gsinclair at soyabean.com.au
Mon Apr 25 23:04:15 EDT 2005
On Tuesday, April 26, 2005, 4:28:36 AM, Hugh wrote:
> Is the CVS considered stable now? I ask because I have just updated
> vim on one machine by some 40 patches, and considering the next step
> notice that
> displays files some 7 months old (2004-09-20).
You mean 40 patches to vim itself? What's the "next step" you're
Anyway, AFAIK the CVS is stable, but can't guarantee it :) I'd advise
you to use it.
I guess it's time for another release.
More information about the vim-ruby-devel