From rochkind at jhu.edu Wed Dec 15 12:12:59 2010 From: rochkind at jhu.edu (Jonathan Rochkind) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] SearchController refactored, now with Sfx4 support, hooray Message-ID: <4D08F71B.6030609@jhu.edu> I have added support for Sfx4 to Umlaut SearchController for A-Z lookups. This involved refactoring the SearchController somewhat extensively, so while Sfx3 is still supported, and tested by me, it's possible that there may be bugs in even Sfx3 support, so advise testing in your local environment before deploying. To choose between Sfx3 vs Sfx4, one of these in one of your initializers, such as umlaut_properties.rb: AppConfig::Base.az_search_method = SearchMethods::Sfx4 AppConfig::Base.az_search_method = SearchMethods::Sfx3 Sfx4 is actually the default, so you want to set it if you are using Sfx3. Recall that the only thing all this matters for is the A-Z list and title searching, which is currently implemented with a direct mysql database connection to SFX, and the relevant schema changed between 3 and 4. For standard 'resolve' behavior, the SFX API is used, which has not changed between 3 and 4. However, it turns out the old code was so weird and buggy that it wasn't neccesarily using the right tables in Sfx3, so do advise upgrading even if you plan to stick with Sfx3. The old code was accidentally always using the so-called "AZ-version 2" tables in SFX -- which contrary to their name were used at first in SFX3, but hasn't been used by SFX3 for some months -- so in many installations, including my own, those "ver2" tables hadn't been updated in many months -- which means I've been basing my Umlaut A-Z search for months on an old snapshot of titles in the KB! Oops. Oddly, none of my users seem to have noticed, or at any rate brought it to my attention. The SearchController code was a pretty tangled mess of complicated nested if statements, and methods hanging around which didn't actually work anymore and weren't used anymore, but were still hanging around. It was some of the first ruby code I ever wrote, and wasn't pretty. (The first draft by rsinger that I took over may have been some of the first ruby code he ever wrote too, heh). So I've cleaned it up some, although it's still a bit odd, it's better. Now there are various search strategies that may be defined in modules that live in app/controllers/search_strategies -- applying a particular module to the SearchController (actually via self.extend in the SearchController initializer, so theoretically it could be decided on a request-by-request basis, although logic isn't currently there for that and probably isn't needed) effectively chooses your search method. Both the Sfx3 and the Sfx4 methods connect directly to the Sfx mysql database. The Sfx3 method actually modelled the Sfx database in ActiveRecord model objects. Although this worked, it ended up being a pain, since they are such a 'legacy' schema violating every AR convention. So for the new Sfx4 method, realizing there were only a few simple reverse-engineered queries I'd ever want to write against the SFX db, I instead just wrote raw SQL, instead of trying to create ActiveRecord model objects. That ended up being a different kind of pain! Heh, so I don't know which is actually best, both end up being kind of messy. There were aborted attempts at different search methods hanging around in the previous SearchController -- a method based on a local database of title information; a method that actually used the SFX API. Neither were actually working in Umlaut, but rather than delete the code entirely, I stuck it in additional search_method modules, with commented warnings that it's just a sketch/draft of ideas, not currently working. [There was other code I deleted entirely, such as a non-working attempt to provide atom results for searches]. But overall, in addition to now supporting Sfx4, I think the code is in better shape to later support additional search methods -- such as a search against a local database of titles (perhaps imported from the SFX kb, or some other kb), or a search against some other vendor's knowledge base directly using their API's. Jonathan From scot.dalton at nyu.edu Wed Dec 15 19:14:43 2010 From: scot.dalton at nyu.edu (Scot Dalton) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] SearchController refactored, now with Sfx4 support, hooray In-Reply-To: <4D08F71B.6030609@jhu.edu> References: <4D08F71B.6030609@jhu.edu> Message-ID: That's fantastic! Thanks for taking care of this, Jonathan. -Scot On Dec 15, 2010, at Dec 15, 12:12 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: > I have added support for Sfx4 to Umlaut SearchController for A-Z lookups. > > This involved refactoring the SearchController somewhat extensively, so while Sfx3 is still supported, and tested by me, it's possible that there may be bugs in even Sfx3 support, so advise testing in your local environment before deploying. > > To choose between Sfx3 vs Sfx4, one of these in one of your initializers, such as umlaut_properties.rb: > > AppConfig::Base.az_search_method = SearchMethods::Sfx4 > AppConfig::Base.az_search_method = SearchMethods::Sfx3 > > Sfx4 is actually the default, so you want to set it if you are using Sfx3. Recall that the only thing all this matters for is the A-Z list and title searching, which is currently implemented with a direct mysql database connection to SFX, and the relevant schema changed between 3 and 4. For standard 'resolve' behavior, the SFX API is used, which has not changed between 3 and 4. > > However, it turns out the old code was so weird and buggy that it wasn't neccesarily using the right tables in Sfx3, so do advise upgrading even if you plan to stick with Sfx3. The old code was accidentally always using the so-called "AZ-version 2" tables in SFX -- which contrary to their name were used at first in SFX3, but hasn't been used by SFX3 for some months -- so in many installations, including my own, those "ver2" tables hadn't been updated in many months -- which means I've been basing my Umlaut A-Z search for months on an old snapshot of titles in the KB! Oops. Oddly, none of my users seem to have noticed, or at any rate brought it to my attention. > > The SearchController code was a pretty tangled mess of complicated nested if statements, and methods hanging around which didn't actually work anymore and weren't used anymore, but were still hanging around. It was some of the first ruby code I ever wrote, and wasn't pretty. (The first draft by rsinger that I took over may have been some of the first ruby code he ever wrote too, heh). > > So I've cleaned it up some, although it's still a bit odd, it's better. Now there are various search strategies that may be defined in modules that live in app/controllers/search_strategies -- applying a particular module to the SearchController (actually via self.extend in the SearchController initializer, so theoretically it could be decided on a request-by-request basis, although logic isn't currently there for that and probably isn't needed) effectively chooses your search method. > > Both the Sfx3 and the Sfx4 methods connect directly to the Sfx mysql database. The Sfx3 method actually modelled the Sfx database in ActiveRecord model objects. Although this worked, it ended up being a pain, since they are such a 'legacy' schema violating every AR convention. So for the new Sfx4 method, realizing there were only a few simple reverse-engineered queries I'd ever want to write against the SFX db, I instead just wrote raw SQL, instead of trying to create ActiveRecord model objects. That ended up being a different kind of pain! Heh, so I don't know which is actually best, both end up being kind of messy. > > There were aborted attempts at different search methods hanging around in the previous SearchController -- a method based on a local database of title information; a method that actually used the SFX API. Neither were actually working in Umlaut, but rather than delete the code entirely, I stuck it in additional search_method modules, with commented warnings that it's just a sketch/draft of ideas, not currently working. [There was other code I deleted entirely, such as a non-working attempt to provide atom results for searches]. > > But overall, in addition to now supporting Sfx4, I think the code is in better shape to later support additional search methods -- such as a search against a local database of titles (perhaps imported from the SFX kb, or some other kb), or a search against some other vendor's knowledge base directly using their API's. > > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general -- Scot Dalton Phone: (212) 998-2674 Web Services Division of Libraries New York University From dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu Thu Dec 30 14:47:37 2010 From: dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu (Poulter, Dale) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:47:37 -0600 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Message-ID: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jonesa at newschool.edu Thu Dec 30 17:34:14 2010 From: jonesa at newschool.edu (Allen Jones) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Message-ID: <712B9BDA-DE53-437A-B681-2DBB57A64590@newschool.edu> Dale, Please see http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/umlaut-general/2010-December/000363.html for further info. I was planning on asking the same question, but this post seemed to answer many of my questions. Allen Jones The New School On Dec 30, 2010, at 14:47, "Poulter, Dale" wrote: > Good afternoon all, > > > > Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? > > > > --Dale > > > > --------------------------------------- > Dale Poulter > Automation Coordinator > > Library Information Technology Services > Vanderbilt University > > 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 > Nashville, TN 37203-2427 > (615)343-5388 > (615)343-8834 (fax) > (615)207-9705 (cell) > dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu > > > > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu Thu Dec 30 19:28:09 2010 From: dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu (Poulter, Dale) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:28:09 -0600 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <712B9BDA-DE53-437A-B681-2DBB57A64590@newschool.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <712B9BDA-DE53-437A-B681-2DBB57A64590@newschool.edu> Message-ID: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E421689D0@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Allen, Thanks. I was able to make the change to the umlaut_properties.rb file and restart the server. However, the system seems to still be sending requests for SFX v3. Here is the error Mysql::Error: Table 'vu.AZ_TITLE_VER3' doesn't exist: SHOW FIELDS FROM `AZ_TITLE_VER3` From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Allen Jones Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 4:34 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Cc: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Dale, Please see http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/umlaut-general/2010-December/000363.html for further info. I was planning on asking the same question, but this post seemed to answer many of my questions. Allen Jones The New School On Dec 30, 2010, at 14:47, "Poulter, Dale" > wrote: Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rochkind at jhu.edu Thu Dec 30 20:19:13 2010 From: rochkind at jhu.edu (Jonathan Rochkind) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E421689D0@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <712B9BDA-DE53-437A-B681-2DBB57A64590@newschool.edu>, <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E421689D0@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Message-ID: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C542@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> Hmm, I'm not having that problem, not sure why you are. Have you changed the sfx_db definition in your database.yml file to point to your SFX4 server? Have you updated your Umlaut to the latest version that includes the SFX4 functionality? ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 7:28 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Allen, Thanks. I was able to make the change to the umlaut_properties.rb file and restart the server. However, the system seems to still be sending requests for SFX v3. Here is the error Mysql::Error: Table 'vu.AZ_TITLE_VER3' doesn't exist: SHOW FIELDS FROM `AZ_TITLE_VER3` From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Allen Jones Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 4:34 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Cc: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Dale, Please see http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/umlaut-general/2010-December/000363.html for further info. I was planning on asking the same question, but this post seemed to answer many of my questions. Allen Jones The New School On Dec 30, 2010, at 14:47, "Poulter, Dale" > wrote: Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general From dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu Fri Dec 31 08:21:17 2010 From: dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu (Poulter, Dale) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 07:21:17 -0600 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C542@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <712B9BDA-DE53-437A-B681-2DBB57A64590@newschool.edu>, <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E421689D0@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C542@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> Message-ID: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E421689D8@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> I obtained the code earlier this week using svn checkout http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/tags/2.10.0 ./Umlaut. However, I did a svn update just in case this morning to confirm that I have the latest version. The sfx_db definition does point to the sfx v4 server. The only change for v4 that I have made is to add AppConfig::Base.az_search_method = 'SearchMethods::Sfx4' to the umlaut_properties.rb file. Am I missing something? -----Original Message----- From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 7:19 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Hmm, I'm not having that problem, not sure why you are. Have you changed the sfx_db definition in your database.yml file to point to your SFX4 server? Have you updated your Umlaut to the latest version that includes the SFX4 functionality? ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 7:28 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Allen, Thanks. I was able to make the change to the umlaut_properties.rb file and restart the server. However, the system seems to still be sending requests for SFX v3. Here is the error Mysql::Error: Table 'vu.AZ_TITLE_VER3' doesn't exist: SHOW FIELDS FROM `AZ_TITLE_VER3` From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Allen Jones Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 4:34 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Cc: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Dale, Please see http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/umlaut-general/2010-December/000363.html for further info. I was planning on asking the same question, but this post seemed to answer many of my questions. Allen Jones The New School On Dec 30, 2010, at 14:47, "Poulter, Dale" > wrote: Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general From rochkind at jhu.edu Fri Dec 31 11:21:54 2010 From: rochkind at jhu.edu (Jonathan Rochkind) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Message-ID: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu From dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu Fri Dec 31 11:32:33 2010 From: dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu (Poulter, Dale) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:32:33 -0600 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> Message-ID: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Currently we are not using it. I have received several requests to investigate as an option for us but we are still in the early stages. -----Original Message----- From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:22 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general From rochkind at jhu.edu Fri Dec 31 11:44:13 2010 From: rochkind at jhu.edu (Jonathan Rochkind) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu>, <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Message-ID: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C547@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> You know what, I'm pretty sure the problem is that I never tagged a new version with the SFX4 functionality -- please do a checkout of current 'master' rather than the tagged 2.10.0, which I believe is old. The SFX4 functionality hasn't actually been deployed in production yet here where i work (we haven't switched our SFX4 to production), so I was waiting to do that before tagging a new release, making sure I was eating my own dogfood before suggesting it for others. I've also perhaps been a bit sloppy with Umlaut release management, because the very small number of institutions currently using Umlaut seemed not to absolutely require it, and, you know, time and lazy. I do have some plans for making Umlaut quite a lot easier to install and maintain, that involve moving Umlaut to a Rails3 engine-as-gem instead of an independent rails application, as well as moving the Umlaut code to github. I have talked to my supervisor who has generally agreed that this would be a good use of my time -- but got to meet some milestones for our Blacklight project before I can attend to it. I just put this in to try and provide some evidence that Umlaut is definitely not a moribund project; that I think it's not as easy to install as it could be and I hope to make it -- BUT, I think it is still 'good enough' that I do encourage you to investigate it now, definitely let me know what problems you have so I can know what needs improvement -- and/but if it ends up being too hard to get going, you should still check back later after I've found time to improve it. I am VERY interested/eager/excited to have other institutions use Umlaut -- especially institutions that are willing to occasionally get their hands dirty debugging and submitting patches, as Scot at NYU has been awesome at -- so am happy to try to help you get going as my time allows, do feel free to ask any questions you have. ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:32 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Currently we are not using it. I have received several requests to investigate as an option for us but we are still in the early stages. -----Original Message----- From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:22 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general From rochkind at jhu.edu Fri Dec 31 11:09:35 2010 From: rochkind at jhu.edu (Jonathan Rochkind) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E421689D8@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <712B9BDA-DE53-437A-B681-2DBB57A64590@newschool.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E421689D0@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C542@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu>, <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E421689D8@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Message-ID: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C543@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> You are not missing anything intended by me! In fact, with the latest code checkout, you shouldn't even need the "AppConfig::Base.az_search_method = 'SearchMethods::Sfx4' " line, that should be the default. But apparently there's some kind of bug in my code, it's not working as I intended. Perhaps I neglected to commit some file to svn which is just in my local server -- or didn't tag quite the right version as 2.10.0. Can you try doing a checkout of the latest master and seeing if you can still reproduce? When I'm back at work next week, I'll do a fresh checkout and see if I can reproduce your problem. Reproducing it is the first step to fixing it; if I can't... maybe if you could give me access to your server somehow, I could try to debug it on your server. Or else if you want to do some debugging yourself to try to track it down, I can give you some tips, that would be very helpful if you wanted to try to debug. Please try to send me an email next week, to remind me to look into this? Jonathan ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 8:21 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 I obtained the code earlier this week using svn checkout http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/tags/2.10.0 ./Umlaut. However, I did a svn update just in case this morning to confirm that I have the latest version. The sfx_db definition does point to the sfx v4 server. The only change for v4 that I have made is to add AppConfig::Base.az_search_method = 'SearchMethods::Sfx4' to the umlaut_properties.rb file. Am I missing something? -----Original Message----- From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 7:19 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Hmm, I'm not having that problem, not sure why you are. Have you changed the sfx_db definition in your database.yml file to point to your SFX4 server? Have you updated your Umlaut to the latest version that includes the SFX4 functionality? ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 7:28 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Allen, Thanks. I was able to make the change to the umlaut_properties.rb file and restart the server. However, the system seems to still be sending requests for SFX v3. Here is the error Mysql::Error: Table 'vu.AZ_TITLE_VER3' doesn't exist: SHOW FIELDS FROM `AZ_TITLE_VER3` From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Allen Jones Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 4:34 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Cc: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Dale, Please see http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/umlaut-general/2010-December/000363.html for further info. I was planning on asking the same question, but this post seemed to answer many of my questions. Allen Jones The New School On Dec 30, 2010, at 14:47, "Poulter, Dale" > wrote: Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general From rochkind at jhu.edu Fri Dec 31 12:21:05 2010 From: rochkind at jhu.edu (Jonathan Rochkind) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C547@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu>, <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C547@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> Message-ID: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C549@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> Oh, and you can use "svn switch" to switch your checkout to 'master' instead of the 2.10.0 in place. But once you've svn check out 2.10.0 tag, unless you do a switch, future 'svn up's won't get you a new version, you've locked to 2.10.0. I'm starting to forget the idiosyncracies of svn, prefering the idiosyncracies of git instead these days, heh. ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind [rochkind at jhu.edu] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:44 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 You know what, I'm pretty sure the problem is that I never tagged a new version with the SFX4 functionality -- please do a checkout of current 'master' rather than the tagged 2.10.0, which I believe is old. The SFX4 functionality hasn't actually been deployed in production yet here where i work (we haven't switched our SFX4 to production), so I was waiting to do that before tagging a new release, making sure I was eating my own dogfood before suggesting it for others. I've also perhaps been a bit sloppy with Umlaut release management, because the very small number of institutions currently using Umlaut seemed not to absolutely require it, and, you know, time and lazy. I do have some plans for making Umlaut quite a lot easier to install and maintain, that involve moving Umlaut to a Rails3 engine-as-gem instead of an independent rails application, as well as moving the Umlaut code to github. I have talked to my supervisor who has generally agreed that this would be a good use of my time -- but got to meet some milestones for our Blacklight project before I can attend to it. I just put this in to try and provide some evidence that Umlaut is definitely not a moribund project; that I think it's not as easy to install as it could be and I hope to make it -- BUT, I think it is still 'good enough' that I do encourage you to investigate it now, definitely let me know what problems you have so I can know what needs improvement -- and/but if it ends up being too hard to get going, you should still check back later after I've found time to improve it. I am VERY interested/eager/excited to have other institutions use Umlaut -- especially institutions that are willing to occasionally get their hands dirty debugging and submitting patches, as Scot at NYU has been awesome at -- so am happy to try to help you get going as my time allows, do feel free to ask any questions you have. ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:32 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Currently we are not using it. I have received several requests to investigate as an option for us but we are still in the early stages. -----Original Message----- From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:22 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general From dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu Fri Dec 31 13:16:38 2010 From: dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu (Poulter, Dale) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:16:38 -0600 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C549@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu>, <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C547@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C549@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> Message-ID: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A15@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Master does not seem to be available. I have tried the following: [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/tags/master ./Umlaut svn: Target path '/branches/tags/master' does not exist [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/master ./Umlaut svn: Target path '/branches/master' does not exist [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/master ./Umlaut svn: Target path '/master' does not exist -----Original Message----- From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:21 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Oh, and you can use "svn switch" to switch your checkout to 'master' instead of the 2.10.0 in place. But once you've svn check out 2.10.0 tag, unless you do a switch, future 'svn up's won't get you a new version, you've locked to 2.10.0. I'm starting to forget the idiosyncracies of svn, prefering the idiosyncracies of git instead these days, heh. ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind [rochkind at jhu.edu] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:44 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 You know what, I'm pretty sure the problem is that I never tagged a new version with the SFX4 functionality -- please do a checkout of current 'master' rather than the tagged 2.10.0, which I believe is old. The SFX4 functionality hasn't actually been deployed in production yet here where i work (we haven't switched our SFX4 to production), so I was waiting to do that before tagging a new release, making sure I was eating my own dogfood before suggesting it for others. I've also perhaps been a bit sloppy with Umlaut release management, because the very small number of institutions currently using Umlaut seemed not to absolutely require it, and, you know, time and lazy. I do have some plans for making Umlaut quite a lot easier to install and maintain, that involve moving Umlaut to a Rails3 engine-as-gem instead of an independent rails application, as well as moving the Umlaut code to github. I have talked to my supervisor who has generally agreed that this would be a good use of my time -- but got to meet some milestones for our Blacklight project before I can attend to it. I just put this in to try and provide some evidence that Umlaut is definitely not a moribund project; that I think it's not as easy to install as it could be and I hope to make it -- BUT, I think it is still 'good enough' that I do encourage you to investigate it now, definitely let me know what problems you have so I can know what needs improvement -- and/but if it ends up being too hard to get going, you should still check back later after I've found time to improve it. I am VERY interested/eager/excited to have other institutions use Umlaut -- especially institutions that are willing to occasionally get their hands dirty debugging and submitting patches, as Scot at NYU has been awesome at -- so am happy to try to help you get going as my time allows, do feel free to ask any questions you have. ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:32 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Currently we are not using it. I have received several requests to investigate as an option for us but we are still in the early stages. -----Original Message----- From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:22 AM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Good afternoon all, Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? --Dale --------------------------------------- Dale Poulter Automation Coordinator Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 Nashville, TN 37203-2427 (615)343-5388 (615)343-8834 (fax) (615)207-9705 (cell) dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general From jronallo at gmail.com Fri Dec 31 13:44:51 2010 From: jronallo at gmail.com (Jason Ronallo) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A15@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C547@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C549@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A15@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Message-ID: He may mean trunk since it is svn: http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/ This is where switching between svn (trunk) and git (master) becomes a problem with different terminology. Jason On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Poulter, Dale wrote: > Master does not seem to be available. ?I have tried the following: > > [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/tags/master ./Umlaut > svn: Target path '/branches/tags/master' does not exist > [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/master ./Umlaut > svn: Target path '/branches/master' does not exist > [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/master ./Umlaut > svn: Target path '/master' does not exist > > -----Original Message----- > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:21 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Oh, and you can use "svn switch" to switch your checkout to 'master' instead of the 2.10.0 in place. ?But once you've svn check out 2.10.0 tag, unless you do a switch, future 'svn up's won't get you a new version, you've locked to 2.10.0. > > I'm starting to forget the idiosyncracies of svn, prefering the idiosyncracies of git instead these days, heh. > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind [rochkind at jhu.edu] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:44 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > You know what, I'm pretty sure the problem is that I never tagged a new version with the SFX4 functionality -- please do a checkout of current 'master' rather than the tagged 2.10.0, which I believe is old. ?The SFX4 functionality hasn't actually been deployed in production yet here where i work (we haven't switched our SFX4 to production), so I was waiting to do that before tagging a new release, making sure I was eating my own dogfood before suggesting it for others. > > I've also perhaps been a bit sloppy with Umlaut release management, because the very small number of institutions currently using Umlaut seemed not to absolutely require it, and, you know, time and lazy. > > I do have some plans for making Umlaut quite a lot easier to install and maintain, that involve moving Umlaut to a Rails3 engine-as-gem instead of an independent rails application, as well as moving the Umlaut code to github. ?I have talked to my supervisor who has generally agreed that this would be a good use of my time -- but got to meet some milestones for our Blacklight project before I can attend to it. ?I just put this in to try and provide some evidence that Umlaut is definitely not a moribund project; that I think it's not as easy to install as it could be and I hope to make it -- BUT, I think it is still 'good enough' that I do encourage you to investigate it now, definitely let me know what problems you have so I can know what needs improvement -- and/but if it ends up being too hard to get going, you should still check back later after I've found time to improve it. > > I am VERY interested/eager/excited to have other institutions use Umlaut -- especially institutions that are willing to occasionally get their hands dirty debugging and submitting patches, as Scot at NYU has been awesome at -- so am happy to try to help you get going as my time allows, do feel free to ask any questions you have. > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, ? Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:32 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Currently we are not using it. ?I have received several requests to investigate as an option for us but we are still in the early stages. > > -----Original Message----- > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:22 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? ?You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? > > I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! > > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, ? Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Good afternoon all, > > Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? > > --Dale > > --------------------------------------- > Dale Poulter > Automation Coordinator > Library Information Technology Services > Vanderbilt University > 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 > Nashville, TN ?37203-2427 > (615)343-5388 > (615)343-8834 (fax) > (615)207-9705 (cell) > dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu > > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > From rochkind at jhu.edu Fri Dec 31 18:19:32 2010 From: rochkind at jhu.edu (Jonathan Rochkind) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C547@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C549@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A15@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu>, Message-ID: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C54B@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> Yes, I think what you want is: http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jason Ronallo [jronallo at gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 1:44 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 He may mean trunk since it is svn: http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/ This is where switching between svn (trunk) and git (master) becomes a problem with different terminology. Jason On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Poulter, Dale wrote: > Master does not seem to be available. I have tried the following: > > [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/tags/master ./Umlaut > svn: Target path '/branches/tags/master' does not exist > [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/master ./Umlaut > svn: Target path '/branches/master' does not exist > [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/master ./Umlaut > svn: Target path '/master' does not exist > > -----Original Message----- > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:21 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Oh, and you can use "svn switch" to switch your checkout to 'master' instead of the 2.10.0 in place. But once you've svn check out 2.10.0 tag, unless you do a switch, future 'svn up's won't get you a new version, you've locked to 2.10.0. > > I'm starting to forget the idiosyncracies of svn, prefering the idiosyncracies of git instead these days, heh. > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind [rochkind at jhu.edu] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:44 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > You know what, I'm pretty sure the problem is that I never tagged a new version with the SFX4 functionality -- please do a checkout of current 'master' rather than the tagged 2.10.0, which I believe is old. The SFX4 functionality hasn't actually been deployed in production yet here where i work (we haven't switched our SFX4 to production), so I was waiting to do that before tagging a new release, making sure I was eating my own dogfood before suggesting it for others. > > I've also perhaps been a bit sloppy with Umlaut release management, because the very small number of institutions currently using Umlaut seemed not to absolutely require it, and, you know, time and lazy. > > I do have some plans for making Umlaut quite a lot easier to install and maintain, that involve moving Umlaut to a Rails3 engine-as-gem instead of an independent rails application, as well as moving the Umlaut code to github. I have talked to my supervisor who has generally agreed that this would be a good use of my time -- but got to meet some milestones for our Blacklight project before I can attend to it. I just put this in to try and provide some evidence that Umlaut is definitely not a moribund project; that I think it's not as easy to install as it could be and I hope to make it -- BUT, I think it is still 'good enough' that I do encourage you to investigate it now, definitely let me know what problems you have so I can know what needs improvement -- and/but if it ends up being too hard to get going, you should still check back later after I've found time to improve it. > > I am VERY interested/eager/excited to have other institutions use Umlaut -- especially institutions that are willing to occasionally get their hands dirty debugging and submitting patches, as Scot at NYU has been awesome at -- so am happy to try to help you get going as my time allows, do feel free to ask any questions you have. > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:32 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Currently we are not using it. I have received several requests to investigate as an option for us but we are still in the early stages. > > -----Original Message----- > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:22 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? > > I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! > > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Good afternoon all, > > Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? > > --Dale > > --------------------------------------- > Dale Poulter > Automation Coordinator > Library Information Technology Services > Vanderbilt University > 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 > Nashville, TN 37203-2427 > (615)343-5388 > (615)343-8834 (fax) > (615)207-9705 (cell) > dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu > > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general From dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu Fri Dec 31 20:35:04 2010 From: dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu (Poulter, Dale) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:35:04 -0600 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C54B@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C547@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C549@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A15@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu>, <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C54B@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> Message-ID: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A36@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Thanks. It appears that a file is missing. I did a fresh checkout from the trunk but it resulted in the below; [root at libdig10 Umlaut]# ./script/generate umlaut_local /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require': no such file to load -- nokogiri (MissingSourceFile) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' from /apps/Umlaut/app/controllers/search_methods/sfx4.rb:1 from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:102:in `require_or_load' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:261:in `load_missing_constant' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:468:in `const_missing' from /apps/Umlaut/config/initializers/umlaut/search_logic.rb:6 from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:484:in `load_application_initializers' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:483:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:483:in `load_application_initializers' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:149:in `process' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:97:in `send' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:97:in `run' from /apps/Umlaut/config/environment.rb:26 from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/commands/generate.rb:1 from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from ./script/generate:3 -----Original Message----- From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 5:20 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Yes, I think what you want is: http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk ________________________________________ From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jason Ronallo [jronallo at gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 1:44 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 He may mean trunk since it is svn: http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/ This is where switching between svn (trunk) and git (master) becomes a problem with different terminology. Jason On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Poulter, Dale wrote: > Master does not seem to be available. I have tried the following: > > [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch > http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/tags/master ./Umlaut > svn: Target path '/branches/tags/master' does not exist > [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch > http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/master ./Umlaut > svn: Target path '/branches/master' does not exist > [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch > http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/master ./Umlaut > svn: Target path '/master' does not exist > > -----Original Message----- > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan > Rochkind > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:21 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Oh, and you can use "svn switch" to switch your checkout to 'master' instead of the 2.10.0 in place. But once you've svn check out 2.10.0 tag, unless you do a switch, future 'svn up's won't get you a new version, you've locked to 2.10.0. > > I'm starting to forget the idiosyncracies of svn, prefering the idiosyncracies of git instead these days, heh. > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind > [rochkind at jhu.edu] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:44 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > You know what, I'm pretty sure the problem is that I never tagged a new version with the SFX4 functionality -- please do a checkout of current 'master' rather than the tagged 2.10.0, which I believe is old. The SFX4 functionality hasn't actually been deployed in production yet here where i work (we haven't switched our SFX4 to production), so I was waiting to do that before tagging a new release, making sure I was eating my own dogfood before suggesting it for others. > > I've also perhaps been a bit sloppy with Umlaut release management, because the very small number of institutions currently using Umlaut seemed not to absolutely require it, and, you know, time and lazy. > > I do have some plans for making Umlaut quite a lot easier to install and maintain, that involve moving Umlaut to a Rails3 engine-as-gem instead of an independent rails application, as well as moving the Umlaut code to github. I have talked to my supervisor who has generally agreed that this would be a good use of my time -- but got to meet some milestones for our Blacklight project before I can attend to it. I just put this in to try and provide some evidence that Umlaut is definitely not a moribund project; that I think it's not as easy to install as it could be and I hope to make it -- BUT, I think it is still 'good enough' that I do encourage you to investigate it now, definitely let me know what problems you have so I can know what needs improvement -- and/but if it ends up being too hard to get going, you should still check back later after I've found time to improve it. > > I am VERY interested/eager/excited to have other institutions use Umlaut -- especially institutions that are willing to occasionally get their hands dirty debugging and submitting patches, as Scot at NYU has been awesome at -- so am happy to try to help you get going as my time allows, do feel free to ask any questions you have. > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:32 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Currently we are not using it. I have received several requests to investigate as an option for us but we are still in the early stages. > > -----Original Message----- > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan > Rochkind > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:22 AM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? > > I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! > > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Good afternoon all, > > Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? > > --Dale > > --------------------------------------- > Dale Poulter > Automation Coordinator > Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University > 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 > Nashville, TN 37203-2427 > (615)343-5388 > (615)343-8834 (fax) > (615)207-9705 (cell) > dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu > > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general From rossfsinger at gmail.com Fri Dec 31 21:36:42 2010 From: rossfsinger at gmail.com (Ross Singer) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A36@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C547@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C549@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A15@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C54B@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A36@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Message-ID: Dale, sudo gem install nokogiri Not actually a missing file, but a missing dependency. Depending your your OS, you might need to install libxml2/libxslt development packages. -Ross. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Poulter, Dale wrote: > Thanks. ?It appears that a file is missing. ?I did a fresh checkout from the trunk but it resulted in the below; > > > [root at libdig10 Umlaut]# ./script/generate umlaut_local > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require': no such file to load -- nokogiri (MissingSourceFile) > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' > ? ? ? ?from /apps/Umlaut/app/controllers/search_methods/sfx4.rb:1 > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:102:in `require_or_load' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:261:in `load_missing_constant' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:468:in `const_missing' > ? ? ? ?from /apps/Umlaut/config/initializers/umlaut/search_logic.rb:6 > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:484:in `load_application_initializers' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:483:in `each' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:483:in `load_application_initializers' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:149:in `process' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:97:in `send' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:97:in `run' > ? ? ? ?from /apps/Umlaut/config/environment.rb:26 > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/commands/generate.rb:1 > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' > ? ? ? ?from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' > ? ? ? ?from ./script/generate:3 > > -----Original Message----- > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 5:20 PM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Yes, I think what you want is: > > http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk > > > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jason Ronallo [jronallo at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 1:44 PM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > He may mean trunk since it is svn: http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/ > > This is where switching between svn (trunk) and git (master) becomes a problem with different terminology. > > Jason > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Poulter, ? Dale > wrote: >> Master does not seem to be available. ?I have tried the following: >> >> [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch >> http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/tags/master ./Umlaut >> svn: Target path '/branches/tags/master' does not exist >> [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch >> http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/master ./Umlaut >> svn: Target path '/branches/master' does not exist >> [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch >> http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/master ./Umlaut >> svn: Target path '/master' does not exist >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org >> [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan >> Rochkind >> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:21 AM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> Oh, and you can use "svn switch" to switch your checkout to 'master' instead of the 2.10.0 in place. ?But once you've svn check out 2.10.0 tag, unless you do a switch, future 'svn up's won't get you a new version, you've locked to 2.10.0. >> >> I'm starting to forget the idiosyncracies of svn, prefering the idiosyncracies of git instead these days, heh. >> ________________________________________ >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org >> [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind >> [rochkind at jhu.edu] >> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:44 AM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> You know what, I'm pretty sure the problem is that I never tagged a new version with the SFX4 functionality -- please do a checkout of current 'master' rather than the tagged 2.10.0, which I believe is old. ?The SFX4 functionality hasn't actually been deployed in production yet here where i work (we haven't switched our SFX4 to production), so I was waiting to do that before tagging a new release, making sure I was eating my own dogfood before suggesting it for others. >> >> I've also perhaps been a bit sloppy with Umlaut release management, because the very small number of institutions currently using Umlaut seemed not to absolutely require it, and, you know, time and lazy. >> >> I do have some plans for making Umlaut quite a lot easier to install and maintain, that involve moving Umlaut to a Rails3 engine-as-gem instead of an independent rails application, as well as moving the Umlaut code to github. ?I have talked to my supervisor who has generally agreed that this would be a good use of my time -- but got to meet some milestones for our Blacklight project before I can attend to it. ?I just put this in to try and provide some evidence that Umlaut is definitely not a moribund project; that I think it's not as easy to install as it could be and I hope to make it -- BUT, I think it is still 'good enough' that I do encourage you to investigate it now, definitely let me know what problems you have so I can know what needs improvement -- and/but if it ends up being too hard to get going, you should still check back later after I've found time to improve it. >> >> I am VERY interested/eager/excited to have other institutions use Umlaut -- especially institutions that are willing to occasionally get their hands dirty debugging and submitting patches, as Scot at NYU has been awesome at -- so am happy to try to help you get going as my time allows, do feel free to ask any questions you have. >> ________________________________________ >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, ? Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] >> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:32 AM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> Currently we are not using it. ?I have received several requests to investigate as an option for us but we are still in the early stages. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org >> [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan >> Rochkind >> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:22 AM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? ?You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? >> >> I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, ? Dale [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] >> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> Good afternoon all, >> >> Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? >> >> --Dale >> >> --------------------------------------- >> Dale Poulter >> Automation Coordinator >> Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University >> 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 >> Nashville, TN ?37203-2427 >> (615)343-5388 >> (615)343-8834 (fax) >> (615)207-9705 (cell) >> dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > From dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu Fri Dec 31 22:23:27 2010 From: dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu (Poulter, Dale) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:23:27 -0600 Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 In-Reply-To: References: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168998@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C545@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A02@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C547@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C549@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A15@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> <864A73846CE8F04D995603351682C29C9AC556C54B@JHEMTEXVS2.win.ad.jhu.edu> <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A36@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Message-ID: <7288D49C0448E840B752320350AFA94E42168A37@ITS-HCWNEM03.ds.Vanderbilt.edu> Ross, Thanks! That corrected the issue with the initial install. Once I got everything restarted I ended up with the error below. I think I may give it a rest for the night and try again in the morning. Thanks again to everyone for the help! [31 Dec 21:18:46] (pid:13862) FATAL: /!\ FAILSAFE /!\ Fri Dec 31 21:18:46 -0600 2010 Status: 500 Internal Server Error wrong argument type String (expected Module) /apps/Umlaut/app/controllers/search_controller.rb:42:in `extend' /apps/Umlaut/app/controllers/search_controller.rb:42:in `initialize' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.2/lib/action_controller/base.rb:389:in `new' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.2/lib/action_controller/base.rb:389:in `process' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.2/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:149:in `handle_request' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.2/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:107:in `dispatch' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.2/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:104:in `synchronize' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.2/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:104:in `dispatch' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.2/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:120:in `dispatch_cgi' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.2/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:35:in `dispatch' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/rails.rb:76:in `process' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/rails.rb:74:in `synchronize' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/rails.rb:74:in `process' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:159:in `process_client' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:158:in `each' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:158:in `process_client' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `run' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `initialize' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `new' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `run' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:268:in `initialize' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:268:in `new' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel.rb:268:in `run' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel/configurator.rb:282:in `run' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel/configurator.rb:281:in `each' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel/configurator.rb:281:in `run' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/mongrel_rails:128:in `run' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib/mongrel/command.rb:212:in `run' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/mongrel_rails:281 /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/commands/servers/mongrel.rb:64 /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/commands/server.rb:39 /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' ./script/server:3 -----Original Message----- From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ross Singer Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 8:37 PM To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 Dale, sudo gem install nokogiri Not actually a missing file, but a missing dependency. Depending your your OS, you might need to install libxml2/libxslt development packages. -Ross. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Poulter, Dale wrote: > Thanks. It appears that a file is missing. I did a fresh checkout > from the trunk but it resulted in the below; > > > [root at libdig10 Umlaut]# ./script/generate umlaut_local > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in > `gem_original_require': no such file to load -- nokogiri > (MissingSourceFile) > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' > from /apps/Umlaut/app/controllers/search_methods/sfx4.rb:1 > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:510:in `require' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:102:in `require_or_load' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:261:in `load_missing_constant' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:468:in `const_missing' > from /apps/Umlaut/config/initializers/umlaut/search_logic.rb:6 > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:355:in `new_constants_in' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:503:in `load' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:484:in `load_application_initializers' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:483:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:483:in `load_application_initializers' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:149:in `process' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:97:in `send' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/initializer.rb:97:in `run' > from /apps/Umlaut/config/environment.rb:26 > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' > from > /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.1.2/lib/commands/generate.rb > :1 > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' > from ./script/generate:3 > > -----Original Message----- > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan > Rochkind > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 5:20 PM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > Yes, I think what you want is: > > http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk > > > ________________________________________ > From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org > [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jason Ronallo > [jronallo at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 1:44 PM > To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 > > He may mean trunk since it is svn: http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/ > > This is where switching between svn (trunk) and git (master) becomes a problem with different terminology. > > Jason > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Poulter, Dale > wrote: >> Master does not seem to be available. I have tried the following: >> >> [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch >> http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/tags/master ./Umlaut >> svn: Target path '/branches/tags/master' does not exist >> [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch >> http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/branches/master ./Umlaut >> svn: Target path '/branches/master' does not exist >> [root at libdig10 apps]# svn switch >> http://umlaut.rubyforge.org/svn/master ./Umlaut >> svn: Target path '/master' does not exist >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org >> [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan >> Rochkind >> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:21 AM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> Oh, and you can use "svn switch" to switch your checkout to 'master' instead of the 2.10.0 in place. But once you've svn check out 2.10.0 tag, unless you do a switch, future 'svn up's won't get you a new version, you've locked to 2.10.0. >> >> I'm starting to forget the idiosyncracies of svn, prefering the idiosyncracies of git instead these days, heh. >> ________________________________________ >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org >> [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind >> [rochkind at jhu.edu] >> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:44 AM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> You know what, I'm pretty sure the problem is that I never tagged a new version with the SFX4 functionality -- please do a checkout of current 'master' rather than the tagged 2.10.0, which I believe is old. The SFX4 functionality hasn't actually been deployed in production yet here where i work (we haven't switched our SFX4 to production), so I was waiting to do that before tagging a new release, making sure I was eating my own dogfood before suggesting it for others. >> >> I've also perhaps been a bit sloppy with Umlaut release management, because the very small number of institutions currently using Umlaut seemed not to absolutely require it, and, you know, time and lazy. >> >> I do have some plans for making Umlaut quite a lot easier to install and maintain, that involve moving Umlaut to a Rails3 engine-as-gem instead of an independent rails application, as well as moving the Umlaut code to github. I have talked to my supervisor who has generally agreed that this would be a good use of my time -- but got to meet some milestones for our Blacklight project before I can attend to it. I just put this in to try and provide some evidence that Umlaut is definitely not a moribund project; that I think it's not as easy to install as it could be and I hope to make it -- BUT, I think it is still 'good enough' that I do encourage you to investigate it now, definitely let me know what problems you have so I can know what needs improvement -- and/but if it ends up being too hard to get going, you should still check back later after I've found time to improve it. >> >> I am VERY interested/eager/excited to have other institutions use Umlaut -- especially institutions that are willing to occasionally get their hands dirty debugging and submitting patches, as Scot at NYU has been awesome at -- so am happy to try to help you get going as my time allows, do feel free to ask any questions you have. >> ________________________________________ >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org >> [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale >> [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] >> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:32 AM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> Currently we are not using it. I have received several requests to investigate as an option for us but we are still in the early stages. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org >> [mailto:umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan >> Rochkind >> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 10:22 AM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: Re: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> Also, Dale, you guys aren't already using Umlaut at Vanderbilt, are you? You're just evaluating it for use and/or experimenting with it? >> >> I at present only know of a small handfull of institutions using Umlaut, so if there were others using it unbeknownst to me, that would be a pleasant surprise! >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org >> [umlaut-general-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Poulter, Dale >> [dale.poulter at Vanderbilt.Edu] >> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:47 PM >> To: umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> Subject: [Umlaut-general] Umlaut and SFX v4 >> >> Good afternoon all, >> >> Are there plans to make umlaut work with SFX v4? >> >> --Dale >> >> --------------------------------------- >> Dale Poulter >> Automation Coordinator >> Library Information Technology Services Vanderbilt University >> 419 21st Avenue South, Room 812 >> Nashville, TN 37203-2427 >> (615)343-5388 >> (615)343-8834 (fax) >> (615)207-9705 (cell) >> dale.poulter at vanderbilt.edu >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> _______________________________________________ >> Umlaut-general mailing list >> Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general >> > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ > Umlaut-general mailing list > Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general > _______________________________________________ Umlaut-general mailing list Umlaut-general at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/umlaut-general