[typo] 1.1 or 1.0, choose now!

Steve Longdo steve.longdo at gmail.com
Thu Mar 30 01:16:52 EST 2006

+1 for 1.1 :-)

On 3/30/06, Piers Cawley <pdcawley at bofh.org.uk> wrote:
> After further testing of the rails_1_1 branch, it seems I was rather
> to sanguine about how well it works with Rails 1.0. Essentially, it
> doesn't, I don't know why, and working out why is going to be HARD.
> So, we're faced with a choice: we can move the typo trunk to a point
> where we *require* Rails 1.1, or we can wait until we come up with a
> fix for 1.0.
> My gut feeling (especially given the speed with which the hosting
> companies have made the switch to 1.1) is that we should just move
> over to requiring 1.1 as soon as possible; there's lots of goodies in
> there that I want to use for typo; we'd probably be going to 1.1 only
> pretty swiftly any way.
> If we do this, we'd tag revision 971 (the current trunk HEAD) as
> 'good_with_1_0' or something and just move on.
> What does the panel think?
> --
> Piers Cawley <pdcawley at bofh.org.uk>
> http://www.bofh.org.uk/
> _______________________________________________
> Typo-list mailing list
> Typo-list at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/typo-list/attachments/20060330/a5ecab6b/attachment.htm 

More information about the Typo-list mailing list