[typo] Typo's memory footprint

Scott Laird scott at sigkill.org
Mon Aug 7 11:28:09 EDT 2006


Thanks.  Memory leak debugging with Rails is difficult.
Unfortunately, slower leaks are even harder to find and harder to
verify as fixed, but we'll find it and fix it.


Scott

On 8/7/06, Steve Longdo <steve.longdo at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've done a quick write up about this on my blog.  I've also been doing some
> preliminary memory profiling.  I'll be writing more about that soon.
>
> http://www.stevelongdo.com/articles/2006/08/04/typo-4-0-and-memory-reduction
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> -Steve
> http://www.stevelongdo.com
>
> On 8/7/06, mathew <meta at pobox.com> wrote:
> > Paul Barry wrote:
> > > Almost a week later here's what the memory usage looks like:
> > >
> > > root      3395  0.1 58.0  76412 54980 ?        S    Aug02  14:07
> > > /usr/bin/ruby /usr/bin/mongrel_rails start
> > >
> > > So no one else is having problems with this?  I gonna have to put in a
> > > cron job to restart this weekly, since it's obviously leaking memory.
> >
> > One of my dispatch.cgis has gone up to 58128 70392, the other has gone
> > down to 49308 61572. I think the one that's elevated is because I'm
> > logged in to tracks, however.
> >
> > I don't use Mongrel, maybe that's the difference?
> >
> >
> > mathew
> > _______________________________________________
> > Typo-list mailing list
> > Typo-list at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Typo-list mailing list
> Typo-list at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
>
>


More information about the Typo-list mailing list