[TTK-Patches] [ruby_ex] 368: Update vcs support and add some fixtures.

[Nicolas Desprès]

On 9/26/05, Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/26/05, Nicolas Desprès <nicolas.despres at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/26/05, Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 9/25/05, Nicolas Desprès <nicolas.despres at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 9/24/05, Nicolas Pouillard <ertai at lrde.epita.fr> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > svn://svn.feydakins.org/ruby_ex/trunk
> > > > >
> > > > > Index: ChangeLog
> > > > > from  Nicolas Pouillard  <ertai at lrde.epita.fr>
> > > > >
> > > > >         Update vcs support and add some fixtures.
> > > > >
> > > > >         * test/check-ruby_ex.yml: Upgrade to Iterate and !S::.
> > > > >         * vcs/vcs_ruby_ex.rb: Upgarde to Vcs 0.4 protocol 0.1.
> > > > >         With just Vcs 0.4 just use `commit' or `ci'.
> > > > >         * NEWS: Typo.
> > > > >
> > > >

[...]

> >
> > Once again: try to patch uttk extension of vcs before updating vcs on
> > rubygem in order to avoid this kind of problem.
>
> Yes It's my bad. I know that. It was for testing this version of vcs.
> I need to make some patches before release it.
>
> > I think it is not a
> > big deal to do that in the right order.
>
> Yes but it's not a big deal to type \svn up -r710 too.

For me it is not, but I'm thinking about the other whiche are not
close to you and this ML.

>
> > I think vcs deserves a better
> > test suite
>
> Perhaps you want to write it ...

Yes, I will !

>
> > and I really think that uttk must be able to provide such a
> > test suite strategy: we just need to write it and to mock the right
> > dependent component.
>
> Yes but it's many work that I can't spend right now.

I really wish that uttk can test vcs ! That's one of the major uttk's
test. Specially to prove that uttk is able to mock system interactions
easily ! Maybe vcs deserve a -zen option as Akim advises me. But this
advise is relevant while vcs is using binary interface instead of API
interface. I had a look at RSCM, and I have unfortunately understood
that is only handling binary interface of SCM software. Maybe, I'm
wrong but I trust more API interface than binary interface. Anyway, I
wish once RSCM will handle API instead of binary and so VCS could use
RSCM.

>
> Vcs is not buggy it's just not yet released.

I understand, and it is exactly the point I reproache to you to
haven't been able to patch ttk's vcs extension after vcs is updated on
rubygem. I know that vcs is working well on your *peronal version*.
But it's not a big deal since we're, by now, a few to develop uttk. I
hope nobody in our lab have such disappointement ; but I think they
don't. Really, it's not a big deal, but please don't do that later,
when their will have more than you and me as uttk developers and so
vcs users.

Cheers,

--
Nicolas Desprès
_______________________________________________
TTK-Patches mailing list
TTK-Patches at lists.feydakins.org
http://mailman.feydakins.org/mailman/listinfo/ttk-patches