[Vit-discuss] Ruby compared to other languages...

James Edward Gray II james at grayproductions.net
Wed Sep 13 08:52:51 EDT 2006


On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:00 PM, James Britt wrote:

> Matt Todd wrote:
>
>>
>>> 2) Let's celebrate Ruby. Poking fun at other languages' syntax  
>>> just gets
>>> down in the mud.
>>
>>
>> Actually, I meant no fun by it, but a real-world comparison of how
>> Ruby compares to others. For instance, in the previous example, you
>> see how Ruby treats things as objects, but PHP decidedly does not.
>
> Yeah, but these things always end poorly, and no one comes out looking
> good, no matter the intentions.

I agree, it feels like mud slinging to me.  I know that's not  
intended, but I believe it's best avoided for that reason.

James Edward Gray II


More information about the vit-discuss mailing list