Syntax highlighting again.
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
hgs at dmu.ac.uk
Fri Apr 16 17:31:29 EDT 2004
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Doug Kearns wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 03:02:58PM +0100, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
> > The "end" of ANSIColor.make_code is not matched properly although the
> > syntax is picked up as being ruby AFAICS. Any ideas what is happening
> > here?
> Because sh.vim is doing this: setlocal isk+=. and ruby.vim doesn't reset
> it, which I'm not sure it should have to really. There are 388 syntax
> files and only 58 of them explicitly set 'iskeyword'.
> Maybe all other syntax files should implicitly run
> :setlocal iskeyword&
I'm somewhat out of my depth now. Since you say you are not sure it
should have to set this, and then maybe all of them should, I'm
wondeirng if sh.vim or ruby.vim should be changed....
More information about the vim-ruby-devel