[sup-talk] new in svn: gpg signature verification

William Morgan wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net
Sat Sep 15 01:55:43 EDT 2007


Still highly experimental, but if you have gpg or pgp in your path, you
should now see a notice at the top of each signed message saying that
the signature was good, bad, or unknown. Please let me know how this
works, particularly if it claims a signature is bad when it actually
isn't. (Figuring out exactly how to format the signed payload such that
gpg/pgp accepts it has been non-trivial.)

-- 
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>


More information about the sup-talk mailing list