[typo] Abstemious Cache Sweeping

Mike Purvis mike at uwmike.com
Mon Dec 5 14:20:09 EST 2005

Justus Pendleton wrote:

>Or you could use frames which aren't server specific and work on almost
>every browser.  Moving the sidebar to a separate frame would probably
>make it easier to implement separate cache policies for the sidebar vs.
>the main content area.
I'm much more comfortable with the idea of a server-include, myself. If 
we don't want to run Rails for simple includes, couldn't typo just even 
be changed to generate ".php" files instead of ".html"? Then they could 
simply include code like '<? include "/cache/sidebar.html"; ?>' in them.

I hate to be a downer, but I frequently browse with JS-off, and I know 
at least two people who access my site from BlackBerrys. Making key 
navigational/content entities depend on a javascript call is not exactly 
"progressive enhancement".


More information about the Typo-list mailing list