[sup-talk] Flat-view anyone ?

kingshivan at gmail.com kingshivan at gmail.com
Wed May 21 19:15:26 EDT 2008


I mentionned that idea a while back on that ml, but had no feedback, so,
here I go again.

How hard would that be to implement a flat view for thread, instead of
the tree view ? I agree that the tree makes more sense but I sometimes
miss the chronological order shown by gmail.

I read a bit through the code, and understood that thread are actually
stored as tree, would that make a flat view hard to provide ?

I'm not a ruby coder, but if it's easy to do, I'd be glad to provide a
patch (but it's always nice if I can get the work done by someone else
;-) ).

regards

-- 
Guillaume


More information about the sup-talk mailing list