drbrain at segment7.net
Fri Feb 1 06:22:07 EST 2008
On Feb 1, 2008, at 02:23 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Mark Hubbart wrote:
>>>> Plus one might not have a rubyforge project.
>> The "real" project could be on sourceforge.org, or code.google.com.
> Maybe there needs to a directive to say whwere the project is?
There is also a #homepage= for Gem::Specification, but with the
current gem repository, this is a bikeshed objection as under 1% of
gems are published without a rubyforge project.
More information about the Rubygems-developers