[sup-talk] gpg signatures are not valid of sig present

[William Morgan]

Reformatted excerpts from Jan Spakula's message of 2008-05-15:
> I've just recently discovered that gpg signatures generated by sup are
> not verifiable (BAD signature result from gpg) on other e-mail clients
> (tried with mutt and claws-mail), when I have nonempty signature.

Turns out this was a newline issue. I think I've tracked it down. Do a
git pull and try again.
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>