preliminary rubycomplete documentation for review
dougkearns at gmail.com
Fri Apr 21 03:42:05 EDT 2006
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:35:34AM +1000, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> Perhaps if the ft-ruby-omni docs included a link to the website people
> would know where to look for updates and updated information.
Well they should know to look in the runtime file header. That's why
it's there - same as any other runtime file.
> Also, if it's embedded, people should know that compiling with +ruby
> is a necessary but not sufficient condition for omni completion: it
> must be enabled in the .vimrc or (better) an ftplugin file. Another
> reason to link to vim-ruby.rubyforge.org.
This is no different from all the other omni scripts - they all have the
same requirements which are documented in the Vim help.
> I must confess I hadn't realised that the Ruby *syntax* docs were
> embedded. Since they are, let's ensure the omni ones are too.
Hmmm, must be because the defaults are so spectacularly good.
> And what about a website link in the syntax docs, Doug?
Well if we're going to go down this path perhaps we could also consider
creating a file like:
More information about the vim-ruby-devel