[Rubygems-developers] gem update --system, heavy ram and cpu consumption
darix at web.de
Sat Jun 2 09:27:40 EDT 2007
On 2007-06-02 07:59:41 -0500, Jim Freeze wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2007, at 11:35 PM, Jim Weirich wrote:
> > On 6/1/07, Jos Backus <jos at catnook.com> wrote:
> >> This is like xcopy with rsync-like options processing. You want (a
> >> Ruby
> >> version of) Pysync instead:
> >> http://freshmeat.net/projects/pysync/
> > Can someone educate me on the advantages of rsync?
> rsync is not nearly as well known and used at it should be.
> IMO, it could essentially replace cp and scp.
> Rsync does a fast hash on small sections of a file to test for changes
> and only copies the sections of a file that have changed.
> So, if you had a 100MB binary file on two computers and changed
> only 100 bytes on one of them (in the middle of the file), rsync would
> be able to transfer that 100 bytes, and some additional overhead, to
> synchronize the files. It would not have to transfer the 100MB.
> Also, it has multiple options, like compression and BW limiting to
> support slow pipes.
> Once you start using rsync, you wonder how you ever got along without
> it. :)
zsync might be more interesting in the end. it shares many features with
rsync but doesnt require a special server. a simple .zsync file and a
plain http server are enough:
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
More information about the Rubygems-developers