[Win32utils-devel] Tweak to win32-eventlog

Wayne Vucenic waynev at gmail.com
Wed Dec 20 23:20:24 EST 2006


Sounds good.  Have a great time in Florida!

See you next year,

Wayne

On 12/20/06, Daniel Berger <djberg96 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Wayne Vucenic wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> >> I should have release 0.4.3 out today.
> >
> > I tried the 0.4.3 gem on my XP system that was having the problem before:
> >
> > C:\ruby\lib\ruby\gems\1.8\gems\win32-eventlog-0.4.3\test>ruby tc_eventlog.rb
> >
> > Relax - this will take a few moments
> >
> > Loaded suite tc_eventlog
> > Started
> > ...................FF....F
> > Finished in 317.016 seconds.
> >
> >   1) Failure:
> > test_seek_read(TC_EventLog) [tc_eventlog.rb:116]:
> > <11> expected but was
> > <0>.
> >
> >   2) Failure:
> > test_seek_read_backwards(TC_EventLog) [tc_eventlog.rb:123]:
> > <10> expected but was
> > <0>.
> >
> >   3) Failure:
> > test_version(TC_EventLog) [tc_eventlog.rb:29]:
> > <"0.4.2"> expected but was
> > <"0.4.3">.
> >
> > 26 tests, 5206 assertions, 3 failures, 0 errors
> >
> > It looks like something didn't get updated for 0.4.3.  I notice that
> > the tc_eventlog.rb
> > file is identical between 0.4.2 and 0.4.3.
> >
> > I then tried it on my Win2K system that used to work, and I get:
> >
> > C:\ruby\lib\ruby\gems\1.8\gems\win32-eventlog-0.4.3\test>ruby tc_eventlog.rb
> >
> > Relax - this will take a few moments
> >
> > Loaded suite tc_eventlog
> > Started
> > ...................FF....F
> > Finished in 0.609 seconds.
> >
> >   1) Failure:
> > test_seek_read(TC_EventLog) [tc_eventlog.rb:116]:
> > <11> expected but was
> > <0>.
> >
> >   2) Failure:
> > test_seek_read_backwards(TC_EventLog) [tc_eventlog.rb:123]:
> > <10> expected but was
> > <0>.
> >
> >   3) Failure:
> > test_version(TC_EventLog) [tc_eventlog.rb:29]:
> > <"0.4.2"> expected but was
> > <"0.4.3">.
> >
> > 26 tests, 82 assertions, 3 failures, 0 errors
> >
> > It's odd that I'm now seeing the two failures on this system, as I didn't
> > see them before.
>
> Yeah, I forgot to update the test file.  I wouldn't worry about the
> failures.  They're likely failing for the same reason.
>
> I'm off to Florida tomorrow, so this will have to wait until next year.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> win32utils-devel mailing list
> win32utils-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/win32utils-devel
>


More information about the win32utils-devel mailing list