[sup-talk] [PATCH] respond_to? needs include_private argument

[William Morgan]

Reformatted excerpts from Decklin Foster's message of 2008-06-18:
> I did some digging and it seems like when Array#flatten, in attempting
> to figure out if it can flatten some list element recursively, sends
> it :respond_to? with both arguments -- I didn't even know there was a
> second one (defaults to false; see docs). But this only happened recently
> or something.

That makes sense. Either the second argument, or the fact that
Array#flatten uses both arguments, is what's changed in 1.8.7.

I've merged the patch directly into master.

> Also: Hi everyone. I am the future Debian maintainer of sup.

Whoo!
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>