[Rubytests-devel] Plans

[Simon Strandgaard]

On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 16:13, Chad Fowler wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2004, Simon Strandgaard wrote:
> # 
> # Now all tests passes ok (100% as you wished).
> # And there is no more pending bugs.
> # I don't know what to do now, any suggestions :-)
> # 
> # Does AllTests.rb pass ok on your machine(s)?
> 
> [chad at ns1 rubicon]$ uname -a
> Linux ns1.chadfowler.com 2.4.7-10 #1 Thu Sep 6 16:46:36 EDT 2001 i686 
> unknown
> 
> I have attached the results.  Haven't had any time to look at the failures 
> yet, though.  I ran it with 1.8 and with the current ruby cvs.  3 problems 
> in each, though it looks like they are different problems.

There isn't any file attached.  Try again ;-)

3 problems doesn't sound bad. I would be worried if all test passed ok,
without our interaction. 


> I'm going to work now on getting the web stuff imported into CVS.  I'd 
> like to completely rip out the rubicon xmarshal stuff in both the rubicon 
> distribution and the web code, clean up the post.rb hack, and then start 
> thinking about how this all might integrate into Ruby's "make test".

Good idea. I have added this as a Feature Request.

Last night I identified methods which needs to be tested. I compared the
C source against the testsuite. With these files (I hope I don't have
forgotten any methods):
builtin/ArrayBase.rb
fetch, insert, values_at, zip, transpose

builtin/HashBase.rb
default_proc, merge, merge!, values_at

builtin/StringBase.rb
casecmp, insert, lstrip, lstrip!, match, rstrip, rstrip!, to_sym

builtin/TestEnumerable.rb
all?, any?, inject, partition, sort_by, zip


There is 3 items on the TODO list:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=179&atid=754

--
Simon Strandgaard