[Rubygems-developers] gem lock
luislavena at gmail.com
Wed Sep 29 15:19:04 EDT 2010
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Trans <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> I recently noticed that `gem` had a `lock` command. I played around
> with it and found it mostly useless. First, one has to provide it the
> name and version of an installed gem. It would be much more useful if
> it could take a gemspec file instead. Also, it does not appear to
> utilize remote gem source(s) to resolve best dependencies, but simply
> uses the versions of gems installed locally. It would be much more
> useful if it recognized the --remote option and acted accordingly.
> Also, it could use an option to include/not-include development
I actually don't remember the last time I used that command and
discarded by ~> in my gem dependencies
Do we have a 1.4.x Roadmap? If not, this for sure can be removed then.
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
More information about the Rubygems-developers