[Rubygems-developers] Patch added.

Eric Hodel drbrain at segment7.net
Mon Oct 1 10:53:58 EDT 2007


On Oct 1, 2007, at 05:37 , Alan C Francis wrote:
>> I decided to go the opposite way around, and use
>> Gem.configuration.update_sources instead of the hash-type access.  It
>> would probably be better to remove the hash access going forward,
>> since it adds lots of complication and requires more manual
>> documentation.
>
> Great. Thanks!
>
>> Fixed, I'm dumb.
>
> Phew.  Thought I'd hosed myself :-)
>
> Are the team open to patches which are more refactoring than new
> features ?  I'd like to take a crack at tidying up the config_file
> and maybe local_remote_options.

Yes, but I'd like to keep things stable until after RubyGems is  
merged into ruby 1.9.  I think there's one more thing to go in before  
a beta release.

There has been heavy refactoring in RubyGems in the last couple of  
releases, primarily driven by tinderbox, and I'm all for more.

--
Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The
best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars




More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list