Indent wierdness.

[Nikolai Weibull]

Hugh Sasse wrote:

>    def metaclass; class << self; self; end; end

Problem with counting of def and class versus ends.  We only see things
at the beginning of the line.

So don't write it in the shrivelled-up-I’m-in-a-book kind of way;
instead, write it as:


  def metaclass
    class << self; self; end
  end

That won’t fool the indenter.  Perhaps we can rewrite the regular
expressions to do this kind of stuff, but I don’t remember if there were
issues with doing so.

If you want, please try redefining s:end_start_regex so that it can find
the ‘class’ in the above example as well.  That’d solve a lot of issues.
Perhaps my reasoning has been far too restrictive when it comes to that
variable.  You can try something like

let s:end_start_regex = '\%(^\|[^.:]\)\@<=\<\%(module\|class\|def\|if' .
        \ '\|for\|while\|until\|case\|unless\|begin\|do\)\>'

and report back on how that works.  It solves the issues you were having
now, but please verify that it doesn’t introduce something nasty....

Thanks,
        nikolai

-- 
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}