[Wtr-development] Version Naming

Charley Baker charley.baker at gmail.com
Sun Oct 24 17:39:33 EDT 2010


Agreed. Some of the current deletions are a bit debatable, and the
semantic versioning has gotten a bit lost. As a basic primer, I'd
suggest we start following these rules: http://semver.org/


Charley Baker
Lead Developer, Watir, http://watir.com



On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Bret Pettichord <bret at pettichord.com> wrote:
> I know there is a strong desire to make a release that drops support for
> several obsolete features.
>
> Makes sense, but if we do that we should call the release 1.7.0 rather than
> 1.6.x. It would also be great if the prior 1.6.x release included warnings
> for the deprecated features.
>
> Bret
>
> --
> Bret Pettichord
> Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com
>
> Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog
> Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wtr-development mailing list
> Wtr-development at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
>


More information about the Wtr-development mailing list