missing something here. But, wouldn't we want to lower the > barrier for people to use WATIR and even Ruby? > > On 4/29/06, Jonathan Kohl wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > > Bret Pettichord > > Sent: April 29, 2006 2:44 PM > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer > > > > > > This is a proposal for packaging Watir 1.5. > > > > Watir will be distributed as two files. > > 1. watir-1.5.0.gem - A gem that can be downloaded and installed locally > or > > remotely installed over the internet (as always). > > 2. watir-bonus.zip - A zip file containing the user guide, the examples, > and > > notes on where to find the unit tests and API docs (which are already in > the > > gem). > > > > The gem would be required on any machine running Watir tests. The bonus > zip > > would be recommend for any users learning Watir. > > > > Specifically, i am proposing that we stop distributing the one-click > > installer. Why? > > - The one-click installer installs the watir library and other files in > > different locations than the gem. This can lead to confusion. > > - The gem is becoming the standard method of installing Ruby libraries. > > - The one-click installer could be updated to make it more consistent > with > > the gem, but no one has signed up to do this. > > - It is simpler to just have one method of installing Watir. > > > > I've discussed this off line with several people, but feel like this is > > something that requires official community review. > > > > Please vote on this proposal. > > > > Bret > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060501/02d5871f/attachment.html From harrychou at gmail.com Mon May 1 11:31:34 2006 From: harrychou at gmail.com (Harry Chou) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: <398ff7dc0605010830v362da560m98b788a39d685167@mail.gmail.com> References: <398ff7dc0605010830v362da560m98b788a39d685167@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <398ff7dc0605010831of96038ar2186fddf4e8aab62@mail.gmail.com> I know there perhaps are ways to get it working. I am just arguing that this will prevent people from JUST trying Watir. On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > I don't think GEM works easily behind Firewall/Proxy. Am I not right? > > On 5/1/06, Pierre Garigue wrote: > > what kind of problems are you having using Gem? > > > > -pierre > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Harry Chou [mailto:harrychou at gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:19 AM > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer > > > > > > I am newbie here. I am still learning Ruby and Watir is the whole > > reason I want to learn Ruby. I am afraid other new guys like me need > > to learn how to use GEM, before I can use Watir, before I start delve > > into Ruby. I am behind coporate firewall, I am constantly having > > touble using GEM installation. > > > > I know you will probably say GEM is easy. But, it's not easy for me. > > If it takes me more than couple hrs to know how to do it behind > > firewall, I am afraid other developers in my team will not bother to > > try it. > > > > Maybe I am missing something here. But, wouldn't we want to lower the > > barrier for people to use WATIR and even Ruby? > > > > On 4/29/06, Jonathan Kohl wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > > > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > > > Bret Pettichord > > > Sent: April 29, 2006 2:44 PM > > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer > > > > > > > > > This is a proposal for packaging Watir 1.5. > > > > > > Watir will be distributed as two files. > > > 1. watir-1.5.0.gem - A gem that can be downloaded and installed locally or > > > remotely installed over the internet (as always). > > > 2. watir-bonus.zip - A zip file containing the user guide, the examples, and > > > notes on where to find the unit tests and API docs (which are already in the > > > gem). > > > > > > The gem would be required on any machine running Watir tests. The bonus zip > > > would be recommend for any users learning Watir. > > > > > > Specifically, i am proposing that we stop distributing the one-click > > > installer. Why? > > > - The one-click installer installs the watir library and other files in > > > different locations than the gem. This can lead to confusion. > > > - The gem is becoming the standard method of installing Ruby libraries. > > > - The one-click installer could be updated to make it more consistent with > > > the gem, but no one has signed up to do this. > > > - It is simpler to just have one method of installing Watir. > > > > > > I've discussed this off line with several people, but feel like this is > > > something that requires official community review. > > > > > > Please vote on this proposal. > > > > > > Bret > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wtr-general mailing list > > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > From dave at burt.id.au Mon May 1 11:42:12 2006 From: dave at burt.id.au (Dave Burt) Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 01:42:12 +1000 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: <398ff7dc0605010831of96038ar2186fddf4e8aab62@mail.gmail.com> References: <398ff7dc0605010830v362da560m98b788a39d685167@mail.gmail.com> <398ff7dc0605010831of96038ar2186fddf4e8aab62@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44562C54.6030704@burt.id.au> Harry Chou wrote: > On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: >> I don't think GEM works easily behind Firewall/Proxy. Am I not right? > I know there perhaps are ways to get it working. I am just arguing > that this will prevent people from JUST trying Watir. You can easily download the gem and install it locally. I don't think it should be a deterrent, especially if this info is easily available. Cheers, Dave From harrychou at gmail.com Mon May 1 12:24:09 2006 From: harrychou at gmail.com (Harry Chou) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: <44562C54.6030704@burt.id.au> References: <398ff7dc0605010830v362da560m98b788a39d685167@mail.gmail.com> <398ff7dc0605010831of96038ar2186fddf4e8aab62@mail.gmail.com> <44562C54.6030704@burt.id.au> Message-ID: <398ff7dc0605010924y227af1b4s234f1669554c1812@mail.gmail.com> Alright. I haven't try that. I will give it a try. Thanks. On 5/1/06, Dave Burt wrote: > Harry Chou wrote: > > On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > >> I don't think GEM works easily behind Firewall/Proxy. Am I not right? > > I know there perhaps are ways to get it working. I am just arguing > > that this will prevent people from JUST trying Watir. > > You can easily download the gem and install it locally. I don't think it > should be a deterrent, especially if this info is easily available. > > Cheers, > Dave > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > From harrychou at gmail.com Mon May 1 12:26:05 2006 From: harrychou at gmail.com (Harry Chou) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: <398ff7dc0605010924y227af1b4s234f1669554c1812@mail.gmail.com> References: <398ff7dc0605010830v362da560m98b788a39d685167@mail.gmail.com> <398ff7dc0605010831of96038ar2186fddf4e8aab62@mail.gmail.com> <44562C54.6030704@burt.id.au> <398ff7dc0605010924y227af1b4s234f1669554c1812@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <398ff7dc0605010926o741d2bfdk4bcb4ea499cdb352@mail.gmail.com> For using this command: gem install watir -p http://user at pass:proxy-url What should I do if my username or password contains a @ character? On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > Alright. I haven't try that. I will give it a try. Thanks. > > On 5/1/06, Dave Burt wrote: > > Harry Chou wrote: > > > On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > > >> I don't think GEM works easily behind Firewall/Proxy. Am I not right? > > > I know there perhaps are ways to get it working. I am just arguing > > > that this will prevent people from JUST trying Watir. > > > > You can easily download the gem and install it locally. I don't think it > > should be a deterrent, especially if this info is easily available. > > > > Cheers, > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > From bret at pettichord.com Mon May 1 13:14:43 2006 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: <398ff7dc0605010926o741d2bfdk4bcb4ea499cdb352@mail.gmail.com> References: <398ff7dc0605010830v362da560m98b788a39d685167@mail.gmail.com> <398ff7dc0605010831of96038ar2186fddf4e8aab62@mail.gmail.com> <44562C54.6030704@burt.id.au> <398ff7dc0605010924y227af1b4s234f1669554c1812@mail.gmail.com> <398ff7dc0605010926o741d2bfdk4bcb4ea499cdb352@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Harry, Just download the gem the way you would download any other file. Then you need open a command window, and cd to the directory containing the file. Then you type "gem install watir". This command will first look in the current directory for the gem before searching for it over the internet. We will have to clearly document this procedure for those users who are new to Watir and Ruby and behind firewalls. Bret On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > > For using this command: > > gem install watir -p http://user at pass:proxy-url > > What should I do if my username or password contains a @ character? > > On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > > Alright. I haven't try that. I will give it a try. Thanks. > > > > On 5/1/06, Dave Burt wrote: > > > Harry Chou wrote: > > > > On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > > > >> I don't think GEM works easily behind Firewall/Proxy. Am I not > right? > > > > I know there perhaps are ways to get it working. I am just arguing > > > > that this will prevent people from JUST trying Watir. > > > > > > You can easily download the gem and install it locally. I don't think > it > > > should be a deterrent, especially if this info is easily available. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wtr-general mailing list > > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060501/5a3aefe9/attachment.html From Mark_Cain at rl.gov Mon May 1 10:13:22 2006 From: Mark_Cain at rl.gov (Cain, Mark) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:13:22 -0700 Subject: [Wtr-general] [ANN] RuMBA Message-ID: <9C0BD1E3DAF1204D842D72E2DCE2A04E020F76DB@EX5V.rl.gov> If you are not aware of this Microsoft change to Internet Explorer then you should be since FLASH is an ActiveX implementation in IE. The result of this change will require some human interaction (clicking the spacebar or enter key) before the FLASH object will be invoked inside IE. I don't know whether RuMBA will be directly affected by this, but thought you might like to know. Subject: Internet Explorer ActiveX Update Important Note: Please consider this version to supersede any previous version you may have received.* Summary Microsoft will be making some necessary changes to Microsoft Windows desktop operating system software related to the way in which Internet Explorer handles some web pages. The purpose of this communication is to provide additional information on the planned IE Active X update for Windows(r) client and server, and to point organizations and website developers to technical information. These changes are related to Internet Explorer and the Eolas Technologies and the Regents of the University of California v. Microsoft patent case (Eolas v. Microsoft). The IE Active X update will be rolled-up and included in the next available Internet Explorer security update, which could come as soon as the April 2006 Bulletin release. This update will be required via Windows Update and Automatic Update. Recommended Action Microsoft recommends that organizations evaluate their internal applications with this update. Testing can be done by installing the update on a client machine and navigating to web pages/applications in IE. Application owners can update their web pages using the techniques suggested on MSDN at http://msdn.microsoft.com/ieupdate, to ensure controls will function without user interaction. Customers who do not deploy the next available Internet Explorer security update, which includes the IE Active X update, will not receive the most current security patches and may put their environment at risk. Scope of Release * The IE Active X Update will affect Windows(r) XP SP2, Windows(r) Server 2003 SP1 and Windows(r) Server 2003 R2 Products (including versions of those products for Embedded Systems). o Client SKUs including Starter Edition, Home Edition, Professional, Tablet PC Edition, Media Center Edition and Professional for Embedded Systems will be updated. o Updates to Windows Server include Windows Server 2003 SP1, Windows Server 2003 R2 (CD1), and Small Business Server. * Additionally, MS plans to re-release full versions of Windows Client XP SP2, Windows Server 2003 SP1, and Windows Server 2003 R2 (including versions for Embedded Systems) to all channels (OEM, Retail, Volume Licensing) in a phased approach during the February - June 2006 timeframe. * At this time we are not releasing other downlevel versions of IE or Windows, however we may do so in the future. . Described Functionality MSDN Article: http://msdn.microsoft.com/ieupdate Knowledge Base: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/912945/en-us * Users cannot directly interact with Microsoft ActiveX controls loaded by the APPLET , EMBED , or OBJECT elements. Users can interact with such controls after activating their user interfaces. To activate an interactive control, either click it or use the TAB key to set focus on it and then press the SPACEBAR or the ENTER key. * Certain Windowed ActiveX controls still receive mouse and keyboard messages when they are disabled because they use the Windows APIs GetKeyState and GetCursorPos to obtain the system keyboard and cursor messages. For these controls only, a prompt will be shown before the control is loaded and once loaded the control will be interactive. The following CLSIDs will show a prompt. o Virtools: {C4925E65-7A1E-11D2-8BB4-00A0C9CC72C3} o Shockwave: {166B1BCA-3F9C-11CF-8075-444553540000} o Quicktime: {02BF25D5-8C17-4B23-BC80-D3488ABDDC6B} Note: We are working with the companies that provide these Active X controls, to provide technical guidance, on future versions that will be able to be activated in the page rather than prompting. * Web developers should test the code posted on MSDN and update their web pages using the techniques Microsoft suggests on MSDN at http://msdn.microsoft.com/ieupdate, to ensure controls will function without user interaction. Known Issues Please see compete list of known issues - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/912945/en-us The IE Active-X update will affect all Siebel 7 High Interactive clients. After you apply this security update, you will have to click several times to interact with the Siebel program, one time for each ActiveX control in the program. Siebel is working with Microsoft to identify a solution. A Siebel product update is expected to release in the spring of 2006. For more information about Siebel product updates, visit the following Siebel Support Web site: https://ebusiness.siebel.com/supportweb/ Key Date Summary: December 2, 2005 Microsoft held a meeting at the Silicon Valley campus to describe the upcoming changes to key External Partners, (ISVs, OEMs, Content Providers). January 9, 2005 Microsoft posted a pre-release IE Active X update for Windows XP SP2 to MSDN subscribers. February 9, 2006 Completion of Microsoft's internal software testing. February 9, 2006 Microsoft posted a pre-release IE Active X update for Windows XP SP2 (all languages) to the public MSDN site. February 28, 2006 Release of IE Active X update to Windows Update as an optional download (all languages). Technical Support In order to ensure that your technical issues are resolved in a timely manner, we request that you engage the Microsoft Product Support Services team for further assistance. Microsoft Premier customers may engage their Technical Account Manager directly or call the Microsoft Support Customer Care center. If you are not a Microsoft Premier customer you may call the Microsoft Support Customer Care center for assistance. Visit http://support.microsoft.com for more information. We value your business and are committed to customer care. Please contact us if we can assist or answer any questions. *This letter has been revised to remove references to specific dates for the security update it discusses. The previous version of this letter disclosed a proposed date for a security release. While we are confident that everything is being done to ensure the update ships, there remains a small chance that an unforeseen issue could cause a delay. This is the reason we do not provide advance notification of specific update release dates. Please consider this version to supersede any previous version you may have received. --Mark -----Original Message----- From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Paul Rogers Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:10 PM To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org Subject: [Wtr-general] [ANN] RuMBA Im pleased to announce Ive started work on RuMBA - Ruby Multiple Browser Accessor. What Is It? RuMBA will allow a watir like script to access muliple browser types - IE, FireFox etc. It will work cross platform, allowing linux and mac to be supported. Ive done enough work to think that it will work the way I expect. There is no code currently checked in. How Does It Work? At the Canada On Rails Conference in Vancouver on April 12, David HH ( the creator of rails) demonstrated some technology called Armageddon. While this is not currently available in Rails, Ive found a similar library that will allow me to do the same thing. I expect to move to Armageddon when it becomes available. Argageddon and Aflax( the library Im currently using ) use FLASH to access the dom of a web page. This is typically used to provide push functionality - ie the server is able to send data to a browser without the browser continually polling the server. We can utilise this to set fields and click buttons. The advantage is that it is cross browser, rather than being limited to Internet Explorer. ( its also fast - this being the biggest downside Ive seen to FireWatir) The DownSide to make this work cross browser, the html must contain the flash object and some javascript. The easy way is to have the server do this for you. If you are using rails, its easy. Other server technologies may be harder to have it work in test and easily switch off for a production environment. The other alternative is to do it client side, using a proxy that alters the HTML that is delivered to the browser. What Can you expect, and When. I expect the initial release will only allow finding elements using :id. Constructs like table(:id, 'xx).button(:id,'yy') are unlikely to be supported any time soon. Handling of javascript popups like alerts and file requesters is unlikely to be in anytime soon ( I have no idea how to handle this on linux or mac) The first release will be a simple demo of the technology, allowing field sets and button clicks, as well as retreiving some info about the page ( url, title etc) Im unlikely to have anything soon. Its summer, and Im generally very busy, which leaves me little time to work on this. However I know there is significant interest in the community and my various clients are also interested in having support for firefox too. Help Wanted. If you have some specific knowledge, particularly in linux or mac areas I would be interested in hearing from you. If you are able to test this on OS other than windows, I would also like to hear from you. If you have some spare time and have ruby and javascript knowledge, Ive got a big list of things that need to be done. If you can write documentation I REALLY need you! If you cant do any of the above, but know you want to do cross browser testing, please also get in contact, as just knowing what you want to do will be a big help. For now, please contact me at paul.rogers at shaw.ca - please put rumba in the subject. How this might work. This may change, its just here to show you how this thing may work. If I have 2 browsers, one IE and 1 FF: I might type ( at IRB, ignoring all the set up ) irb> rumba.clients 1... FF http://localhost:8080/test1.html 2... IE http://localhost:8080/test2.html irb> ff=rumba.attach(:instance,1) irb> ff.title A Test Page irb> ff.goto('http://localhost:8080/test3.html') ok irb> ff.button(:id , 'abutton').click you get idea I hope Paul _______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060501/0db7c716/attachment.html From bret at pettichord.com Mon May 1 13:18:41 2006 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Wtr-general] [OT] - Gem upgrade? In-Reply-To: <44561BC1.4090204@qantom.com> References: <44544D98.9070909@qantom.com> <4455C263.2050500@burt.id.au> <44561BC1.4090204@qantom.com> Message-ID: On 5/1/06, Raghu Venkataramana wrote: > > With two versions(and as time goes by it could be more than two) > of a gem library, the > script sometimes pickups the API from the wrong gem and fails. Are you sure? I have seen this happen when you have one version installed as a gem and another installed as a non-gem. If this is really happening with two gems, then it is a show-stopper problem because this is the very problem that gems were designed to solve. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060501/09d9fd0d/attachment.html From raghu at qantom.com Mon May 1 13:48:22 2006 From: raghu at qantom.com (Raghu Venkataramana) Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 23:18:22 +0530 Subject: [Wtr-general] [OT] - Gem upgrade? In-Reply-To: References: <44544D98.9070909@qantom.com> <4455C263.2050500@burt.id.au> <44561BC1.4090204@qantom.com> Message-ID: <445649E6.7050408@qantom.com> Bret Pettichord wrote: > On 5/1/06, *Raghu Venkataramana* > wrote: > > With two versions(and as time goes by it could be more than two) > of a gem library, the > script sometimes pickups the API from the wrong gem and fails. > > > Are you sure? I have seen this happen when you have one version > installed as a gem and another installed as a non-gem. > > If this is really happening with two gems, then it is a show-stopper > problem because this is the very problem that gems were designed to solve. I am not absolutely sure, but here's what happened: 1. I had a previous version of GEM installed. (0.5) 2. I then installed the latest version of GEM (0.8) and tried to run the unit tests. Unit tests failed. 3. I did a gem list - of the entries the one for wet was - wet-web (0.5, 0.8). In the ${ruby_gem} directory, there were two wet-web directories 4. Since these tests _could not_ have passed in 0.5, I thought that the problem was due to the two gem files trying to co-exist. 5. I did a gem uninstall wet-web -a. 6. I then installed 0.8 gem again and ran the unit tests. This time, the tests passed. My guess is that the problem happened due to the fact that there were both the gems installed on the system and the tests were trying to access the wrong version. (However I didn't do a good tester's job by trying to reproduce the problem. I was simply happy that everything worked for me and forgot about it) Raghu > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Wtr-general mailing list >Wtr-general at rubyforge.org >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > From tester.paul at gmail.com Mon May 1 13:48:39 2006 From: tester.paul at gmail.com (Paul Carvalho) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: References: <398ff7dc0605010830v362da560m98b788a39d685167@mail.gmail.com> <398ff7dc0605010831of96038ar2186fddf4e8aab62@mail.gmail.com> <44562C54.6030704@burt.id.au> <398ff7dc0605010924y227af1b4s234f1669554c1812@mail.gmail.com> <398ff7dc0605010926o741d2bfdk4bcb4ea499cdb352@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <37c405480605011048u7c12de82jc14adc41fbb02982@mail.gmail.com> You could also create a batch file called 'install.bat' that simply has the "gem install watir" command. On 01/05/06, Bret Pettichord wrote: > > Harry, > > Just download the gem the way you would download any other file. > > Then you need open a command window, and cd to the directory containing > the file. > > Then you type "gem install watir". This command will first look in the > current directory for the gem before searching for it over the internet. > > We will have to clearly document this procedure for those users who are > new to Watir and Ruby and behind firewalls. > > Bret > > > On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > > > > For using this command: > > > > gem install watir -p http://user at pass:proxy-url > > > > What should I do if my username or password contains a @ character? > > > > On 5/1/06, Harry Chou < harrychou at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Alright. I haven't try that. I will give it a try. Thanks. > > > > > > On 5/1/06, Dave Burt wrote: > > > > Harry Chou wrote: > > > > > On 5/1/06, Harry Chou wrote: > > > > >> I don't think GEM works easily behind Firewall/Proxy. Am I not > > right? > > > > > I know there perhaps are ways to get it working. I am just arguing > > > > > > > that this will prevent people from JUST trying Watir. > > > > > > > > You can easily download the gem and install it locally. I don't > > think it > > > > should be a deterrent, especially if this info is easily available. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Wtr-general mailing list > > > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060501/464447af/attachment.html From bret at pettichord.com Mon May 1 15:35:57 2006 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Wtr-general] [ANN] RuMBA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 4/30/06, Paul Rogers wrote: > > The DownSide > > to make this work cross browser, the html must contain the flash object > and some javascript. The easy way is to have the server do this for you. If > you are using rails, its easy. Other server technologies may be harder to > have it work in test and easily switch off for a production environment. > The other alternative is to do it client side, using a proxy that alters > the HTML that is delivered to the browser. I'm curious why you aren't using Selenium RC? The main drawback to it is that it also requires a server-side implant, but you seem to be willing to do that. On the other hand, it is open source and supports lots of browsers, not just Firefox and IE. I figured a Watir-like Ruby interface to Selenium RC would be easier. Bret -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060501/d35e9480/attachment.html From bret at pettichord.com Mon May 1 22:29:12 2006 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Wtr-general] Tracking down xpath bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm also seeing this error. I had to get click a dialog to stop seeing the javascript/missing image errors. Bret On 4/29/06, Charley Baker wrote: > > Hrrrm, I'm getting errors running the test, main results: 2 tests, 1 > assertion, 1 failure, 1 error. Images are missing on the html page under > test: list_matter.html. They all refer to AIMS/images/... > > Error 1 listed at the bottom. > Here's how I installed: > - Deleted Watir and Rexml files from my Ruby install. > - Pulled Watir from HEAD, ran 'gem build' against the watir.gemspec to > create watir-1.5.0.971.gem. Installed the gem. > - Downloaded rexml and installed 3.1.4 from bin/install.rb. > - Sanity version checking: > require 'watir' > require 'rexml/rexml' > > p "Watir version: " + Watir::IE::VERSION > p "Rexml version: " + REXML::Version > p "Platform: " + PLATFORM > > => "Watir version: 1.5.0.971" > "Rexml version: 3.1.4" > "Platform: i386-mswin32" > > I'm continuing to work on it, but this is what I'm getting now. > > Error 1: > 1) Error: > test_div_with_contains(TC_Divs_XPath2): > NoMethodError: undefined method `include?' for nil:NilClass > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/functions.rb:142:in > `contains' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:451:in `send' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:451:in `expr' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:438:in > `each_with_i > ndex' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:438:in `each' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:438:in > `each_with_i > ndex' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:438:in `expr' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:387:in `expr' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:283:in `expr' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:277:in > `each_with_i > ndex' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:277:in `each' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:277:in > `each_with_i > ndex' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:277:in `expr' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:488:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `each_index' > > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in > `d_o_s' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:476:in > `descendant_ > or_self' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:315:in `expr' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:125:in > `match' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:56:in `parse' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath.rb:53:in `each' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/element.rb:939:in `each' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.971 > /unittests/../watir.rb:195 > 4:in `elements_by_xpath' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.971 > /unittests/../watir.rb:194 > 4:in `element_by_xpath' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.971 > /unittests/../watir.rb:268 > 2:in `locate' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.971 > /unittests/../watir.rb:215 > 1:in `assert_exists' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir- 1.5.0.971 > /unittests/../watir.rb:221 > 9:in `text' > C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.971 > /unittests/div2_xpath_test > .rb:19:in `test_div_with_contains' > > On 4/29/06, Bret Pettichord wrote: > > > Angrez and i are getting different results when we execute > div2_xpath_test.rb. > > I'd appreciate it if others could get the latest code from HEAD, execute > this test, and tell us what happens. You'll have to install REXML 3.1.4first. > > Bret > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060501/2e68bc63/attachment.html From zeljko.filipin at gmail.com Tue May 2 03:21:16 2006 From: zeljko.filipin at gmail.com (Zeljko Filipin) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:21:16 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-general] Using the OpenQA Forums In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sounds good to me. On 4/29/06, Bret Pettichord wrote:> I suggest that we make use of the Open QA Forums. The details of this> suggestion are below. But first, some background.>> The wtr-general mailing list>> On several occassions the Watir community has clearly indicated that> it did not want to see separate lists for users and> developers. Instead we have a common mailing list called wtr-general> hosted at Rubyforge.org. This mailing list is open to anybody and only> accepts posts from members. It is very active and encourages> discussions of testing with Ruby whether or not Watir is specifically> being used.>> List maintenance is minor; mostly it consists of approving occassional> posts that have either large attachments (over 40 KB) or are from> members who are using a different email address from their> subscription (although i wouldn't mind another volunteer to help with> this).>> The biggest drawback to the list is the difficulty of searching the> archives. However, this is a less of a problem than it used to be> because we've added a search feature to the project web page, and the> list is also mirrored to another site with better archiving.>> For further details, see> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general>> The Current OpenQA Watir Forums>> The standard Open QA hosting arrangement includes two web-based> forums, one for users and one for developers. These were set up for> Watir when we first set up at Open QA, but they have gone largely> unused and neglected.>> According to the Open QA website, there are also corresponding mailing> lists for these forums, but in my discussions with Patrick, I> understood that these haven't actually been set up. He also tells us> that he can synchronize forums with existing email lists hosted at> other sites.>> These forums have the advantage of being easy to browse and search for> casual users. They also have an interesting feature that allows> tracking which questions have been answered and who is answering the> most questions. And they offer RSS feeds, which offers an alternative> way of tracking a discussion without subscribing.>> For details, see> http://forums.openqa.org/category.jspa?categoryID=4>> The Proposal>> I am proposing that the current wtr-general mailing list be mirrored> at OpenQA. The Watir community has recently requested that we create a> new mailing to handle support of the Watir code currently in> development (namely Watir 1.5 and FireWatir). I am proposing that a> new list be created at Rubyforge (wtr-development) and that it be> mirrored by a new forum at OpenQA (Watir Development).>> The following is a detailed action plan for how to make this all> happen. If this plan is approved by the community, i will work with> Patrick and Charley on the implementation.>> Setting Up Watir General>> 1. Delete the Watir Users and Watir Developers Forums.> 2. Create a new Forum called Watir General.> 3. Set up Watir General to include the traffic from wtr-general.> 4. Get the pre-transfer archives of wtr-general from rubyforge and> have these placed in the Watir General Archives.>> Setting Up Watir Development>> 1. Create a new mailing list wtr-development at Rubyforge.> 2. Create a new Forum at OpenQA called Watir Development.> 3. Open up the list to new subscribers.>>> _______________________________________________> Wtr-general mailing list> Wtr-general at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general>> --http://www.testingreflections.com/blog/3071 From zeljko.filipin at gmail.com Tue May 2 03:25:47 2006 From: zeljko.filipin at gmail.com (Zeljko Filipin) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:25:47 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames In-Reply-To: <416BE996E3CA9548819C278CE307B1D31F1093@MERCMBX03.na.sas.com> References: <416BE996E3CA9548819C278CE307B1D31F1093@MERCMBX03.na.sas.com> Message-ID: Maybe this will help.http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/FAQ#FAQ-Accessdeniedwhentryingtoaccessaframe On 4/30/06, George Flaherty wrote:> I am currently evaluating Watir for one of our web based applications. The application I am using for evaluation of watir contains quite a bit of frame sets. Now when I try to determine the HTMLinks within the frames I get --Access Denied--?>> Am I doing something wrong, or missing? Maybe and outdated version of Watir?>> Thanks> -george>> Version Info:> ===========> Watir 1.4.1> Ruby 1.8.2> IE 6.0.2900.>> Here is my simple test:> =======================> require 'watir'>> ie = Watir::IE.attach(:title,/Marketmax - Integrated Mer/)> ie.show_frames>>> Here is the error I am receiving:> =======================> W, [29-Apr-2006 08:51:34#3756] WARN -- : frame error in waitdocument> OLE error code:80070005 in > Access is denied.>>> HRESULT error code:0x80020009> Exception occurred.> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1405:in `method_missing'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1405:in `wait'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1404:in `upto'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1404:in `wait'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1113:in `attach_init'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1104:in `attach'> C:/georgef/work/MATS2.1-Ezrah/scripts/watir/IMPS-Web61/Sandbox.rb:3> there are 2 frames> frame index: 1 --Access Denied--> frame index: 2 --Access Denied-->>>>>> _______________________________________________> Wtr-general mailing list> Wtr-general at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general> --http://www.testingreflections.com/blog/3071 From zeljko.filipin at gmail.com Tue May 2 03:38:30 2006 From: zeljko.filipin at gmail.com (Zeljko Filipin) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:38:30 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-general] The Watir Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 On 4/29/06, Bret Pettichord wrote:> This is a proposal for packaging Watir 1.5.>> Watir will be distributed as two files.> 1. watir-1.5.0.gem - A gem that can be downloaded and installed locally or> remotely installed over the internet (as always).> 2. watir-bonus.zip - A zip file containing the user guide, the examples,> and notes on where to find the unit tests and API docs (which are already in> the gem).>> The gem would be required on any machine running Watir tests. The bonus zip> would be recommend for any users learning Watir.>> Specifically, i am proposing that we stop distributing the one-click> installer. Why?> - The one-click installer installs the watir library and other files in> different locations than the gem. This can lead to confusion.> - The gem is becoming the standard method of installing Ruby libraries.> - The one-click installer could be updated to make it more consistent with> the gem, but no one has signed up to do this.> - It is simpler to just have one method of installing Watir.>> I've discussed this off line with several people, but feel like this is> something that requires official community review.>> Please vote on this proposal.>> Bret>> _______________________________________________> Wtr-general mailing list> Wtr-general at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general>> --http://www.testingreflections.com/blog/3071 From zeljko.filipin at gmail.com Tue May 2 04:22:22 2006 From: zeljko.filipin at gmail.com (Zeljko Filipin) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 10:22:22 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-general] Tracking down xpath bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I had to disable "Display a notification about every script error"(Tools > Internet Options > Advanced > Browsing) because several errorreporting pop-ups appeared. irb(main):004:0* p "Watir version: " + Watir::IE::VERSION"Watir version: 1.5.0.973"irb(main):005:0> p "Rexml version: " + REXML::Version"Rexml version: 3.1.4"irb(main):006:0> p "Platform: " + PLATFORM"Platform: i386-mswin32" C:\ruby\lib\ruby\gems\1.8\gems\watir-1.5.0.973\unittests>div2_xpath_test.rbLoaded suite C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.973/unittests/div2_xpath_testStartedEFFinished in 5.404 seconds. 1) Error:test_div_with_contains(TC_Divs_XPath2):NoMethodError: undefined method `include?' for nil:NilClass c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/functions.rb:142:in `contains' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:451:in `send' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:451:in `expr' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:438:in`each_with_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:438:in `each' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:438:in`each_with_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:438:in `expr' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:387:in `expr' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:283:in `expr' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:277:in`each_with_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:277:in `each' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:277:in`each_with_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:277:in `expr' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:488:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:490:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `each_index' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:485:in `d_o_s' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:476:in`descendant_or_self' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:315:in `expr' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:125:in `match' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath_parser.rb:56:in `parse' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath.rb:53:in `each' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/element.rb:939:in `each' C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.973/unittests/../watir.rb:1954:in`elements_by_xpath' C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.973/unittests/../watir.rb:1944:in`element_by_xpath' C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.973/unittests/../watir.rb:2682:in`locate' C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.973/unittests/../watir.rb:2151:in`assert_exists' C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.973/unittests/../watir.rb:2219:in`text' C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.973/unittests/div2_xpath_test.rb:19:in`test_div_with_contains' 2) Failure:test_div_with_text(TC_Divs_XPath2)[C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.0.973/unittests/div2_xpath_test.rb:14]:<"Add"> expected but was<"Open | Closed | All">. 2 tests, 1 assertions, 1 failures, 1 errors From George.Flaherty at sas.com Tue May 2 08:06:20 2006 From: George.Flaherty at sas.com (George Flaherty) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames Message-ID: <416BE996E3CA9548819C278CE307B1D31F19CE@MERCMBX03.na.sas.com> That was it! I included my server domains within the "Trusted" sites under IE security, and now the frames and links within the frames are visible to me! Thanks! -george -----Original Message----- From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Zeljko Filipin Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 3:26 AM To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames Maybe this will help.http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/FAQ#FAQ-Accessdeniedwhentryingtoaccessaframe On 4/30/06, George Flaherty wrote:> I am currently evaluating Watir for one of our web based applications. The application I am using for evaluation of watir contains quite a bit of frame sets. Now when I try to determine the HTMLinks within the frames I get --Access Denied--?>> Am I doing something wrong, or missing? Maybe and outdated version of Watir?>> Thanks> -george>> Version Info:> ===========> Watir 1.4.1> Ruby 1.8.2> IE 6.0.2900.>> Here is my simple test:> =======================> require 'watir'>> ie = Watir::IE.attach(:title,/Marketmax - Integrated Mer/)> ie.show_frames>>> Here is the error I am receiving:> =======================> W, [29-Apr-2006 08:51:34#3756] WARN -- : frame error in waitdocument> OLE error code:80070005 in > Access is denied.>>> HRESULT error code:0x80020009> Exception occurred.> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1405:in `method_missing'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/wati! r.rb:1405:in `wait'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1404:in `upto'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1404:in `wait'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1113:in `attach_init'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1104:in `attach'> C:/georgef/work/MATS2.1-Ezrah/scripts/watir/IMPS-Web61/Sandbox.rb:3> there are 2 frames> frame index: 1 --Access Denied--> frame index: 2 --Access Denied-->>>>>> _______________________________________________> Wtr-general mailing list> Wtr-general at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general> --http://www.testingreflections.com/blog/3071 _______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general From mb at michaelbolton.net Tue May 2 13:45:04 2006 From: mb at michaelbolton.net (Michael Bolton) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <00c801c66e10$255b4b70$6601a8c0@Koko> It clearly helps some people. I wonder if the error message could include the suggestion to add the server to the trusted site? (I'll volunteer to help with the writing of it.) ---Michael B. -----Original Message----- From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Zeljko Filipin Sent: May 2, 2006 3:26 AM To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames Maybe this will help.http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/FAQ#FAQ-Accessdeniedwhentryingtoacce ssaframe On 4/30/06, George Flaherty wrote:> I am currently evaluating Watir for one of our web based applications. The application I am using for evaluation of watir contains quite a bit of frame sets. Now when I try to determine the HTMLinks within the frames I get --Access Denied--?>> Am I doing something wrong, or missing? Maybe and outdated version of Watir?>> Thanks> -george>> Version Info:> ===========> Watir 1.4.1> Ruby 1.8.2> IE 6.0.2900.>> Here is my simple test:> =======================> require 'watir'>> ie = Watir::IE.attach(:title,/Marketmax - Integrated Mer/)> ie.show_frames>>> Here is the error I am receiving:> =======================> W, [29-Apr-2006 08:51:34#3756] WARN -- : frame error in waitdocument> OLE error code:80070005 in > Access is denied.>>> HRESULT error code:0x80020009> Exception occurred.> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1405:in `method_missing'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/wati! r.rb:1405:in `wait'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1404:in `upto'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1404:in `wait'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1113:in `attach_init'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1104:in `attach'> C:/georgef/work/MATS2.1-Ezrah/scripts/watir/IMPS-Web61/Sandbox.rb:3> there are 2 frames> frame index: 1 --Access Denied--> frame index: 2 --Access Denied-->>>>>> _______________________________________________> Wtr-general mailing list> Wtr-general at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general> --http://www.testingreflections.com/blog/3071 _______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general From bret at pettichord.com Tue May 2 15:01:14 2006 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:01:14 -0500 Subject: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames In-Reply-To: <00c801c66e10$255b4b70$6601a8c0@Koko> References: <00c801c66e10$255b4b70$6601a8c0@Koko> Message-ID: I've changed this error message to say "Access Denied, see http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/FAQ#FAQ-Accessdeniedwhentryingtoaccessaframe " Please rephrase this wiki page if you have a better suggestion for the advice people should get in this situation. Bret On 5/2/06, Michael Bolton wrote: > > It clearly helps some people. I wonder if the error message could include > the suggestion to add the server to the trusted site? (I'll volunteer to > help with the writing of it.) > > ---Michael B. > > -----Original Message----- > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Zeljko Filipin > Sent: May 2, 2006 3:26 AM > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames > > Maybe this will > help > .http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/FAQ#FAQ-Accessdeniedwhentryingtoacce > ssaframe > On 4/30/06, George Flaherty wrote:> I am > currently > evaluating Watir for one of our web based applications. The application I > am > using for evaluation of watir contains quite a bit of frame sets. Now when > I > try to determine the HTMLinks within the frames I get --Access Denied--?>> > Am I doing something wrong, or missing? Maybe and outdated version of > Watir?>> Thanks> -george>> Version Info:> ===========> Watir 1.4.1> Ruby > 1.8.2> IE 6.0.2900.>> Here is my simple test:> =======================> > require 'watir'>> ie = Watir::IE.attach(:title,/Marketmax - Integrated > Mer/)> ie.show_frames>>> Here is the error I am receiving:> > =======================> W, [29-Apr-2006 08:51:34#3756] WARN -- : frame > error in waitdocument> OLE error code:80070005 in > > Access is denied.>>> HRESULT error code:0x80020009> Exception > occurred.> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1405:in > `method_missing'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/wati! > r.rb:1405:in `wait'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1404:in > `upto'> C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1404:in `wait'> > C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1113:in `attach_init'> > C:/usr/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:1104:in `attach'> > C:/georgef/work/MATS2.1-Ezrah/scripts/watir/IMPS-Web61/Sandbox.rb:3> there > are 2 frames> frame index: 1 --Access Denied--> frame index: 2 --Access > Denied-->>>>>> _______________________________________________> > Wtr-general > mailing list> Wtr-general at rubyforge.org> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general> > > --http://www.testingreflections.com/blog/3071 > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060502/941ce237/attachment.html From tester.paul at gmail.com Tue May 2 15:48:50 2006 From: tester.paul at gmail.com (Paul Carvalho) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames In-Reply-To: References: <00c801c66e10$255b4b70$6601a8c0@Koko> Message-ID: <37c405480605021248j3c46290etc1934a6249b8d497@mail.gmail.com> Just for the record, none of the advice in this FAQ entry have helped me get rid of this error. =( I'm not trying to navigate to a frame on another site, but the two outside (empty) frames are hosted on a separate resource web site. When I check the frames, I see the following output: ---- irb(main):128:0> ie.show_frames there are 4 frames frame index: 1 --Access Denied-- frame index: 2 name: FooBar frame index: 3 name: MainWindow frame index: 4 --Access Denied-- => 0..3 ---- I get these "Access is Denied" warnings randomly when I click buttons and follow links in the 'MainWindow' frame. This frame is hosted on the same site, so I don't know why the warning messages keep appearing. I've tried everything in the FAQ but to no avail: 1. Navigate directly to the subframe.. --> Not relevant. I'm not navigating to a different subframe. 2. Add host to the Trusted Sites list. --> Did it. No effect. Warnings still appear. 3. Place entry in Hosts file. --> Same as (2) - no effect. 4. Set IE to "Low" Security Level zone setting --> Can't do it. Corporate Security Policy enforces a minimum "Medium" value, so I can never set it to "Low". This is why I need to spend time figuring out how to write the UnitTest output to a file -- so I can eliminate all these annoying Warnings. I even tried launching ruby with a quiet verbose setting but it had no effect. I have been totally unable to suppress these warnings. In the end I've come to live with them, but I can't help but think that there must be something that can be done in the code to suppress these Warnings. Unfortunately, I'm too focussed on testing and/or solving the scripting problems to figure out how to eliminate these errors. They're annoying but so are mosquitos in the summer time. Oh well. Just thought you should know that the FAQ entry doesn't help me in my situation. Paul. On 02/05/06, Bret Pettichord wrote: > > I've changed this error message to say > "Access Denied, see http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/FAQ#FAQ-Accessdeniedwhentryingtoaccessaframe > " > > Please rephrase this wiki page if you have a better suggestion for the > advice people should get in this situation. > > Bret > > > On 5/2/06, Michael Bolton wrote: > > > > It clearly helps some people. I wonder if the error message could > > include > > the suggestion to add the server to the trusted site? (I'll volunteer > > to > > help with the writing of it.) > > > > ---Michael B. > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060502/d0e63235/attachment.html From bret at pettichord.com Wed May 3 01:11:27 2006 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 00:11:27 -0500 Subject: [Wtr-general] Development Gem Released Message-ID: Updated Development Gem is available for testing. http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Development+Builds Key features - Simple install of xpath support. Only requires Rexml 3.1.4 (no hand modifications required). - Modal dialog support -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/dad5e627/attachment.html From Christian.Kreutzer at t-systems.com Wed May 3 05:42:30 2006 From: Christian.Kreutzer at t-systems.com (Kreutzer, Christian) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:42:30 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-general] [ANN] RuMBA Message-ID: i was about to ask the same question. with Selenium-RC there is already a tool with support for lots of browsers which can be driven by various scripting/programming languages. Selenium-RC doenst need the server-side implant Bret mentioned in his post anymore since it comes with its own java based reverse proxy. -Christian _____ Von: Bret Pettichord [mailto:bret at pettichord.com] Gesendet: Montag, 1. Mai 2006 21:36 An: wtr-general at rubyforge.org Betreff: Re: [Wtr-general] [ANN] RuMBA On 4/30/06, Paul Rogers > wrote: The DownSide to make this work cross browser, the html must contain the flash object and some javascript. The easy way is to have the server do this for you. If you are using rails, its easy. Other server technologies may be harder to have it work in test and easily switch off for a production environment. The other alternative is to do it client side, using a proxy that alters the HTML that is delivered to the browser. I'm curious why you aren't using Selenium RC? The main drawback to it is that it also requires a server-side implant, but you seem to be willing to do that. On the other hand, it is open source and supports lots of browsers, not just Firefox and IE. I figured a Watir-like Ruby interface to Selenium RC would be easier. Bret -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/cd3b25f3/attachment.html From Adrian.Rutter at tnt.com Wed May 3 06:34:22 2006 From: Adrian.Rutter at tnt.com (Adrian Rutter) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:34:22 +0100 Subject: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE Message-ID: Hi, I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir tests. I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby 1.8.3. Cheers Aidy --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From zeljko.filipin at gmail.com Wed May 3 06:41:56 2006 From: zeljko.filipin at gmail.com (Zeljko Filipin) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:41:56 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Take a look here: http://www.mail-archive.com/wtr-general at rubyforge.org/msg02244.html Zeljko On 5/3/06, Adrian Rutter wrote: > > > Hi, > > I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir tests. > I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby 1.8.3. > > Cheers > > Aidy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/305b2819/attachment.html From zeljko.filipin at gmail.com Wed May 3 07:03:08 2006 From: zeljko.filipin at gmail.com (Zeljko Filipin) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:03:08 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: There is beta version of new arachno at http://www.ruby-ide.com/forum/showthread.php?t=179 I remember Lothar said that new version would support Ruby 1.8.3. and higher (but I do not know if this is already implemented). On 5/3/06, Adrian Rutter wrote: > > > I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby 1.8.3. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/0395a7ea/attachment.html From tester.paul at gmail.com Wed May 3 09:47:09 2006 From: tester.paul at gmail.com (Paul Carvalho) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <37c405480605030647u3506dff2gefed18855305b432@mail.gmail.com> I've been using SciTE. Until now I haven't heard of Arachno Ruby.. maybe I'll check it out. Every time I try FreeRIDE it always disappoints me. I tried it again just now - it doesn't like my dual monitor setup (does weird things with the menus), and it hangs for some reason in the middle of my scripts. The scripts run perfectly when I run them from a command line or SciTE, so I blame the hack'ish IDE. A good debugger would certainly be useful. On 03/05/06, Adrian Rutter wrote: > > > Hi, > > I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir tests. > I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby 1.8.3. > > Cheers > > Aidy > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/7a75a44b/attachment.html From Bill.Attebery at twtelecom.com Wed May 3 09:46:33 2006 From: Bill.Attebery at twtelecom.com (Attebery, Bill) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 07:46:33 -0600 Subject: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE Message-ID: Which versions of Ruby does Watir support -- for some reason I was under the impression it was only 1.8.2 _____ From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Zeljko Filipin Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 5:03 AM To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE There is beta version of new arachno at http://www.ruby-ide.com/forum/showthread.php?t=179 I remember Lothar said that new version would support Ruby 1.8.3. and higher (but I do not know if this is already implemented). On 5/3/06, Adrian Rutter wrote: I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby 1.8.3. The content contained in this electronic message is not intended to constitute formation of a contract binding TWTC. TWTC will be contractually bound only upon execution, by an authorized officer, of a contract including agreed terms and conditions or by express application of its tariffs. This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/7edf146a/attachment.html From Mark_Cain at rl.gov Wed May 3 10:07:47 2006 From: Mark_Cain at rl.gov (Cain, Mark) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 07:07:47 -0700 Subject: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE Message-ID: <9C0BD1E3DAF1204D842D72E2DCE2A04E020F76DF@EX5V.rl.gov> Komodo is a pretty good IDE and has a good debugger but the personal version cost 30 buck-I have also had some performance problems with this IDE with Watir version 1.5.x. If you want free, try Eclipse with the RDE and the SVN plug-ins. Eclipse is the one I end up using the most. --Mark ________________________________ From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Paul Carvalho Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:47 AM To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE I've been using SciTE. Until now I haven't heard of Arachno Ruby.. maybe I'll check it out. Every time I try FreeRIDE it always disappoints me. I tried it again just now - it doesn't like my dual monitor setup (does weird things with the menus), and it hangs for some reason in the middle of my scripts. The scripts run perfectly when I run them from a command line or SciTE, so I blame the hack'ish IDE. A good debugger would certainly be useful. On 03/05/06, Adrian Rutter wrote: Hi, I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir tests. I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby 1.8.3. Cheers Aidy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/fc0ba4f6/attachment.html From zeljko.filipin at gmail.com Wed May 3 10:07:17 2006 From: zeljko.filipin at gmail.com (Zeljko Filipin) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 16:07:17 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I have tried it with 1.8.3. and 1.8.4. and it worked. On 5/3/06, Attebery, Bill wrote: > > Which versions of Ruby does Watir support -- for some reason I was under > the impression it was only 1.8.2 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/160bb882/attachment.html From jeff.darklight at gmail.com Wed May 3 10:07:58 2006 From: jeff.darklight at gmail.com (Jeff Wood) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 07:07:58 -0700 Subject: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE In-Reply-To: <9C0BD1E3DAF1204D842D72E2DCE2A04E020F76DF@EX5V.rl.gov> References: <9C0BD1E3DAF1204D842D72E2DCE2A04E020F76DF@EX5V.rl.gov> Message-ID: There have only been a few times where having a graphical way to dig through a data structure helped any more than simply using Emacs & breakpoint. --jw. On 5/3/06, Cain, Mark wrote: > > > > Komodo is a pretty good IDE and has a good debugger but the personal version > cost 30 buck?I have also had some performance problems with this IDE with > Watir version 1.5.x. If you want free, try Eclipse with the RDE and the SVN > plug-ins. Eclipse is the one I end up using the most. > > > > > > --Mark > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > Paul Carvalho > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:47 AM > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE > > > > > > > > I've been using SciTE. Until now I haven't heard of Arachno Ruby.. maybe > I'll check it out. > > Every time I try FreeRIDE it always disappoints me. I tried it again just > now - it doesn't like my dual monitor setup (does weird things with the > menus), and it hangs for some reason in the middle of my scripts. The > scripts run perfectly when I run them from a command line or SciTE, so I > blame the hack'ish IDE. > > A good debugger would certainly be useful. > > > > > > On 03/05/06, Adrian Rutter wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir tests. > I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby 1.8.3. > > Cheers > > Aidy > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > From jeff.darklight at gmail.com Wed May 3 10:09:06 2006 From: jeff.darklight at gmail.com (Jeff Wood) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 07:09:06 -0700 Subject: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE In-Reply-To: References: <9C0BD1E3DAF1204D842D72E2DCE2A04E020F76DF@EX5V.rl.gov> Message-ID: But, I do own both Komodo & Arachno ... Arachno does have the nicest debugger. and Komodo does deal with multiple languages ( especially XML/XSLT ) ... which is nice to have. ... anyways. just brain dumping for y'all. --jw. On 5/3/06, Jeff Wood wrote: > There have only been a few times where having a graphical way to dig > through a data structure helped any more than simply using Emacs & > breakpoint. > > --jw. > > On 5/3/06, Cain, Mark wrote: > > > > > > > > Komodo is a pretty good IDE and has a good debugger but the personal version > > cost 30 buck?I have also had some performance problems with this IDE with > > Watir version 1.5.x. If you want free, try Eclipse with the RDE and the SVN > > plug-ins. Eclipse is the one I end up using the most. > > > > > > > > > > > > --Mark > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > > Paul Carvalho > > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:47 AM > > > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been using SciTE. Until now I haven't heard of Arachno Ruby.. maybe > > I'll check it out. > > > > Every time I try FreeRIDE it always disappoints me. I tried it again just > > now - it doesn't like my dual monitor setup (does weird things with the > > menus), and it hangs for some reason in the middle of my scripts. The > > scripts run perfectly when I run them from a command line or SciTE, so I > > blame the hack'ish IDE. > > > > A good debugger would certainly be useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 03/05/06, Adrian Rutter wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir tests. > > I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby 1.8.3. > > > > Cheers > > > > Aidy > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > From PGarigue at EXTEND.COM Wed May 3 10:27:21 2006 From: PGarigue at EXTEND.COM (Pierre Garigue) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 10:27:21 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] [War-general] Ruby IDE Message-ID: about debugging - PP is your friend. Every time I need to print debug info from inside a program, I use pp rather than puts. I use pretty large data structure and without pp I would be lost. I found this on using Breakpoint http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoDebugWithBreakpoint . It's from using it in a Rails context but it may be useful cheers Pierre -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Wood [mailto:jeff.darklight at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:08 AM To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE There have only been a few times where having a graphical way to dig through a data structure helped any more than simply using Emacs & breakpoint. --jw. On 5/3/06, Cain, Mark wrote: > > > > Komodo is a pretty good IDE and has a good debugger but the personal version > cost 30 buck?I have also had some performance problems with this IDE with > Watir version 1.5.x. If you want free, try Eclipse with the RDE and the SVN > plug-ins. Eclipse is the one I end up using the most. > > > > > > --Mark > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > Paul Carvalho > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:47 AM > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE > > > > > > > > I've been using SciTE. Until now I haven't heard of Arachno Ruby.. maybe > I'll check it out. > > Every time I try FreeRIDE it always disappoints me. I tried it again just > now - it doesn't like my dual monitor setup (does weird things with the > menus), and it hangs for some reason in the middle of my scripts. The > scripts run perfectly when I run them from a command line or SciTE, so I > blame the hack'ish IDE. > > A good debugger would certainly be useful. > > > > > > On 03/05/06, Adrian Rutter wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir tests. > I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby 1.8.3. > > Cheers > > Aidy > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > _______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general From rodrigo.martin at enratio.com Wed May 3 10:33:16 2006 From: rodrigo.martin at enratio.com (Rodrigo Julian Martin) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:33:16 -0300 Subject: [Wtr-general] Help needed with text_edits and IFRAME Message-ID: Hello Everybody! I have 2 problems, hope some of you guys can give me a hand... 1) I have six input boxes (text_fields), that has the same name. How can I identify them uniquely? I've seen the properties of each text_fields and can't find one for identify them.. The ID changes dinamically... Can I refer them by :index and :name? 2) And... I have an IFRAME (is like an text_area that allows you to write a description). But I don't know how to refer it with watir... With a find tool i have this info about it: Page(url).document.frames.editCtl.document.all.BODY Thanks in advance.. Cheers! Rodrigo Julian Martin. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/8e370e20/attachment.html From bret at pettichord.com Wed May 3 10:48:11 2006 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:48:11 -0500 Subject: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames In-Reply-To: <37c405480605021248j3c46290etc1934a6249b8d497@mail.gmail.com> References: <00c801c66e10$255b4b70$6601a8c0@Koko> <37c405480605021248j3c46290etc1934a6249b8d497@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Paul, Thanks for sharing your story. It's a good example for why it is really hard to include solutions in error messages. I did not realize that these warnings were bothering you. It is easy to suppress them. Watir uses a Logger object to do the logging. By default, it set to warn, and this is a warn message. You could provide your own, customized logger to Watir or change the settings on the default one in play. Something like ie.logger.level = Logger::ERROR might work. For details, see http://www.ruby-doc.org/stdlib/libdoc/logger/rdoc/index.html Let us know what works for you and we'll add it to the FAQ. Bret On 5/2/06, Paul Carvalho wrote: > > Just for the record, none of the advice in this FAQ entry have helped me > get rid of this error. =( > > I'm not trying to navigate to a frame on another site, but the two outside > (empty) frames are hosted on a separate resource web site. When I check the > frames, I see the following output: > ---- > irb(main):128:0> ie.show_frames > there are 4 frames > > frame index: 1 --Access Denied-- > frame index: 2 name: FooBar > frame index: 3 name: MainWindow > frame index: 4 --Access Denied-- > => 0..3 > ---- > > I get these "Access is Denied" warnings randomly when I click buttons and > follow links in the 'MainWindow' frame. This frame is hosted on the same > site, so I don't know why the warning messages keep appearing. > > I've tried everything in the FAQ but to no avail: > > 1. Navigate directly to the subframe.. > --> Not relevant. I'm not navigating to a different subframe. > > 2. Add host to the Trusted Sites list. > --> Did it. No effect. Warnings still appear. > > 3. Place entry in Hosts file. > --> Same as (2) - no effect. > > 4. Set IE to "Low" Security Level zone setting > --> Can't do it. Corporate Security Policy enforces a minimum "Medium" > value, so I can never set it to "Low". > > This is why I need to spend time figuring out how to write the UnitTest > output to a file -- so I can eliminate all these annoying Warnings. I even > tried launching ruby with a quiet verbose setting but it had no effect. I > have been totally unable to suppress these warnings. > > In the end I've come to live with them, but I can't help but think that > there must be something that can be done in the code to suppress these > Warnings. Unfortunately, I'm too focussed on testing and/or solving the > scripting problems to figure out how to eliminate these errors. They're > annoying but so are mosquitos in the summer time. Oh well. > > Just thought you should know that the FAQ entry doesn't help me in my > situation. > > Paul. > > > > On 02/05/06, Bret Pettichord < bret at pettichord.com> wrote: > > > > I've changed this error message to say > > "Access Denied, see http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/FAQ#FAQ-Accessdeniedwhentryingtoaccessaframe > > " > > > > Please rephrase this wiki page if you have a better suggestion for the > > advice people should get in this situation. > > > > Bret > > > > > > On 5/2/06, Michael Bolton wrote: > > > > > > It clearly helps some people. I wonder if the error message could > > > include > > > the suggestion to add the server to the trusted site? (I'll volunteer > > > to > > > help with the writing of it.) > > > > > > ---Michael B. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/dfbc365f/attachment.html From tester.paul at gmail.com Wed May 3 11:28:47 2006 From: tester.paul at gmail.com (Paul Carvalho) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames In-Reply-To: References: <00c801c66e10$255b4b70$6601a8c0@Koko> <37c405480605021248j3c46290etc1934a6249b8d497@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <37c405480605030828r23d827e9pa2b8f57ee3bf57c4@mail.gmail.com> Hooo-rahh! You can't see it, but there are tears of joy in my eyes! Thank you! That line works perfectly in my scripts. No more warnings. I think that line should be added to the FAQ as well (Step 5 - last resort?). Cheers! Paul. On 03/05/06, Bret Pettichord wrote: > > Paul, > > Thanks for sharing your story. It's a good example for why it is really > hard to include solutions in error messages. > > I did not realize that these warnings were bothering you. It is easy to > suppress them. > > Watir uses a Logger object to do the logging. By default, it set to warn, > and this is a warn message. You could provide your own, customized logger to > Watir or change the settings on the default one in play. > > Something like > ie.logger.level = Logger::ERROR > might work. > > For details, see http://www.ruby-doc.org/stdlib/libdoc/logger/rdoc/index.html > > > Let us know what works for you and we'll add it to the FAQ. > > Bret > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/82973396/attachment.html From zeljko.filipin at gmail.com Wed May 3 11:43:38 2006 From: zeljko.filipin at gmail.com (Zeljko Filipin) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:43:38 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-general] Access Denied with Frames In-Reply-To: <37c405480605030828r23d827e9pa2b8f57ee3bf57c4@mail.gmail.com> References: <00c801c66e10$255b4b70$6601a8c0@Koko> <37c405480605021248j3c46290etc1934a6249b8d497@mail.gmail.com> <37c405480605030828r23d827e9pa2b8f57ee3bf57c4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Try to add it yourself (and put those tears of joy in another pair of eyes) :) On 5/3/06, Paul Carvalho wrote: > > Hooo-rahh! You can't see it, but there are tears of joy in my eyes! > > Thank you! That line works perfectly in my scripts. No more warnings. I > think that line should be added to the FAQ as well (Step 5 - last resort?). > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/aaab8c55/attachment.html From charley.baker at gmail.com Wed May 3 14:18:40 2006 From: charley.baker at gmail.com (Charley Baker) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:18:40 -0600 Subject: [Wtr-general] [War-general] Ruby IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I use Eclipse with the RDT Ruby plugin: http://rubyeclipse.sourceforge.net/ I use Eclipse for other languages, have a lot of plugins which make my life simpler and of course it's all free. :) The RDT plugin has support for integrated debugging, code completion, code formatting, syntax coloring, Test::Unit integration, runs IRB as an external tool and all the usual things that come with a decent ide plus with the Subclipse plugin, I get subversion integration. -Charley On 5/3/06, Pierre Garigue wrote: > > about debugging > > - PP is your friend. Every time I need to print debug info from inside a > program, I use pp rather than puts. I use pretty large data structure and > without pp I would be lost. > > I found this on using Breakpoint > http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoDebugWithBreakpoint . It's > from > using it in a Rails context but it may be useful > > > cheers > Pierre > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Wood [mailto:jeff.darklight at gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:08 AM > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE > > > There have only been a few times where having a graphical way to dig > through a data structure helped any more than simply using Emacs & > breakpoint. > > --jw. > > On 5/3/06, Cain, Mark wrote: > > > > > > > > Komodo is a pretty good IDE and has a good debugger but the personal > version > > cost 30 buck?I have also had some performance problems with this IDE > with > > Watir version 1.5.x. If you want free, try Eclipse with the RDE and the > SVN > > plug-ins. Eclipse is the one I end up using the most. > > > > > > > > > > > > --Mark > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > > Paul Carvalho > > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:47 AM > > > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been using SciTE. Until now I haven't heard of Arachno Ruby.. > maybe > > I'll check it out. > > > > Every time I try FreeRIDE it always disappoints me. I tried it again > just > > now - it doesn't like my dual monitor setup (does weird things with the > > menus), and it hangs for some reason in the middle of my scripts. The > > scripts run perfectly when I run them from a command line or SciTE, so I > > blame the hack'ish IDE. > > > > A good debugger would certainly be useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 03/05/06, Adrian Rutter wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir > tests. > > I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby > 1.8.3. > > > > Cheers > > > > Aidy > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060503/ead70dc1/attachment.html From christopher.mcmahon at gmail.com Wed May 3 14:44:55 2006 From: christopher.mcmahon at gmail.com (Chris McMahon) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:44:55 -0700 Subject: [Wtr-general] anyone ever hacked Watir to do Basic Authentication? Message-ID: <72799cd70605031144m22d4ba7fqff5d3aa05ef18a21@mail.gmail.com> So using net/http, I can do: my_id = 'user' my_pwd = 'password' auth = "Basic " + Base64.encode64( "#{my_id}:#{my_pwd}" ) url = '/' site = 'server' port = 80 req = Net::HTTP.new( site, port ) req.get( url, 'Authorization' => auth ) do |r| puts r end Has anyone ever considered having Watir do my_id = 'user' my_pwd = 'password' auth = "Basic " + Base64.encode64( "#{my_id}:#{my_pwd}" ) ie = IE.new ie.goto("http://server").auth It seems like it ought to be possible, and it'd save 99% of the WinClicker ugliness. -Chris From christopher.mcmahon at gmail.com Wed May 3 16:01:05 2006 From: christopher.mcmahon at gmail.com (Chris McMahon) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:01:05 -0700 Subject: [Wtr-general] hacked goto() almost working, any ideas? Re: anyone ever hacked Watir to do Basic Authentication? Message-ID: <72799cd70605031301x3d763eabh10af58ced3aa88a2@mail.gmail.com> Check this out, I've hacked watir's goto() method: def goto(url) #@ie.navigate(url) @ie.navigate(url,nil,nil,nil,"Authorization: Basic AbdXyz46bG1ubw==\n") wait() sleep 0.2 return @down_load_time end and it works!! The only problem is that it works only for the very first transaction. I'm now getting auth popups for inline images and things. Under normal circumstances, the browser, having passed basic authentication credentials once to this site would know to always pass those credentials to that site for every subsequent GET/POST/whatever. Anyone have any ideas about how to make that happen through hacking on Watir directly? -Chris On 5/3/06, Chris McMahon wrote: > So using net/http, I can do: > > my_id = 'user' > my_pwd = 'password' > auth = "Basic " + Base64.encode64( "#{my_id}:#{my_pwd}" ) > > url = '/' > site = 'server' > port = 80 > > req = Net::HTTP.new( site, port ) > req.get( url, 'Authorization' => auth ) do |r| > puts r > end > > Has anyone ever considered having Watir do > > my_id = 'user' > my_pwd = 'password' > auth = "Basic " + Base64.encode64( "#{my_id}:#{my_pwd}" ) > > ie = IE.new > ie.goto("http://server").auth > > It seems like it ought to be possible, and it'd save 99% of the > WinClicker ugliness. > > -Chris > From christopher.mcmahon at gmail.com Wed May 3 18:24:26 2006 From: christopher.mcmahon at gmail.com (Chris McMahon) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 15:24:26 -0700 Subject: [Wtr-general] hacked goto() almost working, any ideas? Re: anyone ever hacked Watir to do Basic Authentication? In-Reply-To: <72799cd70605031301x3d763eabh10af58ced3aa88a2@mail.gmail.com> References: <72799cd70605031301x3d763eabh10af58ced3aa88a2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <72799cd70605031524y157a4b21sd4d5a82d20b4dcfc@mail.gmail.com> Finally, seems like my problem is just for frames. In fact, it seems exactly like this problem: http://www.talkaboutsoftware.com/group/microsoft.public.inetsdk.programming.webbrowser_ctl/messages/17461.html I've also tried navigating directly to the frame in question first, then to the main page, but it doesn't help, the browser still won't use auth credentials to request the frame. On 5/3/06, Chris McMahon wrote: > Check this out, I've hacked watir's goto() method: > > def goto(url) > #@ie.navigate(url) > @ie.navigate(url,nil,nil,nil,"Authorization: Basic > AbdXyz46bG1ubw==\n") > wait() > sleep 0.2 > return @down_load_time > end > > and it works!! > > The only problem is that it works only for the very first transaction. > I'm now getting auth popups for inline images and things. > > Under normal circumstances, the browser, having passed basic > authentication credentials once to this site would know to always pass > those credentials to that site for every subsequent GET/POST/whatever. > Anyone have any ideas about how to make that happen through hacking > on Watir directly? > > -Chris > > > On 5/3/06, Chris McMahon wrote: > > So using net/http, I can do: > > > > my_id = 'user' > > my_pwd = 'password' > > auth = "Basic " + Base64.encode64( "#{my_id}:#{my_pwd}" ) > > > > url = '/' > > site = 'server' > > port = 80 > > > > req = Net::HTTP.new( site, port ) > > req.get( url, 'Authorization' => auth ) do |r| > > puts r > > end > > > > Has anyone ever considered having Watir do > > > > my_id = 'user' > > my_pwd = 'password' > > auth = "Basic " + Base64.encode64( "#{my_id}:#{my_pwd}" ) > > > > ie = IE.new > > ie.goto("http://server").auth > > > > It seems like it ought to be possible, and it'd save 99% of the > > WinClicker ugliness. > > > > -Chris > > > From r.chandan at gmail.com Thu May 4 01:16:41 2006 From: r.chandan at gmail.com (Chandan R) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:46:41 +0530 Subject: [Wtr-general] [War-general] Ruby IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9f72bbb40605032216p4ac0fc6as986ce876227ac3cf@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I have installed the ruby plugin for eclipse. But on clicking any of the options provided by this plugin in eclipse, i get a error message which says -- "An error has occured see error log for more details". Where can i find the error log? Has anyone faced similar problems? Eclipse version i am using - 3.0.0 Ruby Development Tools plugin version - 0.7.0.601192300PRD Thanks in advance, Chandan R On 5/3/06, Charley Baker wrote: > > I use Eclipse with the RDT Ruby plugin: > http://rubyeclipse.sourceforge.net/ I use Eclipse for other languages, > have a lot of plugins which make my life simpler and of course it's all > free. :) The RDT plugin has support for integrated debugging, code > completion, code formatting, syntax coloring, Test::Unit integration, runs > IRB as an external tool and all the usual things that come with a decent ide > plus with the Subclipse plugin, I get subversion integration. > > -Charley > > > On 5/3/06, Pierre Garigue wrote: > > > > about debugging > > > > - PP is your friend. Every time I need to print debug info from inside a > > program, I use pp rather than puts. I use pretty large data structure and > > without pp I would be lost. > > > > I found this on using Breakpoint > > http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoDebugWithBreakpoint . It's > > from > > using it in a Rails context but it may be useful > > > > > > cheers > > Pierre > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jeff Wood [mailto:jeff.darklight at gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:08 AM > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE > > > > > > There have only been a few times where having a graphical way to dig > > through a data structure helped any more than simply using Emacs & > > breakpoint. > > > > --jw. > > > > On 5/3/06, Cain, Mark wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Komodo is a pretty good IDE and has a good debugger but the personal > > version > > > cost 30 buck?I have also had some performance problems with this IDE > > with > > > Watir version 1.5.x. If you want free, try Eclipse with the RDE and > > the SVN > > > plug-ins. Eclipse is the one I end up using the most. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > > > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > > > Paul Carvalho > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:47 AM > > > > > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been using SciTE. Until now I haven't heard of Arachno Ruby.. > > maybe > > > I'll check it out. > > > > > > Every time I try FreeRIDE it always disappoints me. I tried it again > > just > > > now - it doesn't like my dual monitor setup (does weird things with > > the > > > menus), and it hangs for some reason in the middle of my scripts. The > > > > > scripts run perfectly when I run them from a command line or SciTE, so > > I > > > blame the hack'ish IDE. > > > > > > A good debugger would certainly be useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 03/05/06, Adrian Rutter < Adrian.Rutter at tnt.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir > > tests. > > > I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby > > 1.8.3. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Aidy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wtr-general mailing list > > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > -- Chandan R http://chandanr.blogspot.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wtr-general/attachments/20060504/f2212301/attachment.html From jeff.darklight at gmail.com Thu May 4 01:59:32 2006 From: jeff.darklight at gmail.com (Jeff Wood) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 22:59:32 -0700 Subject: [Wtr-general] [War-general] Ruby IDE In-Reply-To: <9f72bbb40605032216p4ac0fc6as986ce876227ac3cf@mail.gmail.com> References: <9f72bbb40605032216p4ac0fc6as986ce876227ac3cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I believe that version 0.7 of the RDT is intended for a newer version of Eclipse. --jw. On 5/3/06, Chandan R wrote: > Hi, > I have installed the ruby plugin for eclipse. But on clicking any of the > options provided by this plugin in eclipse, i get a error message which says > -- "An error has occured see error log for more details". Where can i find > the error log? Has anyone faced similar problems? > > Eclipse version i am using - 3.0.0 > Ruby Development Tools plugin version - 0.7.0.601192300PRD > > Thanks in advance, > Chandan R > > > On 5/3/06, Charley Baker wrote: > > > > I use Eclipse with the RDT Ruby plugin: > http://rubyeclipse.sourceforge.net/ I use Eclipse for > other languages, have a lot of plugins which make my life simpler and of > course it's all free. :) The RDT plugin has support for integrated > debugging, code completion, code formatting, syntax coloring, Test::Unit > integration, runs IRB as an external tool and all the usual things that come > with a decent ide plus with the Subclipse plugin, I get subversion > integration. > > > > > > -Charley > > > > > > > > On 5/3/06, Pierre Garigue wrote: > > > about debugging > > > > > > - PP is your friend. Every time I need to print debug info from inside a > program, I use pp rather than puts. I use pretty large data structure and > without pp I would be lost. > > > > > > I found this on using Breakpoint > http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoDebugWithBreakpoint > . It's from > > > using it in a Rails context but it may be useful > > > > > > > > > cheers > > > Pierre > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jeff Wood [mailto:jeff.darklight at gmail.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:08 AM > > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE > > > > > > > > > There have only been a few times where having a graphical way to dig > > > through a data structure helped any more than simply using Emacs & > > > breakpoint. > > > > > > --jw. > > > > > > On 5/3/06, Cain, Mark wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Komodo is a pretty good IDE and has a good debugger but the personal > version > > > > cost 30 buck?I have also had some performance problems with this IDE > with > > > > Watir version 1.5.x. If you want free, try Eclipse with the RDE and > the SVN > > > > plug-ins. Eclipse is the one I end up using the most. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > From: wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > > > > [mailto:wtr-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf > Of > > > > Paul Carvalho > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:47 AM > > > > > > > > To: wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Ruby IDE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been using SciTE. Until now I haven't heard of Arachno Ruby.. > maybe > > > > I'll check it out. > > > > > > > > Every time I try FreeRIDE it always disappoints me. I tried it again > just > > > > now - it doesn't like my dual monitor setup (does weird things with > the > > > > menus), and it hangs for some reason in the middle of my scripts. The > > > > scripts run perfectly when I run them from a command line or SciTE, so > I > > > > blame the hack'ish IDE. > > > > > > > > A good debugger would certainly be useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 03/05/06, Adrian Rutter < Adrian.Rutter at tnt.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I would like to find out what Ruby IDE you are using for your Watir > tests. > > > > I downloaded Arachno Ruby, but its debugger only supports upto Ruby > 1.8.3. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Aidy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Wtr-general mailing list > > > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wtr-general mailing list > > > Wtr-general at rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wtr-general mailing list