[Rubygems-developers] Finding where gems are stored

Austin Ziegler halostatue at gmail.com
Mon Oct 22 01:34:10 EDT 2007


On 10/22/07, Trans <transfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/21/07, Eric Hodel <drbrain at segment7.net> wrote:
> > No.
> >
> > If you install the same gem into the default dir and into a separate
> > path (with install -i), the files (.rb and .so) will be installed
> > twice, but only one version will be activated.
> Why not use 'opt/' ? I was reading about it in the FHS and it seems to
> fit exactly with the gems way of doing things.[1] Gems fits the
> /opt/<provider>/<package> mold. All RubyGems would need do is register
> "gems" as a provider LANANA [2] and move the the cache to
> /vat/opt/gems/; then RubyGems would be in perfect compliance with FHS.
>
> [1] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#OPTADDONAPPLICATIONSOFTWAREPACKAGES
> [2] http://www.lanana.org/lsbreg/providers/index.html

Because there are POSIX systems not as stupid as Linux FHS.

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halostatue at gmail.com * http://www.halostatue.ca/
               * austin at halostatue.ca * http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/
               * austin at zieglers.ca


More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list