[sup-talk] gpg signatures are not valid of sig present

[Jan Spakula]

Hello,

I've just recently discovered that gpg signatures generated by sup are
not verifiable (BAD signature result from gpg) on other e-mail clients
(tried with mutt and claws-mail), when I have nonempty signature. With
no signature present, all works fine. Sup can verify the signature
succesfully in either case though. (I'm using sup 0.5.)

I'm sorry, I'm no ruby programmer, so I don't know where the problem
could be; just by common sense it would seem that ruby strips the
message of the signature before dealing with gpg sig.

Thanks for help,

-- 
 Jan