[Rubygems-developers] Docs found by google seem old.

Eric Hodel drbrain at segment7.net
Fri Jan 18 21:09:31 EST 2008

On Jan 17, 2008, at 08:34 AM, Jim Weirich wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote:
>> Jim, you should give webby a try too : http://webby.rubyforge.org/
> Sigh.  Everytime I mention this, someone suggests a DIFFERENT static
> website generator.  Who would have thought there was so much
> competition in this area.
> So, why webby over nanoc and webgen?

While we're sighing over dueling static website generators, why not  
use rdoc*?

This way users can browse documentation with `gem server` even when  
they don't have the internet.

At the very least, it would be nice if we could re-use whatever other  
static files that are generated for documentation in RDoc.

* Yes, there are various problems with RDoc, but this is a forward- 
looking statement, as I have partially addressed that nasty frames  
issue, and am working my way up towards doing something about  
Gem::Specification's undocumented methods.

More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list