From djberg96 at gmail.com  Mon Nov  2 07:33:52 2009
From: djberg96 at gmail.com (Daniel Berger)
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:33:52 -0700
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00009] Question on console runner
Message-ID: <4AEED1B0.4020304@gmail.com>

Hi,

In the Ruby distro (1.8.6-p368) there's a file called runner.rb. It 
looks like this:

# runner.rb
require 'test/unit'

rcsid = %w$Id: runner.rb 11708 2007-02-12 23:01:19Z shyouhei $
Version = rcsid[2].scan(/\d+/).collect!(&method(:Integer)).freeze
Release = rcsid[3].freeze

exit Test::Unit::AutoRunner.run(true, File.dirname($0))

In the common.mk task I've setup a custom target like so:

TESTSDIR_ARRAY = $(srcdir)/test/core/Array

test-array:
	$(RUNRUBY) "$(srcdir)/test/runner.rb" --basedir="$(TESTSDIR_ARRAY)" 
--runner=$(TESTUI) $(TESTS)

And I've created some custom array test cases under the test/core/Array 
directory.

However, when I try to replace the old test-unit code with the test-unit 
2.x code I just get this:

./miniruby  ./runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- "./test/runner.rb" 
--basedir="./test/core/Array" --runner=console
make: *** [test-array] Error 1

It doesn't seem to actually run. What am I missing?

I tried to view the documentation for Test::Unit::AutoRunner.run, but 
there doesn't seem to be any. Any chance you could update that?

Regards,

Dan

From kou at cozmixng.org  Mon Nov  2 20:00:04 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:00:04 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00010] Re: Question on console runner
In-Reply-To: <4AEED1B0.4020304@gmail.com>
References: <4AEED1B0.4020304@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20091103.100004.938753265531810164.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <4AEED1B0.4020304 at gmail.com>
  "[test-unit-users-en:00009] Question on console runner" on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:33:52 -0700,
  Daniel Berger <djberg96 at gmail.com> wrote:

> In the Ruby distro (1.8.6-p368) there's a file called
> runner.rb. It looks like this:
> 
> # runner.rb
> require 'test/unit'
> 
> rcsid = %w$Id: runner.rb 11708 2007-02-12 23:01:19Z shyouhei
> $
> Version =
> rcsid[2].scan(/\d+/).collect!(&method(:Integer)).freeze
> Release = rcsid[3].freeze
> 
> exit Test::Unit::AutoRunner.run(true, File.dirname($0))
> 
> In the common.mk task I've setup a custom target like so:
> 
> TESTSDIR_ARRAY = $(srcdir)/test/core/Array
> 
> test-array:
> 	$(RUNRUBY) "$(srcdir)/test/runner.rb"
> 	--basedir="$(TESTSDIR_ARRAY)" --runner=$(TESTUI) $(TESTS)
> 
> And I've created some custom array test cases under the
> test/core/Array directory.
> 
> However, when I try to replace the old test-unit code with
> the test-unit 2.x code I just get this:
> 
> ./miniruby ./runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- "./test/runner.rb"
> --basedir="./test/core/Array" --runner=console
> make: *** [test-array] Error 1
> 
> It doesn't seem to actually run. What am I missing?

This was a bug of test-unit 2.x...
I've fixed this in trunk.

> I tried to view the documentation for
> Test::Unit::AutoRunner.run, but there doesn't seem to be
> any. Any chance you could update that?

I will update that... but it's not high priority... Sorry...
A patch is welcome! :)


Thanks,
--
kou

From andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com  Sat Nov  7 22:28:15 2009
From: andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com (Andrew Grimm)
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:28:15 +1100
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00011] Documentation for run methods
Message-ID: <b9140daa0911071928n7725433p50e47e9aa86a97a0@mail.gmail.com>

In Test::Unit, the documentation for Test::Unit.run= says "# If set to
false Test::Unit will not automatically run at exit.", and for run?
says "# Automatically run tests at exit?"

However, I'm finding that if I set

Test::Unit.run = false

then the unit test is automatically run at exit, whereas if I set

Test::Unit.run = true

then the unit test is not automatically run. Both scenarios can be
seen at http://gist.github.com/229074

This seems to be the opposite of what the documentation says. Have I
misunderstood the documentation?

Thanks,

Andrew

From kou at cozmixng.org  Sat Nov  7 22:41:23 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:41:23 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00012] Re: Documentation for run methods
In-Reply-To: <b9140daa0911071928n7725433p50e47e9aa86a97a0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b9140daa0911071928n7725433p50e47e9aa86a97a0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20091108.124123.133520280546678408.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <b9140daa0911071928n7725433p50e47e9aa86a97a0 at mail.gmail.com>
  "[test-unit-users-en:00011] Documentation for run methods" on Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:28:15 +1100,
  Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com> wrote:

> In Test::Unit, the documentation for Test::Unit.run= says "# If set to
> false Test::Unit will not automatically run at exit.", and for run?
> says "# Automatically run tests at exit?"
> 
> However, I'm finding that if I set
> 
> Test::Unit.run = false
> 
> then the unit test is automatically run at exit, whereas if I set
> 
> Test::Unit.run = true
> 
> then the unit test is not automatically run. Both scenarios can be
> seen at http://gist.github.com/229074
> 
> This seems to be the opposite of what the documentation says. Have I
> misunderstood the documentation?

Thanks for your report.
The documentation is wrong. I've fixed it in trunk.

Thanks,
--
kou

From andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com  Sat Nov  7 22:47:54 2009
From: andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com (Andrew Grimm)
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:47:54 +1100
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00013] Re: Documentation for run methods
In-Reply-To: <20091108.124123.133520280546678408.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <b9140daa0911071928n7725433p50e47e9aa86a97a0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091108.124123.133520280546678408.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <b9140daa0911071947y543f74c4m1112d8150317e5ef@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Kou,

Thanks for crediting me in the README.

The documentation for Test::Unit.run? also needs to be fixed.

Thanks,

Andrew

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Kouhei Sutou <kou at cozmixng.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In <b9140daa0911071928n7725433p50e47e9aa86a97a0 at mail.gmail.com>
> ?"[test-unit-users-en:00011] Documentation for run methods" on Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:28:15 +1100,
> ?Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In Test::Unit, the documentation for Test::Unit.run= says "# If set to
>> false Test::Unit will not automatically run at exit.", and for run?
>> says "# Automatically run tests at exit?"
>>
>> However, I'm finding that if I set
>>
>> Test::Unit.run = false
>>
>> then the unit test is automatically run at exit, whereas if I set
>>
>> Test::Unit.run = true
>>
>> then the unit test is not automatically run. Both scenarios can be
>> seen at http://gist.github.com/229074
>>
>> This seems to be the opposite of what the documentation says. Have I
>> misunderstood the documentation?
>
> Thanks for your report.
> The documentation is wrong. I've fixed it in trunk.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
> _______________________________________________
> test-unit-users-en mailing list
> test-unit-users-en at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/test-unit-users-en
>

From kou at cozmixng.org  Sat Nov  7 23:14:14 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:14:14 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00014] Re: Documentation for run methods
In-Reply-To: <b9140daa0911071947y543f74c4m1112d8150317e5ef@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b9140daa0911071928n7725433p50e47e9aa86a97a0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091108.124123.133520280546678408.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<b9140daa0911071947y543f74c4m1112d8150317e5ef@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20091108.131414.492256604818688752.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <b9140daa0911071947y543f74c4m1112d8150317e5ef at mail.gmail.com>
  "[test-unit-users-en:00013] Re: Documentation for run methods" on Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:47:54 +1100,
  Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for crediting me in the README.

You're welcome. :-)

> The documentation for Test::Unit.run? also needs to be fixed.

Oops. I've also fixed it.

Thanks,
--
kou

From andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com  Sat Nov  7 23:52:07 2009
From: andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com (Andrew Grimm)
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:52:07 +1100
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00015] Re: Documentation for run methods
In-Reply-To: <20091108.131414.492256604818688752.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <b9140daa0911071928n7725433p50e47e9aa86a97a0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091108.124123.133520280546678408.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<b9140daa0911071947y543f74c4m1112d8150317e5ef@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091108.131414.492256604818688752.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <b9140daa0911072052y2b34fa51gd618aeec035654c8@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Kou,

"are run automatically" (or "will be run automatically") is better
grammar than "are ran automatically".

I'm not sure how to rephrase "Do tests run by hand?" to improve its grammar.

Andrew

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kouhei Sutou <kou at cozmixng.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In <b9140daa0911071947y543f74c4m1112d8150317e5ef at mail.gmail.com>
> ?"[test-unit-users-en:00013] Re: Documentation for run methods" on Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:47:54 +1100,
> ?Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for crediting me in the README.
>
> You're welcome. :-)
>
>> The documentation for Test::Unit.run? also needs to be fixed.
>
> Oops. I've also fixed it.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
> _______________________________________________
> test-unit-users-en mailing list
> test-unit-users-en at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/test-unit-users-en
>

From kou at cozmixng.org  Sun Nov  8 00:31:48 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:31:48 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00016] Re: Documentation for run methods
In-Reply-To: <b9140daa0911072052y2b34fa51gd618aeec035654c8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b9140daa0911071947y543f74c4m1112d8150317e5ef@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091108.131414.492256604818688752.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<b9140daa0911072052y2b34fa51gd618aeec035654c8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20091108.143148.391299521764576857.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <b9140daa0911072052y2b34fa51gd618aeec035654c8 at mail.gmail.com>
  "[test-unit-users-en:00015] Re: Documentation for run methods" on Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:52:07 +1100,
  Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com> wrote:

> "are run automatically" (or "will be run automatically") is better
> grammar than "are ran automatically".

Thanks! I'm not good at English...

> I'm not sure how to rephrase "Do tests run by hand?" to improve its grammar.

Could you provide correct English documentation for
Test::Unit.run?? I will replace the current documentation
with your suggested documentation. (You doesn't need to
reuse my broken documentation.)


Thanks,
--
kou

From andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com  Sun Nov  8 01:15:20 2009
From: andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com (Andrew Grimm)
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:15:20 +1100
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00017] Re: Documentation for run methods
In-Reply-To: <20091108.143148.391299521764576857.kou@cozmixng.org>
References: <b9140daa0911071947y543f74c4m1112d8150317e5ef@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091108.131414.492256604818688752.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<b9140daa0911072052y2b34fa51gd618aeec035654c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091108.143148.391299521764576857.kou@cozmixng.org>
Message-ID: <b9140daa0911072215l3b4c10fbt759936bbfc83e054@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Kou,

It turns out that the documentation has already been changed for ruby
1.8. http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/branches/ruby_1_8/lib/test/unit.rb?r1=24621&r2=24620&pathrev=24621

Here's a slightly re-worded version of what they have.

#Set +true+ to indicate that Test::Unit has been run.
#If set to +true+, Test::Unit will not automatically run at exit
def self.run=(flag)

#Tests have already been run?
def self.run?

Andrew

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Kouhei Sutou <kou at cozmixng.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In <b9140daa0911072052y2b34fa51gd618aeec035654c8 at mail.gmail.com>
> ?"[test-unit-users-en:00015] Re: Documentation for run methods" on Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:52:07 +1100,
> ?Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "are run automatically" (or "will be run automatically") is better
>> grammar than "are ran automatically".
>
> Thanks! I'm not good at English...
>
>> I'm not sure how to rephrase "Do tests run by hand?" to improve its grammar.
>
> Could you provide correct English documentation for
> Test::Unit.run?? I will replace the current documentation
> with your suggested documentation. (You doesn't need to
> reuse my broken documentation.)
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
> _______________________________________________
> test-unit-users-en mailing list
> test-unit-users-en at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/test-unit-users-en
>

From kou at cozmixng.org  Sun Nov  8 09:30:44 2009
From: kou at cozmixng.org (Kouhei Sutou)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:30:44 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [test-unit-users-en:00018] Re: Documentation for run methods
In-Reply-To: <b9140daa0911072215l3b4c10fbt759936bbfc83e054@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b9140daa0911072052y2b34fa51gd618aeec035654c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091108.143148.391299521764576857.kou@cozmixng.org>
	<b9140daa0911072215l3b4c10fbt759936bbfc83e054@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20091108.233044.242044444498133418.kou@cozmixng.org>

Hi,

In <b9140daa0911072215l3b4c10fbt759936bbfc83e054 at mail.gmail.com>
  "[test-unit-users-en:00017] Re: Documentation for run methods" on Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:15:20 +1100,
  Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm at gmail.com> wrote:

> It turns out that the documentation has already been changed for ruby
> 1.8. http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/branches/ruby_1_8/lib/test/unit.rb?r1=24621&r2=24620&pathrev=24621
> 
> Here's a slightly re-worded version of what they have.
> 
> #Set +true+ to indicate that Test::Unit has been run.
> #If set to +true+, Test::Unit will not automatically run at exit
> def self.run=(flag)
> 
> #Tests have already been run?
> def self.run?

Thanks for the information.
I've imported the changes.

Thanks,
--
kou