current version

Mark Guzman segfault at
Thu Apr 20 03:40:53 EDT 2006

Doug Kearns wrote:
> Hmmm, it's already in the list? It seems the "Fo" just isn't being
> passed as the partial match. What am I missing?
> <snip>
>> Should I attempt to load all of the in-buffer classes in the case your
>> describing?
> Seems reasonable to a user. ;-)
Can do. Not sure why its showing up on your end. I'll make sure I'm
running the current cvs and try again on my side.
Was the text in the email the only stuff in the buffer?

sic transit gloria et adulescentia 
blog |
wiki |

More information about the vim-ruby-devel mailing list