[Vit-discuss] I'm getting the manager!
bg-rubytalk at infofiend.com
Thu Feb 24 13:02:27 EST 2005
Todd Grimason wrote:
> I think the point raised by David HH from Rails to someone here about
> "design by committee" has made its first appearance already. Whomever
> is running this show should probably just make the call or this is
> likely to continue indefinitely, ad nauseum, and people will get
> frustrated and leave.
> Over a year ago I tried to help out with a similar project for python,
> and this exact situation brought it down in flames. Everyone spent
> lots of time and effort, all for naught since there was no "manager"
> and eventually Guido actually stepped in and shut down the effort. I
> think we should try to avoid a similar outcome (though matz sounds a
> bit more carefree [in a good way]!)
Only a couple of problems, we don't really have any managers (yet) and
this was labelled a "brainstorming" topic, so it's not too bad that it
would get out of hand.
Meanwhile, people like Hugh Sasse are still contributing useful comments
to the other threads (accessibility, etc).
I think we can abandon this discussion for the moment, although
eventually a decision will need to be made about what gets hosted on
ruby-lang.org, and what gets pointed to instead. I don't think the two
sides are all that far apart. If I read things correctly, James Britt
says he thinks the core API docs should be hosted on ruby-lang.org as
well, so it's really just a matter of where do we draw the line. Since
that's something that may be dictated by the final look of the site,
then it probably makes sense to wait.
More information about the vit-discuss