License

[Hugh Sasse]

On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Doug Kearns wrote:

> Does anyone have any objections to releasing these files under of the
> Vim license rather than the GPL?

Not sure about "rather than" -- "both" makes sense, but if something's
GPL'd doesn't it get the RMS::Freedom meme tag that means it can't
be un-GPL'd?    [An infinite number of licence lawyers with an
infinite number of keyboards....wouldn't help]
> 
> As Nikolai predicted Bram would prefer it.
> 
> I don't actually remember the reason this occurred...
> 
> Thanks,
> Doug

        Hugh