[Rubygems-developers] Gem#status?

Ryan Davis ryand-ruby at zenspider.com
Wed Nov 12 04:39:52 EST 2008


On Nov 11, 2008, at 10:59 , Phil Hagelberg wrote:

> Really? String#<=> is pretty well-understood as far as I can tell.


yes... it is very well understood to be very bad for this problem:

 >> "a2" <=> "a11"
=> 1
 >> 2 <=> 11
=> -1



More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list