More syntax highlighting fun

Doug Kearns dougkearns at
Tue Feb 27 03:54:49 EST 2007

On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:15:29AM -0600, Tim Pope wrote:

> Actually, this omission was intentional.  I figure if the end is on
> the next line, the far more likely explanation is the user simply
> hasn't typed the method name yet.  But we can try it this way too.

Given that I've never seen, and can't find, any of these 'multi-line'
method definitions feel free to change it back if you think it's too


More information about the vim-ruby-devel mailing list