From djberg96 at gmail.com  Sat Sep  2 10:05:18 2006
From: djberg96 at gmail.com (Daniel Berger)
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 08:05:18 -0600
Subject: [Win32utils-devel] Dir.readlink
Message-ID: <44F98F9E.5010403@gmail.com>

Hi all,

I was thinking we should have a Dir.readlink method that would follow a 
junction to its destination.  Sound good?  Is 'readlink' a good choice? 
Or should we call it read_junction?

Regards,

Dan

From noreply at rubyforge.org  Fri Sep 22 11:42:03 2006
From: noreply at rubyforge.org (noreply at rubyforge.org)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:42:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [Win32utils-devel] [ win32utils-Feature Requests-5855 ] gems for
	every package
Message-ID: <20060922154203.66C9D5240E60@rubyforge.org>

Feature Requests item #5855, was opened at 2006-09-22 15:42
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=5855&group_id=85

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Ivan Muzzolini (imuzzolini)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gems for every package

Initial Comment:
Why not having a gem for every package?


Thanks!

Bye!
Ivan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=5855&group_id=85

From noreply at rubyforge.org  Sat Sep 23 18:35:49 2006
From: noreply at rubyforge.org (noreply at rubyforge.org)
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:35:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [Win32utils-devel] [ win32utils-Feature Requests-5855 ] gems for
	every package
Message-ID: <20060923223549.9624A524135A@rubyforge.org>

Feature Requests item #5855, was opened at 2006-09-22 08:42
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=5855&group_id=85

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Ivan Muzzolini (imuzzolini)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gems for every package

Initial Comment:
Why not having a gem for every package?


Thanks!

Bye!
Ivan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Daniel Berger (djberg96)
Date: 2006-09-23 15:35

Message:
We're working on it!

The C extensions are proving to be a pain.  I'm not sure if it's a bug in gems or what, because building and installing gems locally works fine, but when I pull them remotely they fail.  That's why you've only seen gems for the pure Ruby stuff so far.

Thanks,

Dan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=5855&group_id=85