[Vit-discuss] Redesign 2005 Blog
james.britt at gmail.com
Fri Mar 11 09:53:52 EST 2005
why the lucky stiff wrote:
> We're still working on this site a bit, so keep it on the down low for
> now-- a.k.a. sshhh--
I much prefer Michael's "Clean" 1.0 . It's, well, *cleaner*, crisp,
more modern; the header wastes less space, logo is not the routine,
semi-realistic Ruby gem. The Clean logo scales well, and lends itself
better to T-shirts, business cards, and other re-use.
The information on the page is also more focused on practical usage.
For example, there is no need to publish recent blog headlines; better
to have a link to a list of blogs and use the saved space more
effectively (as Michael has done).
Overall, the Clean design does more with a better use of space. Like
(On a side note, I can see possible problems with encouraging discussion
here, and on ruby-talk, and as well as in blog comments. There are
likely to be duplicate discussions, with people missing good points
unless they are actively following all sources.)
More information about the vit-discuss