[typo] has_many through

Piers Cawley pdcawley at bofh.org.uk
Fri Aug 11 16:39:23 EDT 2006


"Scott Laird" <scott at sigkill.org> writes:

> We haven't looked at it yet.  It's not a high priority, because the
> current code works well enough, and I don't really expect to see habtm
> disappear in the near future, no matter how little the Rails core
> likes it.

It is one of those things I'm thinking of, not particularly vigorously
yet, but it's definitely on my todo eventually list.

> Is there actually an advantage to converting existing code?

Cleanliness.

-- 
Piers Cawley <pdcawley at bofh.org.uk>
http://www.bofh.org.uk/


More information about the Typo-list mailing list