[Rubygems-developers] The case of binary gems and Ruby versions.

Jeremy Hinegardner jeremy at hinegardner.org
Thu Apr 16 22:07:56 EDT 2009

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 05:44:30PM -0700, Ryan Davis wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2009, at 16:15 , Eric Hodel wrote:
>> I see two solutions:
>> Package two separate gems with an indicator in the name for 1.8 vs 1.9
>> Package a gem with both libraries inside, and add something to 
>> require_paths for 1.8 vs 1.9
> or:
> package the gem normally (but specifying what version of ruby should be 
> mandatory) and when it uploads it goes to a versioned depot. pure ruby gems 
> go up to a shared depot, binaries go to a versioned one. gem fetch can deal 
> with this since it has the spec already. I think this should be 
> transparent... NOT as another gem source.

This was my thought too.  Solve this in the repo.  Instead of having




Or something along those lines.



 Jeremy Hinegardner                              jeremy at hinegardner.org 

More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list