[Rubygems-developers] What is right and wrong with dependencies definitions?

Chad Woolley thewoolleyman at gmail.com
Sat Nov 10 21:13:22 EST 2007

On 11/10/07, Eric Hodel <drbrain at segment7.net> wrote:
> I think the majority of the problem is that Ruby's libraries haven't
> matured enough yet.

Totally agreed.  We need tinderbox/gump for ruby.  What is the status
on firebrigade?  I notice my gem hasn't built for several versions
(and won't build without some help, due to the issues discussed in
this thread).

I've been meaning to offer to help with tinderbox in my non-existent
spare time.  I'll get on the list...

More information about the Rubygems-developers mailing list