jeff at rosejn.net
Fri Mar 10 14:07:19 EST 2006
Very cool. Sorry for coming in out of the blue and sending in a patch
that mucked with just about everything, but I'm excited to get in on the
project and I'll try to behave in the future :-) The range voting that
I submitted is meant to have voters score all options in the same range,
but the other flavor you mentioned where they allot points out of a
finite pool makes sense also. Actually, I think that's the style that
we used for my Working Assets credit card...
So one thing that I was thinking of while looking through code is that
logging is probably pretty important, at least initially it might be
good to allow for logging of errors. (e.g. votes that don't pass the
verification phase...) This is another modification that gets into
everything though, so maybe we can use one scheme as a test case to
decide on how we want logging to work, and then once everyone is happy
we integrate in with the rest?
P.S. My rubyforge nick is "rosejn"
More information about the rubyvote-devel