[typo] has_many through
pdcawley at bofh.org.uk
Fri Aug 11 16:39:23 EDT 2006
"Scott Laird" <scott at sigkill.org> writes:
> We haven't looked at it yet. It's not a high priority, because the
> current code works well enough, and I don't really expect to see habtm
> disappear in the near future, no matter how little the Rails core
> likes it.
It is one of those things I'm thinking of, not particularly vigorously
yet, but it's definitely on my todo eventually list.
> Is there actually an advantage to converting existing code?
Piers Cawley <pdcawley at bofh.org.uk>
More information about the Typo-list