[holy ruby programmers batman!] Adding a configuration file to Utility Belt
markus.prinz at qsig.org
Mon Dec 24 14:28:25 EST 2007
On 24.12.2007, at 19:35, Giles Bowkett wrote:
> PDI = please do investigate
Ah, I see. Thanks.
> It looks good. This is probably presumptuous of me but I think the
> best thing to do with Wirble is fold it into the gadgets category so
> that people can equip it or not as they choose, and further treat
> Wirble's syntax coloring as an additional gadget, and fit that into
> this gadgets system by just creating a "gadget" file in lib which just
> and keep the Wirble.init in utility_belt.rb.
That'd be no problem.
> There's only a few things I'ld change, which is that I'd rather see
> the UtilityBelt.equip calls in .irbrc as opposed to an additional
They are in .irbrc, since Avdi Grimm pointed out that having an
additional config file wasn't really necessary, and I agree.
> I think I'd go for a "best of" default rather than making :all
> the default,
Wouldn't be a hard change. All you need to edit is the call in the
IRB_RC-lambda to UtilityBelt.equip, in utility_belt.rb.
> and last but not least allowing people to specify their
> :except gadgets as Strings, Symbols, or Arrays of either one.
I can update the patch for all these, if you want.
Oh, and is the git-patch-format fine or do you prefer another format?
> But I'm expecting to merge this in over the next few days.
More information about the Utilitybelt-tinkering