From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Fri Apr 20 14:29:10 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:29:10 -0500
Subject: eRuby revisited
Message-ID: <20070420182910.GV5710@tpope.us>

After much thought, I've finally implemented the changes necessary to
allow eRuby to be mixed with arbitrary filetypes.  The syntax file,
indent plugin, and ftplugin all integrate their own settings with
settings from the ruby filetype and other filetype.  The system works
surprisingly well, so I have decided to hold off on a separate "rhtml"
filetype.  The ftdetect file has also been updated to recognize a .erb
extension.

The other filetype (hereafter referred to as the subtype) is detected
based on the current filename.  The algorithm used is to look at the
extension of the file, after stripping off an optional ".erb".  For
"foo.html.erb", the subtype would be html.  A few extensions are
mapped to other filetypes (rhtml to html for instance), but by and
large this extension is used as is.  If no extension is present after
removing ".erb", the default is html.

It would of course be nice to hook the remaining filename into the
much smarter filetype detection system provided by Vim but this
doesn't appear feasible.  For more unusual contructs like
"foo.pl.erb", the nonexistant "pl" filetype will be used.  This can be
overridden by the user if so desired:

  autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead *.pl.erb let b:eruby_subtype='perl'|set ft=eruby

Unfortunately, the resetting of the filetype is necessary unless this
autocmd is defined before filetype detection is enabled.

One final note about the filetype determination.  The detection
algorithm is duplicated in both the syntax file and ftplugin.  This
means two places to update, but the ftplugin needs it because it runs
first, and the syntax file needs it because of the (typically
uninformed) users who have enabled syntax highlighting but not
filetype plugins.  I didn't bother duplicating it in the indent plugin
because it runs fast, and I figure most users enable at least one of
the two others.

Other than documentation, and perhaps a way to override the global
default subtype, I consider the transition to the new system largely
complete.  Please let me know of any issues.

Doug, my understanding is you don't do a lot with eRuby anyways, so I
have listed myself as the maintainer of the other two eRuby files.
Feel free to claim them back if you feel I'm encroaching on your turf.

Cheers,
Tim

From patrick.schless at gmail.com  Sun Apr 22 09:29:26 2007
From: patrick.schless at gmail.com (Patrick Schless)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:29:26 -0500
Subject: indenting issue
Message-ID: <4b5d0b760704220629v5e852aefx5b41a23a6e84e0c4@mail.gmail.com>

I am getting incorrect indenting under a very specific condition.  In
a case statement, if the 'when' is testing against a string, and the
next line starts a 'do' block, the contents of the 'do' block do not
get indented.

The error occurs for both the 'loop do' and 'do |foo|' forms.

a = "b"

case a
when "a"
  loop do
  # indenting is now off by one
  end
# Still off
end
# back to normal

case a
when "a"

  loop do
  # off by one even if there is an empty line above the 'do'
  end
end

case a
when "a"
  puts a
  loop do
    # Indenting is ok if there is at least one non-empty,
non-commented line above it
  end
end

From dougkearns at gmail.com  Wed Apr 25 11:04:43 2007
From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns)
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:04:43 +1000
Subject: eRuby revisited
In-Reply-To: <20070420182910.GV5710@tpope.us>
References: <20070420182910.GV5710@tpope.us>
Message-ID: <644fc65e0704250804g32e70eecvcc386de318975ed@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/21/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
> After much thought, I've finally implemented the changes necessary to
> allow eRuby to be mixed with arbitrary filetypes.  The syntax file,
> indent plugin, and ftplugin all integrate their own settings with
> settings from the ruby filetype and other filetype.  The system works
> surprisingly well, so I have decided to hold off on a separate "rhtml"
> filetype.

A rare victory for purity over practicality? ;-)

<snip>

> Doug, my understanding is you don't do a lot with eRuby anyways, so I
> have listed myself as the maintainer of the other two eRuby files.
> Feel free to claim them back if you feel I'm encroaching on your turf.

All yours mate! Thanks.

Regards,
Doug

From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Sun May  6 13:01:19 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:01:19 -0500
Subject: Imminent Vim 7.1 release, can we make it?
Message-ID: <20070506170119.GG18708@tpope.us>

Hi all.

The first beta of Vim 7.1 is out, and apparently Bram intends on doing
the release in the next few days.  Doug, any chance of us doing a
release in the next 24 hours or so, in time to make it into the next
Vim release?  I'm going to start working on the NEWS file now.  Let me
know if you need any additional help; I'd really like to get the new
eRuby stuff into 7.1.  If/when you email Bram, don't forget to let him
know to add *.erb to the ftdetect script.

Let me take this moment to justify a couple of recent changes I made.
The ruby ftplugin now sports 8 new maps: [[, ]], [], ][, [m, ]m, [M,
and ]M.  The first 4 bounce around class and module declarations, and
the second four around method declarations.  My rationale for their
inclusion is that they cover up sequences that are quite worthless in
Ruby with mappings that mirror their original intent.  This is not
unprecedented:  Bram himself does it in ftplugin/vim.vim.  I'm
generally against mappings in ftplugins but I think these are both
helpful and benign.

If anyone disagrees, by all means strip them out until we can discuss
them more.  I don't want them to hold up the release.

Cheers,
Tim

From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Sun May  6 13:57:00 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:57:00 -0500
Subject: Imminent Vim 7.1 release, can we make it?
In-Reply-To: <20070506170119.GG18708@tpope.us>
References: <20070506170119.GG18708@tpope.us>
Message-ID: <20070506175700.GH18708@tpope.us>

On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:01:19PM -0500, Tim Pope wrote:
> The first beta of Vim 7.1 is out, and apparently Bram intends on doing
> the release in the next few days.  Doug, any chance of us doing a
> release in the next 24 hours or so, in time to make it into the next
> Vim release?  I'm going to start working on the NEWS file now.  Let me

NEWS is done.

Cheers,
Tim

From dougkearns at gmail.com  Sun May  6 21:42:00 2007
From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 11:42:00 +1000
Subject: Imminent Vim 7.1 release, can we make it?
In-Reply-To: <20070506170119.GG18708@tpope.us>
References: <20070506170119.GG18708@tpope.us>
Message-ID: <644fc65e0705061842h7b678f93x44598fa5d5fb7cd3@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/7/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> The first beta of Vim 7.1 is out, and apparently Bram intends on doing
> the release in the next few days.

Bram and his two day betas, eh? ;-)

> Doug, any chance of us doing a
> release in the next 24 hours or so, in time to make it into the next
> Vim release?  I'm going to start working on the NEWS file now.  Let me
> know if you need any additional help; I'd really like to get the new
> eRuby stuff into 7.1.  If/when you email Bram, don't forget to let him
> know to add *.erb to the ftdetect script.

That should be fine. Have you been running from CVS since the last release?

> Let me take this moment to justify a couple of recent changes I made.
> The ruby ftplugin now sports 8 new maps: [[, ]], [], ][, [m, ]m, [M,
> and ]M.  The first 4 bounce around class and module declarations, and
> the second four around method declarations.  My rationale for their
> inclusion is that they cover up sequences that are quite worthless in
> Ruby with mappings that mirror their original intent.  This is not
> unprecedented:  Bram himself does it in ftplugin/vim.vim.  I'm
> generally against mappings in ftplugins but I think these are both
> helpful and benign.
>
> If anyone disagrees, by all means strip them out until we can discuss
> them more.  I don't want them to hold up the release.

Sounds good - I have no objections.  Gavin?

Regards,
Doug

From dougkearns at gmail.com  Sun May  6 21:58:42 2007
From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 11:58:42 +1000
Subject: Imminent Vim 7.1 release, can we make it?
In-Reply-To: <20070506175700.GH18708@tpope.us>
References: <20070506170119.GG18708@tpope.us> <20070506175700.GH18708@tpope.us>
Message-ID: <644fc65e0705061858w1997e507ra144ea1a011323b5@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/7/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:01:19PM -0500, Tim Pope wrote:
> > The first beta of Vim 7.1 is out, and apparently Bram intends on doing
> > the release in the next few days.  Doug, any chance of us doing a
> > release in the next 24 hours or so, in time to make it into the next
> > Vim release?  I'm going to start working on the NEWS file now.  Let me
>
> NEWS is done.

Thanks!

Regards,
Doug

From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Sun May  6 22:17:35 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 21:17:35 -0500
Subject: Imminent Vim 7.1 release, can we make it?
In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0705061842h7b678f93x44598fa5d5fb7cd3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20070506170119.GG18708@tpope.us>
	<644fc65e0705061842h7b678f93x44598fa5d5fb7cd3@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070507021735.GK18708@tpope.us>

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:42:00AM +1000, Doug Kearns wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > The first beta of Vim 7.1 is out, and apparently Bram intends on doing
> > the release in the next few days.
> 
> Bram and his two day betas, eh? ;-)

Yeah, I know.  It's mostly a humdrum incremental release, so he's not
anticipating many problems.

> > Doug, any chance of us doing a
> > release in the next 24 hours or so, in time to make it into the next
> > Vim release?  I'm going to start working on the NEWS file now.  Let me
> > know if you need any additional help; I'd really like to get the new
> > eRuby stuff into 7.1.  If/when you email Bram, don't forget to let him
> > know to add *.erb to the ftdetect script.
> 
> That should be fine. Have you been running from CVS since the last release?

Yes, and tweaking it here and there.

There is also documentation that needs to be updated (the syntax one).
In addition to *.erb, there are a couple of other extensions I've
added to ftdetect as well.  I'm linking a patch (over the list size
limit) against the latest Vim CVS that you can send to Bram if you
want.  It might make things easier for him.

http://rails.vim.tpope.net/vim-ruby.patch

Cheers,
Tim

From dougkearns at gmail.com  Mon May  7 01:02:37 2007
From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:02:37 +1000
Subject: Imminent Vim 7.1 release, can we make it?
In-Reply-To: <20070507021735.GK18708@tpope.us>
References: <20070506170119.GG18708@tpope.us>
	<644fc65e0705061842h7b678f93x44598fa5d5fb7cd3@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070507021735.GK18708@tpope.us>
Message-ID: <644fc65e0705062202v462cb839j3a0b42a592ae7fb0@mail.gmail.com>

Tim,

On 5/7/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:42:00AM +1000, Doug Kearns wrote:
> > On 5/7/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > The first beta of Vim 7.1 is out, and apparently Bram intends on doing
> > > the release in the next few days.
> >
> > Bram and his two day betas, eh? ;-)
>
> Yeah, I know.  It's mostly a humdrum incremental release, so he's not
> anticipating many problems.

I've just sent the latest release to Bram.  I'll send it up to
rubyforge later today.

<snip>

Regards,
Doug

From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Mon May  7 01:26:05 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:26:05 -0500
Subject: Imminent Vim 7.1 release, can we make it?
In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0705062202v462cb839j3a0b42a592ae7fb0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20070506170119.GG18708@tpope.us>
	<644fc65e0705061842h7b678f93x44598fa5d5fb7cd3@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070507021735.GK18708@tpope.us>
	<644fc65e0705062202v462cb839j3a0b42a592ae7fb0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070507052605.GL18708@tpope.us>

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:02:37PM +1000, Doug Kearns wrote:
> I've just sent the latest release to Bram.  I'll send it up to
> rubyforge later today.

Great, thanks a lot.

Cheers,
Tim

From dougkearns at gmail.com  Mon May  7 11:06:55 2007
From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns)
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 01:06:55 +1000
Subject: 2007.05.07 released
Message-ID: <644fc65e0705070806seb1340fg4559bc9aef32f063@mail.gmail.com>

Hello all,

I've sent up vim-ruby-2007.05.07 to RubyForge.

Regards,
Doug

From ryanshillington at gmail.com  Wed May  9 23:58:25 2007
From: ryanshillington at gmail.com (Ryan Shillington)
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 22:58:25 -0500
Subject: I can't indent html at all.
Message-ID: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>

Hey guys,

I had previously installed all kinds of rails plugins (probably a mismash of
things contributed to this project in their earlier days), so I uninstalled
Vim altogether, did a clean re-install of Vim 7.0 on Windows and installed
this vim-ruby stuff (version 2007.05.07) using the gem.

Now, whenever I select code that looks like the following:

<% if(@show_confirmation)%>
  <div id="confirmationHeaderDiv">
    <table style="width: 100%;">
      <tr>
        <td><img src="/images/leftYellowTab.gif" width="11"
height="13"></td>
        <td class="yellowBackground" style="width: 100%;"></td>
        <td><img src="/images/rightYellowTab.gif" width="11"
height="13"></td>
      </tr>
    </table>
    <div id="confirmationHeaderImageDiv"><%=image_tag("checkout/step5.gif",
:align =>"center", :border=> 0, :width => 451, :height => 71) %></div>
  </div>
<%end%>


and press "=" which used to indent the HTML for me, I now see:

<% if(@show_confirmation)%>
  <div id="confirmationHeaderDiv">
  <table style="width: 100%;">
  <tr>
  <td><img src="/images/leftYellowTab.gif" width="11" height="13"></td>
  <td class="yellowBackground" style="width: 100%;"></td>
  <td><img src="/images/rightYellowTab.gif" width="11" height="13"></td>
  </tr>
  </table>
  <div id="confirmationHeaderImageDiv"><%=image_tag("checkout/step5.gif",
:align =>"center", :border=> 0, :width => 451, :height => 71) %></div>
  </div>
<%end%>

Ah!!! It's destroyed my html formating.  The filename is called
show.rhtmland I checked that the filetype is being recognized as
eruby.  My _vimrc is
available here (http://www.thebookhauler.com/vimRuby/_vimrc) although I
tried it without my _vimrc and got the same results.

Any ideas what I might be doing wrong?  That used to work.

Thanks in advance,

Ryan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/vim-ruby-devel/attachments/20070509/4f783687/attachment-0001.html 

From dougkearns at gmail.com  Thu May 10 00:32:53 2007
From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:32:53 +1000
Subject: I can't indent html at all.
In-Reply-To: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>
References: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <644fc65e0705092132sdb59cd6i412678370a1f9ebe@mail.gmail.com>

G'day Ryan,

On 5/10/07, Ryan Shillington <ryanshillington at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I had previously installed all kinds of rails plugins (probably a mismash of
> things contributed to this project in their earlier days), so I uninstalled
> Vim altogether, did a clean re-install of Vim 7.0 on Windows and installed
> this vim-ruby stuff (version 2007.05.07) using the gem.
>
> Now, whenever I select code that looks like the following:

<snip>

> Ah!!! It's destroyed my html formating.  The filename is called show.rhtml
> and I checked that the filetype is being recognized as eruby.  My _vimrc is
> available here (
> http://www.thebookhauler.com/vimRuby/_vimrc) although I
> tried it without my _vimrc and got the same results.
>
> Any ideas what I might be doing wrong?  That used to work.

FWIW, this works for me on a Windows box....

Your results seem to me to be consistent with the HTML indent file not
being sourced.  What does :let b:eruby_subtype return?  Is the Ruby
indented?

<%
  if true
    puts "indenting works here"
  end
%>

Thanks,
Doug

From ryanshillington at gmail.com  Thu May 10 11:11:05 2007
From: ryanshillington at gmail.com (Ryan Shillington)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:11:05 -0500
Subject: I can't indent html at all.
In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0705092132sdb59cd6i412678370a1f9ebe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>
	<644fc65e0705092132sdb59cd6i412678370a1f9ebe@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <154583e20705100811q7223c156n613eb40c1a747e57@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Doug,

Yup, the ruby is indented just fine.  The result of ":let b:eruby_subtype"
is "b:eruby_subtype       html".

Thanks for the quick reply - I appreciate it.

Ryan

On 5/9/07, Doug Kearns <dougkearns at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> G'day Ryan,
>
> On 5/10/07, Ryan Shillington <ryanshillington at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I had previously installed all kinds of rails plugins (probably a
> mismash of
> > things contributed to this project in their earlier days), so I
> uninstalled
> > Vim altogether, did a clean re-install of Vim 7.0 on Windows and
> installed
> > this vim-ruby stuff (version 2007.05.07) using the gem.
> >
> > Now, whenever I select code that looks like the following:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Ah!!! It's destroyed my html formating.  The filename is called
> show.rhtml
> > and I checked that the filetype is being recognized as eruby.  My _vimrc
> is
> > available here (
> > http://www.thebookhauler.com/vimRuby/_vimrc) although I
> > tried it without my _vimrc and got the same results.
> >
> > Any ideas what I might be doing wrong?  That used to work.
>
> FWIW, this works for me on a Windows box....
>
> Your results seem to me to be consistent with the HTML indent file not
> being sourced.  What does :let b:eruby_subtype return?  Is the Ruby
> indented?
>
> <%
>   if true
>     puts "indenting works here"
>   end
> %>
>
> Thanks,
> Doug
> _______________________________________________
> vim-ruby-devel mailing list
> vim-ruby-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/vim-ruby-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/vim-ruby-devel/attachments/20070510/a8e8dcc6/attachment.html 

From dougkearns at gmail.com  Thu May 10 11:45:54 2007
From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 01:45:54 +1000
Subject: I can't indent html at all.
In-Reply-To: <154583e20705100811q7223c156n613eb40c1a747e57@mail.gmail.com>
References: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>
	<644fc65e0705092132sdb59cd6i412678370a1f9ebe@mail.gmail.com>
	<154583e20705100811q7223c156n613eb40c1a747e57@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <644fc65e0705100845w1fd784e1taa0e2398d9ecbeb6@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/11/07, Ryan Shillington <ryanshillington at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Yup, the ruby is indented just fine.  The result of ":let b:eruby_subtype"
> is "b:eruby_subtype       html".

Hmm, does :scriptnames include .../indent/html.vim when run on an *.rhtml file?

What does :let b:eruby_subtype_indentexpr return?

Doug

From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Thu May 10 12:52:22 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:52:22 -0500
Subject: I can't indent html at all.
In-Reply-To: <154583e20705100811q7223c156n613eb40c1a747e57@mail.gmail.com>
References: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>
	<644fc65e0705092132sdb59cd6i412678370a1f9ebe@mail.gmail.com>
	<154583e20705100811q7223c156n613eb40c1a747e57@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070510165222.GB9632@tpope.us>

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:11:05AM -0500, Ryan Shillington wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> 
> Yup, the ruby is indented just fine.  The result of ":let b:eruby_subtype"
> is "b:eruby_subtype       html".
> 
> Thanks for the quick reply - I appreciate it.

In addition to what Doug asked you to check, can you tell me if you
have syntax highlighting and/or filetype plugins enabled?  If so, does
the syntax highlighting appear to be working correctly?

From ryanshillington at gmail.com  Fri May 11 09:57:16 2007
From: ryanshillington at gmail.com (Ryan Shillington)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:57:16 -0500
Subject: I can't indent html at all.
In-Reply-To: <20070510165222.GB9632@tpope.us>
References: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>
	<644fc65e0705092132sdb59cd6i412678370a1f9ebe@mail.gmail.com>
	<154583e20705100811q7223c156n613eb40c1a747e57@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070510165222.GB9632@tpope.us>
Message-ID: <154583e20705110657l74a194aal78de9c0c12eefab1@mail.gmail.com>

Yes, when I run :scriptnames line 35 is c:\vim\vim70\indent\html.vim. "let
b:eruby_subtype_indentexpr" returns "HtmlIndentGet(v:lnum)".

To Tim, yes, I do have syntax highlighting turned on, and it's working.  I
have the following lines in my _vimrc:

syntax on             " Enable syntax highlighting
filetype on           " Enable filetype detection
filetype indent on    " Enable filetype-specific indenting
filetype plugin on    " Enable filetype-specific plugins

Sorry to be such a pain.  Thanks again for your help.

Ryan



On 5/10/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:11:05AM -0500, Ryan Shillington wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > Yup, the ruby is indented just fine.  The result of ":let
> b:eruby_subtype"
> > is "b:eruby_subtype       html".
> >
> > Thanks for the quick reply - I appreciate it.
>
> In addition to what Doug asked you to check, can you tell me if you
> have syntax highlighting and/or filetype plugins enabled?  If so, does
> the syntax highlighting appear to be working correctly?
> _______________________________________________
> vim-ruby-devel mailing list
> vim-ruby-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/vim-ruby-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/vim-ruby-devel/attachments/20070511/64ffab46/attachment.html 

From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Fri May 11 11:04:13 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:04:13 -0500
Subject: I can't indent html at all.
In-Reply-To: <154583e20705110657l74a194aal78de9c0c12eefab1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>
	<644fc65e0705092132sdb59cd6i412678370a1f9ebe@mail.gmail.com>
	<154583e20705100811q7223c156n613eb40c1a747e57@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070510165222.GB9632@tpope.us>
	<154583e20705110657l74a194aal78de9c0c12eefab1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070511150413.GC9632@tpope.us>

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 08:57:16AM -0500, Ryan Shillington wrote:
> Yes, when I run :scriptnames line 35 is c:\vim\vim70\indent\html.vim. "let
> b:eruby_subtype_indentexpr" returns "HtmlIndentGet(v:lnum)".
> 
> To Tim, yes, I do have syntax highlighting turned on, and it's working.  I
> have the following lines in my _vimrc:
> 
> syntax on             " Enable syntax highlighting
> filetype on           " Enable filetype detection
> filetype indent on    " Enable filetype-specific indenting
> filetype plugin on    " Enable filetype-specific plugins
> 
> Sorry to be such a pain.  Thanks again for your help.
> 
> Ryan

Please check the value of "set indentexpr?" and confirm that it is
"GetErubyIndent()".  If it is, try putting the cursor on a line that
is indenting incorrectly (like line 2 of the following example)

<table>
<tr>

Then do

:let v:lnum = line(".")|echo GetErubyIndent()

This function is supposed to return the number of spaces that the line
should start with.  Tell me what it returns.  This might be an error
message, or multiple error messages.  If you have trouble copying and
pasting these errors, do

:redir @">

before the command and

redir END

afterwords.  This will copy the content where it can be pasted with
"p".

Cheers,
Tim

From gsinclair at gmail.com  Sun May 13 07:24:54 2007
From: gsinclair at gmail.com (Gavin Sinclair)
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:24:54 +1000
Subject: Change of administrator? (Was: Imminent Vim 7.1 release,
	can we make it?)
Message-ID: <a76b05c10705130424k5cdec5ecqe9d959978391140b@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/7/07, Doug Kearns <dougkearns at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm generally against mappings in ftplugins but I think these are both
> > helpful and benign.
> >
> > If anyone disagrees, by all means strip them out until we can discuss
> > them more.  I don't want them to hold up the release.
>
> Sounds good - I have no objections.  Gavin?

Sorry for the late reply.  No objections from me, but no need to
consult me, either :)

If someone would like to take over the administration of this project
from me, please do.  I'll still follow the list with interest, but the
reality is this: I haven't contributed anything for ages and that's
unlikely to change.

Doug: you've been managing releases and so on for quite a while.  Want
your name up in lights at Rubyforge? :)

Cheers,
Gavin

From ryanshillington at gmail.com  Sun May 13 19:02:25 2007
From: ryanshillington at gmail.com (Ryan Shillington)
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:02:25 -0500
Subject: I can't indent html at all.
In-Reply-To: <20070511150413.GC9632@tpope.us>
References: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>
	<644fc65e0705092132sdb59cd6i412678370a1f9ebe@mail.gmail.com>
	<154583e20705100811q7223c156n613eb40c1a747e57@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070510165222.GB9632@tpope.us>
	<154583e20705110657l74a194aal78de9c0c12eefab1@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070511150413.GC9632@tpope.us>
Message-ID: <154583e20705131602r2b92342n185b4b62debb454d@mail.gmail.com>

Yes, "set indentexpr?" returns "GetErubyIndent()".

When I put my cursor on the <tr> line in your example, I get zero - no error
messages.  Strange.

When I wrapped it in a ruby <% if %> statement, it returned 2 - so it's
returning the right number, its just not taking the HTML level into
account.   Really strange.

Ryan

On 5/11/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 08:57:16AM -0500, Ryan Shillington wrote:
> > Yes, when I run :scriptnames line 35 is c:\vim\vim70\indent\html.vim.
> "let
> > b:eruby_subtype_indentexpr" returns "HtmlIndentGet(v:lnum)".
> >
> > To Tim, yes, I do have syntax highlighting turned on, and it's
> working.  I
> > have the following lines in my _vimrc:
> >
> > syntax on             " Enable syntax highlighting
> > filetype on           " Enable filetype detection
> > filetype indent on    " Enable filetype-specific indenting
> > filetype plugin on    " Enable filetype-specific plugins
> >
> > Sorry to be such a pain.  Thanks again for your help.
> >
> > Ryan
>
> Please check the value of "set indentexpr?" and confirm that it is
> "GetErubyIndent()".  If it is, try putting the cursor on a line that
> is indenting incorrectly (like line 2 of the following example)
>
> <table>
> <tr>
>
> Then do
>
> :let v:lnum = line(".")|echo GetErubyIndent()
>
> This function is supposed to return the number of spaces that the line
> should start with.  Tell me what it returns.  This might be an error
> message, or multiple error messages.  If you have trouble copying and
> pasting these errors, do
>
> :redir @">
>
> before the command and
>
> redir END
>
> afterwords.  This will copy the content where it can be pasted with
> "p".
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> vim-ruby-devel mailing list
> vim-ruby-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/vim-ruby-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/vim-ruby-devel/attachments/20070513/f3ccec05/attachment-0001.html 

From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Sun May 13 22:06:25 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:06:25 -0500
Subject: I can't indent html at all.
In-Reply-To: <154583e20705131602r2b92342n185b4b62debb454d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <154583e20705092058m7f7accaaq7435366cb3ad747@mail.gmail.com>
	<644fc65e0705092132sdb59cd6i412678370a1f9ebe@mail.gmail.com>
	<154583e20705100811q7223c156n613eb40c1a747e57@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070510165222.GB9632@tpope.us>
	<154583e20705110657l74a194aal78de9c0c12eefab1@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070511150413.GC9632@tpope.us>
	<154583e20705131602r2b92342n185b4b62debb454d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070514020624.GB17588@tpope.us>

On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 06:02:25PM -0500, Ryan Shillington wrote:
> Yes, "set indentexpr?" returns "GetErubyIndent()".
> 
> When I put my cursor on the <tr> line in your example, I get zero - no error
> messages.  Strange.
> 
> When I wrapped it in a ruby <% if %> statement, it returned 2 - so it's
> returning the right number, its just not taking the HTML level into
> account.   Really strange.

Try :echo HtmlIndentGet(line('.')) and see what that says.  Then try
:set ft=html and the same echo command and see if it changes.

You should also to try experimenting with removing all other plugins.
I'm starting to suspect foul play on someone else's part.

Cheers,
Tim

From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Wed May 16 01:44:29 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:44:29 -0500
Subject: ruby << EOF in vimscript broken in Vim 7.1
Message-ID: <20070516054429.GG17588@tpope.us>

Hi all,

As the subject states, the following is broken in Vim script syntax
highlighting in 7.1.  This was overlooked because vim.vim always
sources the ruby.vim from the current directory, not the one from the
runtimepath.

ruby << EOF
  def foo
  end
EOF

Apparently, the use of TOP is taken to mean vim script, not ruby,
even though it is declared in vim script.  Most of this is inside the
"expensive" ruby block stuff.  Skipping this (ala eruby) might be a
cheap way to fix this problem.  Anyone have any other easy ideas?

I'll look at the more tomorrow; I just wanted to get it out there so
people can think about it.

Cheers,
Tim

From dougkearns at gmail.com  Wed May 16 10:52:31 2007
From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 00:52:31 +1000
Subject: ruby << EOF in vimscript broken in Vim 7.1
In-Reply-To: <20070516054429.GG17588@tpope.us>
References: <20070516054429.GG17588@tpope.us>
Message-ID: <644fc65e0705160752s3aa3c4dbj464eb664616c3a4a@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/16/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As the subject states, the following is broken in Vim script syntax
> highlighting in 7.1.  This was overlooked because vim.vim always
> sources the ruby.vim from the current directory, not the one from the
> runtimepath.

Hmmm...doesn't seem like a good idea to me but this inclusion method
is quite common in the syntax files.  What am I missing?

> ruby << EOF
>   def foo
>   end
> EOF
>
> Apparently, the use of TOP is taken to mean vim script, not ruby,
> even though it is declared in vim script.  Most of this is inside the
> "expensive" ruby block stuff.  Skipping this (ala eruby) might be a
> cheap way to fix this problem.  Anyone have any other easy ideas?

Yeah, it sounds like a problem for Chip. :)

> I'll look at the more tomorrow; I just wanted to get it out there so
> people can think about it.

That would be great if you can - I won't be able to get to it until
next week.  Fortunately, you may be the only one currently in need of
a fix. ;-)

Regards,
Doug

From dougkearns at gmail.com  Wed May 16 11:00:31 2007
From: dougkearns at gmail.com (Doug Kearns)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:00:31 +1000
Subject: Change of administrator? (Was: Imminent Vim 7.1 release,
	can we make it?)
In-Reply-To: <a76b05c10705130424k5cdec5ecqe9d959978391140b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a76b05c10705130424k5cdec5ecqe9d959978391140b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <644fc65e0705160800i441103eaqb116f7de15296cc7@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Gavin,

On 5/13/07, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Doug Kearns <dougkearns at gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

> Sorry for the late reply.  No objections from me, but no need to
> consult me, either :)

Heh, you're still the maintainer and IIRC you were quite keen on
keeping it basic.

> If someone would like to take over the administration of this project
> from me, please do.  I'll still follow the list with interest, but the
> reality is this: I haven't contributed anything for ages and that's
> unlikely to change.
>
> Doug: you've been managing releases and so on for quite a while.  Want
> your name up in lights at Rubyforge? :)

Well, I tend to shun publicity but I suspect my anonymity is safe even
if I do accept your offer. ;-)

Actually, you Tim and I are all listed as administrators.  What extra
powers are you offering to relinquish?

Regards,
Doug

From vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info  Wed May 16 11:47:32 2007
From: vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info (Tim Pope)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:47:32 -0500
Subject: ruby << EOF in vimscript broken in Vim 7.1
In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0705160752s3aa3c4dbj464eb664616c3a4a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20070516054429.GG17588@tpope.us>
	<644fc65e0705160752s3aa3c4dbj464eb664616c3a4a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070516154732.GJ17588@tpope.us>

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 12:52:31AM +1000, Doug Kearns wrote:
> On 5/16/07, Tim Pope <vim-ruby-devel at tpope.info> wrote:
> > I'll look at the more tomorrow; I just wanted to get it out there so
> > people can think about it.
> 
> That would be great if you can - I won't be able to get to it until
> next week.  Fortunately, you may be the only one currently in need of
> a fix. ;-)

I was actually researching another problem when I discovered this.
All the rails specific omnicompletion (and probably, everything
involving buffer loading), has stopped working for me as of 7.1, even
with all applicable optios set and identical versions of
rubycomplete.vim.  Mark Guzman, can you shed any light on this?

I'm a bit short on time this week myself, as I am attending RailsConf
this weekend.  There's still plenty of time before Vim 7.2 though, and
I've already gotten started.

One thing I have discovered so far:  There are only 23 uses of
contains=TOP in all the syntax files shipped with vim.  Of those, 17
are in ruby.vim.  Apparently, this feature isn't used nearly as widely
as I would have expected.  The more common solution involves ALLBUT.
ALLBUT does work as you would hope when a syntax file is included,
also discluding groups from the contained file, whereas TOP dumbly
takes the TOP of the including file (if that makes sense at all).

I originally switched to using TOP because it seemed cleaner than
constantly updating the list of discluded groups.  I am switching to
using contains=ALLBUT, at rubyNotTop.  This appears to fix the issue.
Keep an eye out for groups I forgot to add to the rubyNotTop cluster.

After the dust settles (maybe give it a couple of weeks), I'd like to
see a bugfix release, if nobody minds.  Unfortunately, syntax/vim.vim
will still read the ruby.vim that ships with Vim unless users take an
additional step.  But, at least we will have made that much possible.

Cheers,
Tim

From gsinclair at gmail.com  Fri May 18 11:50:28 2007
From: gsinclair at gmail.com (Gavin Sinclair)
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 01:50:28 +1000
Subject: Change of administrator? (Was: Imminent Vim 7.1 release,
	can we make it?)
In-Reply-To: <644fc65e0705160800i441103eaqb116f7de15296cc7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a76b05c10705130424k5cdec5ecqe9d959978391140b@mail.gmail.com>
	<644fc65e0705160800i441103eaqb116f7de15296cc7@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a76b05c10705180850i1c6b71d7h918cc70c475482a3@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/17/07, Doug Kearns <dougkearns at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the late reply.  No objections from me, but no need to
> > consult me, either :)
>
> Heh, you're still the maintainer and IIRC you were quite keen on
> keeping it basic.

It never occurred to me that whatever was being discussed was not
basic.  I probably didn't fully understand it anyway :)

> > If someone would like to take over the administration of this project
> > from me, please do.  I'll still follow the list with interest, but the
> > reality is this: I haven't contributed anything for ages and that's
> > unlikely to change.
> >
> > Doug: you've been managing releases and so on for quite a while.  Want
> > your name up in lights at Rubyforge? :)
>
> Well, I tend to shun publicity but I suspect my anonymity is safe even
> if I do accept your offer. ;-)
>
> Actually, you Tim and I are all listed as administrators.  What extra
> powers are you offering to relinquish?

Good point.  I'm offering to relinquish any presumption among other
people that I need to be consulted on changes.  If people want to make
drastic changes to the project, so be it.  Even if I objected, I
wouldn't pretend that my objection would count for anything :)

It's good that you two are administrators; it means the project is in
good hands.

Gavin

From segfault at hasno.info  Fri May 18 22:30:49 2007
From: segfault at hasno.info (Mark Guzman)
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:30:49 -0400
Subject: ruby << EOF in vimscript broken in Vim 7.1
In-Reply-To: <20070516154732.GJ17588@tpope.us>
References: <20070516054429.GG17588@tpope.us>	<644fc65e0705160752s3aa3c4dbj464eb664616c3a4a@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070516154732.GJ17588@tpope.us>
Message-ID: <464E6159.4050702@hasno.info>

Tim Pope wrote:
> I was actually researching another problem when I discovered this.
> All the rails specific omnicompletion (and probably, everything
> involving buffer loading), has stopped working for me as of 7.1, even
> with all applicable optios set and identical versions of
> rubycomplete.vim.  Mark Guzman, can you shed any light on this?

I'll look into it this weekend, I've been working on overhauling the
rubycomplete stuff anyway. Can you email me tarball of your vim config
and possibly point me at some example code where it breaks? My initial
testing under windows, linux and osx doesn't show any issue currently.
I'm testing with mephisto on all platforms and it's possible that
something that's getting loaded from the buffer is effecting the
completion stuff. The probability on that last one is pretty low, as
the current version doesn't load the actual code from the buffer, only
skeletal method/class definitions.
   --mark


From segfault at hasno.info  Sun May 20 15:50:25 2007
From: segfault at hasno.info (Mark Guzman)
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:50:25 -0400
Subject: ruby << EOF in vimscript broken in Vim 7.1
In-Reply-To: <464E6159.4050702@hasno.info>
References: <20070516054429.GG17588@tpope.us>	<644fc65e0705160752s3aa3c4dbj464eb664616c3a4a@mail.gmail.com>	<20070516154732.GJ17588@tpope.us>
	<464E6159.4050702@hasno.info>
Message-ID: <4650A681.2030305@hasno.info>

Mark Guzman wrote:
> Tim Pope wrote:
>> I was actually researching another problem when I discovered this.
>> All the rails specific omnicompletion (and probably, everything
>> involving buffer loading), has stopped working for me as of 7.1, even
>> with all applicable optios set and identical versions of
>> rubycomplete.vim.  Mark Guzman, can you shed any light on this?
Just to keep you updated, I've managed to trigger a bug. I don't know
if it's related but I am working on it currently. It seems to involve
trying to complete variables inside of a class definition while
editing a rails file.
  --mark