More syntax highlighting fun
dougkearns at gmail.com
Tue Feb 27 03:54:49 EST 2007
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:15:29AM -0600, Tim Pope wrote:
> Actually, this omission was intentional. I figure if the end is on
> the next line, the far more likely explanation is the user simply
> hasn't typed the method name yet. But we can try it this way too.
Given that I've never seen, and can't find, any of these 'multi-line'
method definitions feel free to change it back if you think it's too
More information about the vim-ruby-devel