[Win32utils-devel] The dreaded licensing question
djberg96 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 17 12:19:36 EDT 2009
So far I have put all of the Win32Utils code (and all of my OSS Ruby stuff,
really) under "Ruby's" license. Ruby's license is a modified version of the
LGPL. I was thinking of switching to Artistic 2.0, which is still "GPL
I like it because it's short and relatively easy to read.
And it held up in US court:
What do you think? Does anyone object to switching to Artistic 2.0?
More information about the win32utils-devel