dougkearns at gmail.com
Thu Apr 20 03:31:53 EDT 2006
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:15:34AM -0400, Mark Guzman wrote:
> Doug Kearns wrote:
> > Should Foobar be the only string offered for completion below? It's not
> > currently working for me. It just offers up the entire
> > class/constant/global list - the partial "Fo" is being ignored.
> > class Foobar; end
> > x = Fo|
> > Would it be better if this class/constant/global list was initially
> > sorted?
> Without loading every class in the buffer that can't be completed.
Hmmm, it's already in the list? It seems the "Fo" just isn't being
passed as the partial match. What am I missing?
> Should I attempt to load all of the in-buffer classes in the case your
Seems reasonable to me...as a user. ;-)
More information about the vim-ruby-devel