[Vit-discuss] content refreshness or lack of [was Brainstorming]
james.britt at gmail.com
Wed Feb 23 09:07:06 EST 2005
David A. Black wrote:
> I would be cautious about the centralization (physically) of
> resources, as well as about the notion of "official" resources.
> Physical centralization doesn't make sense for many things --
> especially advocacy material, which should be as far-flung as
> possible, but also documentation and tutorials. (I can't think of any
> reason to go to the trouble of moving the online Pickaxe, Why's
> Poignant Guide, Chris Pine's "Programming through Ruby" site, etc., to
> a single server; it would just be busy-work).
> Similarly, things that are not on the ruby-lang.org server must not be
> cast in the role of second-rate or unimportant. This is where the
> notion of "official" materials can be counter-productive. The
> official site should point with pride and joy to the great things that
> have been done, and continue to be done, around the net on behalf of
> Ruby. The community has already outgrown -- or simply not bothered
> with -- a strict official/non-official division, particularly along
> server lines.
> In short, I'd describe it not as "the official site for Ruby
> resources", but as "the Ruby homepage, which includes some resources"
> -- leaving it open-ended.
More information about the vit-discuss