[Rubygems-developers] Patch added.

Eric Hodel drbrain at segment7.net
Mon Oct 1 10:53:58 EDT 2007

On Oct 1, 2007, at 05:37 , Alan C Francis wrote:
>> I decided to go the opposite way around, and use
>> Gem.configuration.update_sources instead of the hash-type access.  It
>> would probably be better to remove the hash access going forward,
>> since it adds lots of complication and requires more manual
>> documentation.
> Great. Thanks!
>> Fixed, I'm dumb.
> Phew.  Thought I'd hosed myself :-)
> Are the team open to patches which are more refactoring than new
> features ?  I'd like to take a crack at tidying up the config_file
> and maybe local_remote_options.

Yes, but I'd like to keep things stable until after RubyGems is  
merged into ruby 1.9.  I think there's one more thing to go in before  
a beta release.

There has been heavy refactoring in RubyGems in the last couple of  
releases, primarily driven by tinderbox, and I'm all for more.

Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The
best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars

More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list