Worth supporting 1.9 conditionally?
dougkearns at gmail.com
Wed Sep 1 14:12:51 EDT 2010
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
> I'm also curious what's missing. I know there are issues when 1.9 style
> symbol hash keys are reserved words (had to revert my own fix for that due
> to side effects).
Nothing interesting. I just noticed some of the predefined constants/variables
were missing. E.g. RUBY_ENGINE, __ENCODING__, __callee__ etc.
> Perhaps -> should be highlighted (but what group?).
I just stuck it in rubyOperators for those fond of rainbows. I don't really
think it needs highlighting otherwise. "->" and "lambda" are roughly analogous
to "||" and "or".
> Those are the only omissions I've noticed, speaking as someone who's spent
> the last month working in 1.9.
Longer than myself then. :)
More information about the vim-ruby-devel