[Win32utils-devel] A universal "windows" platform for Rubygems

Daniel Berger djberg96 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 19 15:31:47 UTC 2013

I've forked rubygems, though I haven't started working on it again yet.
I've added you as a collaborator. I'll add anyone else lurking on the list
who is interested.

There are actually two things I want to do.

First, is the "windows" platform. Luis' concerns were for binary gems where
the lack of a specific toolchain platform might be an issue. One thing we
could do is issue a warning and/or fail if the
Gem::Specification#extensions attribute is set.

Second is changing the default cpu to "universal". Having gem installs fail
because of "x86" vs "x86-64" is annoying, and I don't know of a single
non-binary gem that depends on it. Again, we could check the "extensions"
attribute if necessary.



On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Heesob Park <phasis at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 2013/4/19 Daniel Berger <djberg96 at gmail.com>:
> > I think it's time I brought this up again. Unfortunately, my original
> pull
> > request is lost, but I think you get the gist of it:
> >
> > https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/93
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> I think the rubygems should be more concerned with Windows platform.
> I hope that Luis Lavena do not disagree with you at this time.
> Regards,
> Park Heesob
> _______________________________________________
> win32utils-devel mailing list
> win32utils-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/win32utils-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/win32utils-devel/attachments/20130419/feaba735/attachment.html>

More information about the win32utils-devel mailing list