hgs at dmu.ac.uk
Thu Oct 13 10:36:57 EDT 2005
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Doug Kearns wrote:
> Does anyone have any objections to releasing these files under of the
> Vim license rather than the GPL?
Not sure about "rather than" -- "both" makes sense, but if something's
GPL'd doesn't it get the RMS::Freedom meme tag that means it can't
be un-GPL'd? [An infinite number of licence lawyers with an
infinite number of keyboards....wouldn't help]
> As Nikolai predicted Bram would prefer it.
> I don't actually remember the reason this occurred...
More information about the vim-ruby-devel