luislavena at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 10:32:01 EDT 2009
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Charles
Roper<reachme at charlesroper.co.uk> wrote:
>> Personally I use Emacs since I have same functionalities on the
>> Windows and Linux and I know lot of developers would not choose it.
>> Nevertheless I don't think we should include SciTE in rubyinstaller.
> It might be a good idea to provide a list of good quality, Ruby-ready
> editors on the wiki that offer a great out of the box experience for new
> users. Things like:
Good idea, we can start the wiki page with your provided list:
> E Text Editor (Great Ruby support, Textmate bundles & snippets)
> Sublime Editor (Good Ruby support, Textmate snippets support, extensible
> with Python)
> TextShell (TextMate clone. Not very mature, but one to watch - doesn't
> default to Cygwin like E)
Never heard of it, looks very interesting, will give a whirl.
> InType (Good Ruby support, but a bit vapourware-ish?)
1.5 years in the making, heard of other products with longer cycles :P
> Notepad++ (Any good for Ruby?)
Is like SciTE in that matter.
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
More information about the Rubyinstaller-devel