[Rubygems-developers] Revision 2154 Results on Windows (mingw32and mswin32)

Luis Lavena luislavena at gmail.com
Wed Apr 8 14:30:30 EDT 2009


On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain at segment7.net> wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2009, at 07:10, Berger, Daniel wrote:
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: rubygems-developers-bounces at rubyforge.org
>>> [mailto:rubygems-developers-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf
>>> Of Eric Hodel
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:23 PM
>>> To: RubyGems developers mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Revision 2154 Results on
>>> Windows (mingw32and mswin32)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 20:54, Luis Lavena wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Following are the pasties containing different versions of Ruby
>>>> 1.8.6 (from p114 to p368 silently released last week).
>>>>
>>>> mingw32:
>>>> http://pastie.org/439209
>>>
>>> There have been some changes to optparse, I see the
>>> test_add_option_overlapping_common_and_local_options failure with:
>>>
>>> ruby 1.8.8dev (2009-04-06 revision 23143) [i386-darwin9.6.0]
>>>
>>> and see some diffs from apple ruby (1.8.6) too.
>>
>> Oh, for the love of...
>>
>> So, now're we're going to start having to check the version of Ruby, even
>> within the 1.8.x branch? Or is there a more generic approach we can take?
>
> The test seemed to have been determining that optparse behaved a certain way
> if it was used it wrong (specifying the same option twice).  I decided to
> just remove the test.

So was bogus?

That make me feel better :-D

-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry


More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list